Exploring complement biomarkers in suspected axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate lectin pathway proteins (LPPs) as biomarkers for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a cross-sectional cohort with a suspicion of axSpA, comprising newly diagnosed axSpA and chronic low back pain (cLBP) individuals. METHODS: Serum samples from 515 participants within the OptiRef cohort, including 151 axSpA patients and 364 cLBP patients, were measured using immunoassays for LPPs (mannan-binding lectin (MBL), collectin liver-1 (CL-L1), M-ficolin, H-ficolin and L-ficolin, MBL-associated serine proteases (MASP)-1, -2 and -3, MBL-associated proteins (MAp19 and MAp44) and the complement activation product C3dg). RESULTS: Serum levels of L-ficolin, MASP-2 and C3dg were elevated in axSpA patients, whereas levels of MASP-3 and CL-L1 were decreased, and this remained significant for C3dg and MASP-3 after adjustment for C reactive protein (CRP). A univariate regression analysis showed serum levels of CL-L1, MASP-2, MASP-3 and C3dg to predict the diagnosis of axSpA, and MASP-3 and C3dg remained significant in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Assessment of the diagnostic potential showed that a combination of human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) and measurements of L-ficolin, MASP-3 and C3dg increased the diagnostic specificity for axSpA, however, with a concomitant loss of sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of complement activation, that is, C3dg, and MASP-3 differed significantly between axSpA and cLBP patients after adjustment for CRP. Although combining HLA-B27 with measurements of L-ficolin, MASP-3 and C3dg increased the diagnostic specificity for axSpA, this seems unjustified due to the concomitant loss of sensitivity. However, both C3dg and MASP-3 were associated with axSpA diagnosis in multivariate logistic regression, suggesting an involvement of complement in the inflammatory processes and possibly pathogenesis in axSpA.

Comparison of the effect of treatment with NSAIDs added to anti-TNF therapy versus anti-TNF therapy alone on the progression of structural damage in the spine over 2 years in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis from the randomised-controlled CONSUL trial.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), celecoxib (CEL), to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), golimumab (GOL), compared with TNFi monotherapy on radiographic spinal progression in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) over 2 years. METHODS: R-axSpA patients, having risk factors for radiographic progression (high disease activity plus C reactive protein >5 mg/L and/or ≥1 syndesmophyte(s)), underwent a 12-week run-in phase with GOL 50 mg every 4 weeks. In the core phase (96 weeks), only patients with a good clinical response at week 12 were randomised (1:1) to GOL+CEL 200 mg two times per day (combination therapy) or GOL monotherapy. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression assessed by modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) change at week 108 in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were enrolled in the run-in phase; and 109 patients were randomised at week 12 to monotherapy (n=55) or combination therapy (n=54). At week 108, 97 (52 vs 45) patients completed the study. The change in mSASSS at week 108 was 1.7 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.6) in the monotherapy vs 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.8) in the combination therapy groups (p=0.79). New syndesmophytes occurred in 25% of patients in the monotherapy vs 11% of patients in the combination therapy groups (p=0.12). During the study, no significant differences in adverse events and serious adverse events were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with GOL+CEL did not demonstrate statistically significant superiority over GOL monotherapy in retarding radiographic spinal progression over 2 years in r-axSpA.

Comparison of an online self-referral tool with a physician-based referral strategy for early recognition of patients with a high probability of axial spa.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA) remains unacceptably high, with one of the reasons being a late referral. Structured physician-based referral programs are able to improve early diagnosis, but lack of implementation is still an issue. The objective of this study was to evaluate an online self-referral (OSR) tool for patients with back pain and to compare it to an established physician-based referral tool. METHODS: Patients with back pain were included if they either fulfilled the requirements of the OSR tool or were referred by a physician using the Berlin referral tool. Rheumatologists in the specialized center performed a structured assessment in all patients that resulted in the final diagnosis of axial SpA / no axial SpA. Furthermore, we attempted to optimize the OSR tool in terms of maximizing the specificity constrained by a sensitivity of at least 90% of the original strategy. RESULTS: 361 consecutive patients (180 via the OSR and 181 via the Berlin referral tool) were included in the study. A total of 35 patients (19.4%) in the self-referral group and 71 patients (39.2%) in the physician-referral group were finally diagnosed with axial SpA. Axial SpA patients from the OSR group were more often HLA-B27 negative, females, and were more frequently at a non-radiographic stage as compared to axial SpA patients who came via the physician-based tool. Both groups had, however, a similar disease burden. According to the pre-defined selection criterion we identified an optimized combination of ≥2 IBP parameters and ≥1 other SpA parameters (in addition to both stem parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the better performance of the physician-based referral strategy, the proportion of axial SpA among self-referred patients (19.4%) was clearly higher than the assumed 5% prevalence of axial SpA in patients with chronic back pain. Based on our data driven approach the performance of the OSR strategy could be further improved if at least two IBP parameters plus one additional SpA parameter had to be present in addition to the stem parameters. The OSR tool can be used in specialized centers in addition to a physician-based referral strategy to improve early diagnosis and to increase awareness of axial SpA.

Performance of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on a quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on a validated quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay (ASDAS-qCRP) as compared to ASDAS based on a routine lab CRP assay (ASDAS-CRP) and ASDAS based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASDAS-ESR). METHODS: Disease activity assessment was performed in 50 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Routine lab CRP was measured in the central lab while the quantitative quick-CRP assay and ESR measurements were performed locally. ASDAS-CRP, ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-ESR were subsequently calculated. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) serum level of the routine lab CRP (6.2±8.3mg/l) was lower than of the quick-CRP (7.4±8.4mg/l) (P<0.05). Whereat, there was no significant difference in the mean values of ASDAS-CRP and ASDAS-qCRP in axSpA patients (2.70±0.94 and 2.74±0.96, respectively, P=0.069), while the ASDAS-ESR (2.85±1.0) was significantly higher than ASDAS-CRP (P=0.036) and numerically higher than ASDAS-qCRP (P=0.125). In 47 of the 50 cases of axSpA (94%), patients were assigned to the same disease activity category according to ASDAS-CRP and ASDAS-qCRP. CONCLUSIONS: ASDAS-qCRP performed similarly well compared to ASDAS-CRP with the absolute agreement on the disease activity category according to the ASDAS of 94%. ASDAS-qCRP is, therefore, feasible for an immediate decision-making in clinical practice and trials aimed at treating to target.