Multiple-site decontamination in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A real-life study.

INTRODUCTION: Decontamination regimen decreases acquired infection (ICU-AI) incidence but has remained controversial, mostly because it contains a course of intravenous antibiotic. Multiple-site decontamination (MSD), which does not include systemic antibiotics, has been less widely studied but is associated with lower risks of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), bloodstream infection (BSI) and multidrug resistant micro-organism (MDRO) acquisition. We aimed to confirm these favorable outcomes. METHODS: A prospective pre/post-observational study was conducted in 5 ICUs in western France. Among them, 4 implemented MSD, whereas the fifth applied standard care (SC) throughout the study period. Patients who required intubation were eligible for study and divided into two groups: the MSD group if they were admitted to an ICU that already implemented MSD, or the SC group. The primary objective was to measure ICU-AI incidence. RESULTS: Close to 1400 (1346) patients were available for analysis (334 in the MSD and 1012 patients in the SC group). In a multivariable Poisson regression model, MSD was independently associated with decreased incidence of ICU-AI (IRR = 0.33; 95 %CI [0.18-0.60] p < 0.001). Non-parsimonious propensity-score matching resulted in 334 patient-pairs with well-balanced baseline characteristics. There was a lower incidence of ICU-AI(6.3 % vs 20.7 % p < 0.001), VAP (3.6 % vs 16.2 % p < 0.001) and BSI (3.0 % vs 7.2 % p = 0.029) in the MSD group as compared with the SC group. Five (1.5 %) and 11 (3.3 %) patients respectively acquired MDRO (p = 0.206). CONCLUSION: MSD is associated with decreased risk of ICU-AI, VAP and BSI, with no increase in MDRO acquisition.

Attributable mortality of ICU acquired bloodstream infections: a propensity-score matched analysis.

The mortality attributable to ICU-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) differs between studies due to statistical methods used for cohort matching. Propensity-score matching has never been used to avoid eventual bias when studying BSI attributable mortality in the ICU. We conducted an observational prospective study over a 4-year period, on patients admitted for at least 48 h in 2 intensive care units. Based on risk factors for death in the ICU and for BSI, each patient with BSI was matched with 3 patients without BSI using propensity-score matching. We performed a competitive risk analysis to study BSI mortality attributable fraction. Of 2464 included patients, 71 (2.9%) had a BSI. Propensity-score matching was highly effective and group characteristics were fully balanced. Crude mortality was 36.6% in patients with BSI and 21.6% in propensity-score matched patients (p=0.018). Attributable mortality of BSI was 2.3% [1.2-4.0] and number needed to harm was 6.7. With Fine and Gray model, a higher risk for death was observed in patients with BSI than in propensity-score matched patients (sub distribution Hazard Ratio (sdHR) = 2.11; 95% CI [1.32-3.37] p = 0.002). Patients with BSI had a higher risk for death and BSI attributable mortality fraction was 2.3%.