An Integrative Review of "The Pause" After Patient Death.

Background: Healthcare providers are engrossed in high-stakes, high-stress situations during their daily work with patient death being a potential negative outcome of work-related stress. Many interventions exist to combat work-related stress among nurses. The Pause, an intervention to offer a moment of silence for the healthcare team after a patient death, is one example. Objective: An integrative review of The Pause was conducted to investigate its use and how it impacts healthcare providers and their work environments. Methods: The integrative review methodology by Whittemore and Knafl was used to guide this study. Steps included were problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation. Content analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Seven databases were searched in 2022 and seven studies were identified for inclusion in this review. Two themes were identified: personal benefits and professional benefits. Findings reveal benefits from self-care and grief processing to a better work environment. Conclusions: The Pause is a low-cost, low-risk intervention that can be implemented at an organizational level to help reduce burnout, unresolved grief, increase resilience, increase retention, and improve patient outcomes. Future research should include an examination of how The Pause may affect patient outcomes and workplace culture.

Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Predatory publishers and their associated journals have been identified as a threat to the integrity of the scientific literature. Research on the phenomenon of predatory publishing in health care remains unquantified. PURPOSE: To identify the characteristics of empirical studies on predatory publishing in the health care literature. METHODS: A scoping review was done using PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. A total of 4967 articles were initially screened; 77 articles reporting empirical findings were ultimately reviewed. RESULTS: The 77 articles were predominantly bibliometric analyses/document analyses (n = 56). The majority were in medicine (n = 31, 40%) or were multidisciplinary (n = 26, 34%); 11 studies were in nursing. Most studies reported that articles published in predatory journals were of lower quality than those published in more reputable journals. In nursing, the research confirmed that articles in predatory journals were being cited in legitimate nursing journals, thereby spreading information that may not be credible through the literature. CONCLUSION: The purposes of the evaluated studies were similar: to understand the characteristics and extent of the problem of predatory publishing. Although literature about predatory publishing is abundant, empirical studies in health care are limited. The findings suggest that individual vigilance alone will not be enough to address this problem in the scholarly literature. Institutional policy and technical protections are also necessary to mitigate erosion of the scientific literature in health care.