Sonographically Determined Fecal Width: An Objective Indicator of Management of Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether sonographically determined fecal width (SDFW) correlates with symptom improvement in a population of children with bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) managed with standard urotherapy (SU), even for those patients lacking initial bowel complaints. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 200 pediatric BBD patients managed with SU for at least 3 months. Self-reported symptom improvement (complete, partial, no response) following International Children's Continence Society guidelines was tabulated. Patients with complex urologic diagnoses other than vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were excluded. Pharmacotherapy choice, physical therapy (PT), urinary tract infection (UTI) occurrence, and VUR status were tabulated. SDFW was recorded. Non-parametric analysis of variants (ANOVA) and parametric/non-parametric t testing were used for analysis. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 9.5 years (4-12). Forty-eight patients had no gastrointestinal complaints at presentation. Urotherapy yielded complete, partial, and no responses in 14% (n = 27), 33% (n = 67), and 53% (n = 106) of patients, respectively. The average SDFW for those patients with complete response (2.6 cm) was smaller than the SDFW of those with a partial response (3.1 cm) or no response (3.3 cm) (P = .0001). Non-compliance led to greater SDFW compared to compliant patients (3.7 cm and 3.1 cm, respectively, P = .0001). Fecal width was unaffected by VUR, UTI, PT, or pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: SDFW correlates well with symptom improvement in pediatric patients managed for BBD, confirming our hypothesis. SDFW is reasonable as single objective parameter to identify successful management in patients with BBD, extending to those without bowel complaints at presentation.

Characteristics of testicular tumors in prepubertal children (age 5-12 years).

INTRODUCTION: Testicular tumors in children have two peaks with different types of tumors; in the first 4 years of life a third to half are benign with increased risk of malignancy during puberty. The pathology of testicular tumors between these peaks, at the age of 5-12 years, is not known. We hypothesized that because of the low level of testosterone at this time, the incidence of malignant tumors is very low. OBJECTIVE: To compare malignancy risk of primary testicular tumors in children in the prepubertal period (5-12 years) compared with younger (0-4 years) and pubertal (13-18 years) children. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively (2002-2016) identified patients <18 years with surgery for primary testicular tumor. Patients with testicular tumor risk were excluded. Ultrasound studies were reviewed for contralateral testis volume, tumor morphology, and tumor maximal diameter, for three age groups: 0-4, 5-12, and 13-18 years. The Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact probability test was adopted for categorical outcomes, and one-way ANOVA for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (mean age 11.0 years, range 6 days-18 years) were identified. Malignant tumor prevalence significantly differed (p < 0.01) among age groups (Fig).: 0-4 (72.7%, 8/11), 5-12 (0%, 0/16), and 13-18 years (44.0%, 11/25). The most common tumor types in 5-12 years were epidermoid cyst (31.3%, 5/16) and tumor mimics (37.5%, 6/16). Prevalence of cystic tumors in 5-12 year olds was not significantly different compared with other age groups. Contralateral testicular volume >4 mL (pubertal surge) significantly (p < 0.01) differed among groups: 0-4 years (0/11), 5-12 years (3/16), and 13-18 years (19/20). In children aged 13-18 years the mean tumor maximal diameter (29.8 ± 4.4 mm) was significantly larger (p < 0.01) compared with children 5-12 years (9.3 ± 5.5 mm) and all malignant tumors had contralateral testicular volume >4 mL. DISCUSSION: We found that preadolescent children between the ages of 5 and 12 years have distinctive characteristics compared with the other age groups. Most importantly, no malignant testicular tumors were found in this age group. About a third of the children presented with an incidental testicular mass. The testicular tumors were significantly smaller (9.3 ± 6.7 mm) compared with those in children aged 13-18 years (29.8 ± 4.4 mm). There were limitations because of the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: We found no malignant testicular tumors in children aged 5-12 years with no risk factors and prior to pubertal surge. Our study suggests use of more conservative treatment in this group of patients.

Comparing inpatient versus outpatient bowel preparation in children and adolescents undergoing appendicovesicostomy.

PURPOSE: The need for mechanical inpatient bowel preparation (IBP) in reconstructive pediatric urology has come under scrutiny, secondary to literature demonstrating little benefit regarding outcomes. Starting in 2013, a majority of patients undergoing reconstructive procedures at our institution no longer underwent IBP. We hypothesized that outpatient bowel preparation (OBP) would reduce length of stay (LOS) without increasing postoperative complications after appendicovesicostomy surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional database of patients undergoing lower urinary tract reconstruction between May 2010 and December 2014 was reviewed. Starting in 2013, a departmental decision was made to replace IBP with OBP. Patients undergoing an augmentation cystoplasty or continent ileovesicostomy were excluded because of insufficient numbers undergoing OBP. Patients undergoing IBP were admitted 1 day prior to surgery and received polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution. A personalized preoperative OBP was introduced in 2013. Cost data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, with 30 (44.8%) undergoing IBP. There were no differences with respect to gender, age, presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt, body mass index, glomerular filtration rate, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, and prior or simultaneous associated surgeries (p ≥ 0.07). Patients undergoing an IBP had a longer median LOS (7 vs. 5 days, p = 0.0002) and a higher median cost (US$4,288, p = 0.01). Postoperative complications in both groups were uncommon and were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2, with no statistical difference (IBP 20.0% vs. OBP 5.4%, p = 0.13). No serious postoperative complication occurred, such as a dehiscence, bowel obstruction, or shunt infection. DISCUSSION: This is the first analysis of hospitalization costs and IBP, showing a higher median cost of US$4288 compared with OBP. The LOS was shorter with an OBP (figure), similar to a previous report. Similar complication rates between the groups add to the growing body of literature that avoidance of IBP is safe in pediatric lower urinary tract reconstruction. Being a retrospective review of a practice change, differences in care that influenced cost and LOS may be missing. Also, as the surgeons do not know if a usable appendix is initially present, our data may not extrapolate to all patients. Despite these potential limitations, our data support the safety of utilizing OBP in patients with a high likelihood of a usable appendix, including those undergoing a synchronous Malone antegrade continence enema via a split-appendix technique. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing an appendicovesicostomy, preoperative IBP led to longer LOS and higher costs of hospitalization. OBP was not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications.