Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia is extremely rare with only 14 cases reported in the literature. Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia is a benign lesion that is easily confused with malignancy. CASE REPORT: We present a 22-year-old woman referred to our gynecologic oncology service with a 2.0 x 4.0-cm exophytic cervical mass. Colposcopic-directed cervical biopsies were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, suggestive of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Computed tomographic scans of the abdomen and the pelvis failed to reveal any metastatic foci. A radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling was performed without complications. Final pathology revealed diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia is an uncommon histological type of pseudoneoplastic glandular lesions that may be found in the cervix, and this entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a potentially malignant endocervical glandular lesion.

Sustained response to bevacizumab in refractory well-differentiated ovarian neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab has demonstrated activity against a variety of solid tumors, including ovarian carcinoma. However, there have not been reproducible prognostic features associated with its activity. CASES: One patient each with recurrent, refractory well-differentiated serous-endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary, and primary peritoneal micropapillary serous carcinoma were treated with single agent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] intravenously every 3 weeks). All three have had dramatic sustained responses of 15, 15, and 22 months' duration. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab may have significant activity against well-differentiated ovarian carcinoma and micropapillary serous carcinomas of the ovary or peritoneum. Since these tumors are generally indolent and not responsive to adjuvant therapy, further investigation is warranted.

Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine if International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) subdivision into IA1 versus IA2 is predictive of survival differences for early invasive adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Public-Use Database was used to identify all cases of IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1983 and 1997. A systematic literature search (MEDLINE 1966-2000) was used to identify all previously published cases. Stage, depth of invasion, node status, therapy, and survival were analyzed using Fisher's exact and log-rank tests. RESULTS: In SEER, 560 cases were identified: 200 IA1, 286 IA2, and 74 localized. Simple hysterectomy was performed in 272 (48.6%) and radical hysterectomy in 210 (37.5%). Positive lymph nodes were found in 3 of 197 (1.5%) who underwent lymphadenectomy, 2 of whom died. The censored survival by stage (mean follow-up 51.6 months) was not significantly different (P = 0.77) for IA1 versus IA2 (98.5% vs 98.6%). Combining these data with all other published series of early cervical adenocarcinoma, 1170 cases were identified, including 585 IA1, 358 IA2, and 227 "others," with less defined early disease. Of 531 (45.4%) who underwent lymphadenectomy, 15 (1.28%) had one or more positive nodes; of these, 11 (73.3%) recurred or died. For IA1 versus IA2 disease, there were no significant differences in the frequency of positive lymph nodes, recurrence, or death. However, "others," those with less well-defined lesions, or larger than IA2, were at increased risk. CONCLUSION: Early invasive adenocarcinoma (IA1 and IA2) has an excellent prognosis and conservative surgery may be appropriate. Since current FIGO staging definitions do not distinguish high- from low-risk disease, individualization of therapy based on pathology review, risk assessment, and patient preference is recommended.