Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair post-radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Previous radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a relative contraindication to the laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). This study aimed to compare feasibility, safety and outcomes for patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR who have previously undergone RP. METHODS: This single surgeon, case-control study was performed using a prospective database of all patients undergoing TEP LIHR between 1995 and 2020. Patients who underwent previous RP were identified and compared to matched controls. Pre-operative, operative and post-operative data were analysed. The type of RP, open, laparoscopic or robotic, was identified and operative outcomes compared between the three groups. RESULTS: 6532 LIHR cases were identified. 165 had previously undergone RP and 6367 had undergone primary LIHR without prior RP. The groups were matched for age, demographics and co-morbidities. All operations were commenced laparoscopically, three converted to open in the LIHR + RP group and none in the LIHR group. Median operative time in patients with previous RP was longer, for unilateral (40 min vs. 21 min, p < 0.0001) and bilateral (71 vs. 30 min, p < 0.0001) LIHR. The majority of cases were performed as day stay procedures. There was no difference in immediate recovery parameters including time to discharge, complication rates, return to normal function, return to driving or post-operative analgesia. At 3 months of follow-up there was no difference in hernia recurrence for unilateral (2/128 vs 6/2234, p = 0.0658) or bilateral (0/24 vs 3/1490, p ≥ 0.999) LIHR, nor chronic pain as measured by patient awareness or restriction of activity. No differences in operative and post-operative outcomes were identified between the three types of RP, other than difference in operative time (p = 0.0336). CONCLUSIONS: Previous RP should not be an absolute contraindication for TEP LIHR. Although previous RP adds complexity, in experienced hands TEP LIHR can be done safely, with outcomes equivalent to patients who have not previously undergone RP.

Outcomes in patients with fractured ribs: middle aged at same risk of complications as the elderly.

AIMS: Rib fractures occur in up to 10% of hospitalised trauma patients and are the most common type of clinically significant blunt injury to the thorax. There is strong evidence that elderly patients have worse outcomes compared with younger patients. Evolving evidence suggests adverse outcomes start at a younger age. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of age on outcomes in patients with rib fractures in Northland, New Zealand. METHOD: A two-year retrospective study of patients admitted to any Northland District Health Board hospital with one or more radiologically proven rib fracture was performed. Patients with an abbreviated injury scale score >2 in the head or abdomen were excluded. The study population was stratified by age into three groups: >65, 45 to 65 and <45 years old. RESULTS: 170 patients met study inclusion criteria. Patients <45 had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) and lower rates of pneumonia compared to patients 45 and older, despite a higher Injury Severity Score and pulmonary contusion rate. There was no difference seen between groups in rates of intubation, ICU admission, mortality, empyema or acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: This study found higher rates of pneumonia and an increased LOS in patients 45 and older despite their lower overall injury severity when compared to patients under 45. Patients aged 45-64 had outcomes similar to patients >65. Future clinical pathways and guidelines for patients with rib fractures should consider incorporating a younger age than 65 in risk stratification algorithms.