Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common diagnosis for patients with pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. Variations in the signs and symptoms might lead to uncertainty regarding the definition of SIS. The aim of this review is to explore the participant selection criteria used in the literature when investigating SIS and to assess differences in criteria among treating professions. METHODS: This is a PRISMA systematic review of publications from 2009 to 2014 from MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL. RESULTS: Ninety-seven articles met inclusion criteria for this review. Twenty-five different surgical and nonsurgical treatments were investigated. Impingement-specific index tests were used in all studies. Exclusion index tests were used in 62% of studies. Twenty index tests were identified. Radiological investigations were reported in 53% of all studies, of which a further 53% reported using two or more radiological investigations. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has illustrated that studies investigating SIS test for various signs and symptoms, which is in keeping with describing the condition as a 'syndrome'. However, there are inconsistencies in participant selection criteria between health disciplines, highlighting a need for harmonization of the selection criteria in the form of an international editorial consensus.

Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of mechanical axis alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty using long leg radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Long leg radiographs (LLRs) are commonly performed for assessment of mechanical alignment and operative planning in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of alignment measured by observers of different levels of experience. METHODS: Forty patients on the waiting list for a TKA had pre- and post-operative standardised LLRs. We analysed the measurements of mechanical axis alignment between an orthopaedic surgeon, a senior orthopaedic registrar, a junior orthopaedic registrar, and a medical student. Reviewers performed blinded measurements on the same computer screen. These measurements were repeated three months later to assess intra-observer reliability. Furthermore high-resolution screens were compared with standard hospital computer screens to investigate whether monitoring quality influenced the accuracy of measurements of alignment. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was high for pre-operative LLRs with an intra-class correlation (ICC) of >0.9 at all experience levels. Post-operative ICC was lowest between the surgeon and the medical student at 0.7. Intra-observer reliability was high at all experience levels. Larger deformities appeared to have exaggerated measurements for both pre- and post-operative images. There appeared to be no effect of the monitor size and quality on the accuracy of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Long leg radiographs can be used to measure mechanical axis alignment with strong reliability across different levels of experience. This information is important for the evaluation of knee alignment measurements in current clinical practice, to assess severity of deformity and to accompany pre-operative planning and post-operative evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.