Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respiration ; 97(1): 34-41, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using valves and coils has been approved for use since 2003 and 2010, respectively. OBJECTIVE(S): To study adoption patterns of BLVR in an early-adopting country, and to estimate potential treatment volumes in other European countries. METHODS: Therapy- and age-specific volumes for endobronchial valve and coil procedures were obtained from German federal statistics for 2007-2016. Therapy-specific and total BLVR procedure volumes and growth were computed, and patterns in treatment age and device utilization analyzed. Patient volumes for other European countries were predicted using mean German patient volumes of the last 3 data years and age-specific population and emphysema incidences. RESULTS: Over the study period, annual BLVR procedure volumes grew from 91 to 2,053 (+2,256%), reaching a peak of 2,556 procedures in 2013. Coil procedures constituted 36% of the total volume in 2016. Treatment age was stable over time, with highest procedure counts in age group 60-64 years for valves and 65-69 years for coils. A limited increase in device use per procedure was observed. For -Germany, 1,655 newly treated BLVR patients were estimated per year, approximating about 5% of the annual newly diagnosed severe emphysema cases. Predicted volume estimates for other European countries ranged from 1 for Liechtenstein to 1,226 for France. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of -German procedure data show pronounced BLVR therapy uptake in the early years of adoption, with the more recently introduced coil therapy used in about one-third of patients. Estimated patient volumes to date constitute only a small fraction of the severe emphysema population.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Pneumonectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses e Implantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfisema Pulmonar/cirurgia , Idoso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Cephalalgia ; 38(8): 1455-1462, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29921140

RESUMO

Background On-demand stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) by means of an implantable neurostimulation system has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for treatment-refractory cluster headache patients. Our objective was to estimate changes in cluster headache medication cost observed in SPG-treated chronic patients. Methods Detailed patient-level data of 71 chronic patients treated with the Pulsante® SPG Microstimulator System were available from the Pathway R-1 Registry through 12 months' follow-up. We used utilization data of preventive and acute medications reported at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to estimate annualized drug costs for SPG-treated patients and compared it to baseline. Cost estimates for all drug/dosage combinations were developed based on German medication prices for 2016. Results In the base case analysis, mean annual acute and preventive medication costs decreased from €14,178 to €6924 (-€7254; -51%), and €559 to €328 (-€231; -41%), respectively, leading to total estimated annual drug cost savings of €7484, 97% of which were attributable to acute medications. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that SPG stimulation for the treatment of chronic cluster headache is associated with pronounced reductions in cluster headache medication usage that might lead to sizable annual savings in medication costs.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica/economia , Cefaleia Histamínica/terapia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/economia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/economia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...