Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Reprod Med ; 58(3-4): 153-60, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23539885

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of agents used for ovarian stimulation and luteal support when applied in a population of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN: A phase 4, multicenter, randomized, open-label, exploratory clinical trial was performed at 7 assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States. Subjects included 173 women aged 18-42 years with a documented history of infertility who were undergoing IVF. Subjects were randomized to treatment with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) or recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) for ovarian stimulation and progesterone vaginal inserts (PVIs) or intramuscular injection of progesterone in oil (PIO) for luteal support. Protocols for IVF followed the standard practices of participating centers within the parameters of the study. RESULTS: Biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates were the main outcome measures. Ongoing pregnancy rates for individual treatment groups ranged from 44.0-46.9%. No statistically significant differences were observed in pregnancy outcomes for the comparisons of HP-hMG vs. rhFSH or PVI vs. PIO. All study medications were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study HP-hMG and rhFSH were equally effective for ovarian stimulation during GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. Both PVI and PIO are viable options for luteal support.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Menotropinas/uso terapêutico , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Manutenção do Corpo Lúteo , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Menotropinas/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Progesterona/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Fertil Steril ; 84(5): 1450-6, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16275243

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Oxiplex/AP Gel (FzioMed, San Luis Obispo, CA) was safe and preliminarily effective in reducing postsurgical adhesions after adnexal surgery by laparoscopy. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-monitored feasibility study. SETTING: University and private clinics. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with pelvic adhesions, tubal occlusion, endometriosis, and/or dermoids were randomized to receive Oxiplex/AP Gel or no further treatment after surgery. INTERVENTION(S): A blinded, parallel-group design was conducted at six centers. Patients (aged 18-46 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery, with second-look surgery 6-10 weeks later. Surgeries were videotaped. Oxiplex/AP Gel was used to cover adnexa and adjacent tissue. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blinded reviews of videotapes were quantitated with the American Fertility Society adhesion score (AFS score). RESULT(S): In 18 treatment patients, surgery was performed on 29 adnexa. Application of Oxiplex/AP Gel required approximately 90 seconds. In 10 control patients, surgery was performed on 18 adnexa. The mean baseline AFS score for each group was 8.0. At second look, treated adnexa had the same score (8.1), whereas in control adnexa the score increased (from 8.0 to 11.6). Thirty-four percent of treated adnexa increased in adhesion score, in contrast to 67% of control adnexa. There were no device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): In this pilot study, Oxiplex/AP Gel was safe, easy to use with laparoscopy, and produced a reduction in the increase of adnexal adhesion scores.


Assuntos
Celulose/análogos & derivados , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Aderências Teciduais/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Celulose/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Géis , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Aderências Teciduais/patologia
3.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 3: 62, 2005 Nov 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16280073

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The safety and tolerability of a new highly purified, urine-derived human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparation [Menopur] was compared with a currently available hMG [Repronex] in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study conducted in subjects undergoing IVF. Women (N = 125), 18-39 years of age, underwent pituitary down-regulation with leuprolide acetate beginning 7 days prior to onset of menses and continuing up to the day before hCG administration. Subjects were randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) Menopur (n = 61) or Repronex SC (n = 64) for a maximum of 12 days. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded and subject self-assessments of injection site reactions were recorded in a daily diary. RESULTS: Significantly fewer subjects in the Menopur group reported injection site reactions (P < 0.001) compared to the Repronex group. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Menopur SC offers a greater safety and tolerability profile compared to Repronex SC.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Injeções Subcutâneas/efeitos adversos , Menotropinas/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Menotropinas/efeitos adversos , Compostos Orgânicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Orgânicos/efeitos adversos , Dor/etiologia
4.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 1: 63, 2003 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14609434

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: These data compare the efficacy and safety of highly purified human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle) and recombinant follitropin-beta (Follistim) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. METHODS: This report describes the pooled data from two, nearly identical, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter studies conducted in a total of 19 academic and private IVF-ET centers in the United States. Infertile premenopausal women underwent pituitary down-regulation using leuprolide acetate followed by a maximum of 12 days of subcutaneous Bravelle (n = 120) or Follistim (n = 118), followed by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer. The primary efficacy measure was the mean number of oocytes retrieved; secondary efficacy measures included the total dose and duration of gonadotropin treatment; peak serum estradion levels; embryo transfer and implantation rates; chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies; and live birth rates. All adverse events were recorded and injection site pain was recorded daily using a patient, self-assessment diary. RESULTS: Similar efficacy responses were observed for all outcome parameters in the two treatment groups. Although patients receiving Bravelle consistently reported a greater number of chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies, as well as an increased rate of live birth, the data did not attain statistical significance (P > 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, but compared to Follistim, injections of Bravelle were reported by patients to be significantly less painful (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bravelle and Follistim had comparable efficacy in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women undergoing IVF-ET. There were no differences in the nature or number of adverse events between the treatment groups although Bravelle injections were reported to be significantly less painful.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/farmacologia , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/farmacologia , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Gonadotropina Coriônica/farmacologia , Transferência Embrionária , Feminino , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Leuprolida/farmacologia , Oócitos/citologia , Oócitos/fisiologia , Oócitos/transplante , Dor/complicações , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Fertil Steril ; 79(3): 603-7, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12620447

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate controlled ovarian stimulation cycles using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in combination with the recombinant FSH, follitropin-beta, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study. SETTING: Hospital-based infertility practice. PATIENT(S): Twenty women with PCOS planning to undergo ovarian stimulation. INTERVENTION(S): Fasting glucose and insulin levels were used to calculate insulin resistance ratios (FG/I). After pretreatment with oral contraceptives, serum LH levels were determined, and 250 microg ganirelix was administered on cycle day 2. Upon suppression of LH, concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy (morning ganirelix and evening follitropin-beta) was started and continued until the day of hCG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days of stimulation, dose of follitropin-beta, pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy were compared based on FG/I ratios. RESULTS: One dose of ganirelix effectively suppressed LH levels in all patients. All patients ovulated as documented by a rise in progesterone. Significant differences were observed between the insulin-resistant and non-insulin-resistant groups for both days of stimulation and dose of follitropin-beta. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 44.4%, with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 27.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy for ovarian stimulation in women with PCOS.


Assuntos
Subunidade beta do Hormônio Folículoestimulante/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/terapia , Glicemia/análise , Gonadotropina Coriônica/administração & dosagem , Jejum , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Antagonistas de Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Insulina/sangue , Resistência à Insulina , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...