Proactive behaviors and health care workers: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Proactive behaviors at work refer to discretionary actions among workers that are self-starting, change oriented, and future focused. Proactive behaviors reflect the idiosyncratic actions by individual workers that shape the delivery and experience of professional services, highlight a bottom-up perspective on workers' agency and motivation that can influence organizational practices, and are associated with a variety of employee and organizational outcomes. PURPOSE: This systematic review aims to understand the various forms of proactive behaviors in health care workers that have been studied, and how these proactive behaviors are associated with employee-level outcomes and quality of care. METHODS: Systematic review of articles published to date on proactive behaviors in health care workers. RESULTS: Based on the identification of 40 articles, we find that job crafting, active problem solving, voice, extra-role behaviors, and idiosyncratic deals have been investigated as proactive behaviors among health care workers. Among these, job crafting is the most commonly studied (35% of articles), and it has been conceptualized and measured in the most consistent way, including as individual- and group-level phenomena, and as organizational interventions. Studies on active problem solving, which refers to workers accepting responsibility, exercising control, and taking action around anticipated or experienced problems at work, have not been consistently investigated as a form of proactive behavior but represent 25% of the articles identified in this review. Overall, this review finds that proactive behaviors in health care is a burgeoning area of research, with the majority of studies being cross-sectional in design and published after 2010, and focused on workers' job satisfaction as the outcome. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care workers and managers should consider the distinct influences and contributions of proactive behaviors as ways to improve employee-level outcomes and quality of care.

Work Engagement and Patient Quality of Care: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Past research has demonstrated that work engagement among health care professionals influences patient quality of care. There is, however, no estimate of the strength of this relationship, and existing reviews have not always explained conflicting findings. We conduct a meta-analysis and review of 25 articles, and find a small to medium mean effect size (r = .26, p < .01) for the positive association between engagement and quality of care. Moderator analyses on five factors (type, data source, level of analysis of the quality of care measure, profession, and work engagement measure) indicate that only data source is significant, providing preliminary evidence that the relationship is stronger if quality of care is measured via self-assessments. Although a more consistent conceptualization of quality of care is needed to better determine its association with work engagement, our findings suggest that work engagement is as important as burnout in predicting quality of care.