Seasonal tourism's impact on wastewater composition: Evaluating the potential of alternating activated adsorption in primary treatment.

Primary treatment processes have gained attention in recent research and development due to their potential for redirecting carbon towards anaerobic digestion, which can subsequently be used for the production of biomethane. The alternating activated adsorption (AAA) process is implemented on full-scale at several wastewater treatment plants across Europe. However, there is a lack of full-scale studies of advanced carbon capture technology implementations in literature. This study demonstrates the ability of a full-scale AAA process to remove and redirect carbon in a region heavily influenced by tourism. Periods in high and off-season were compared to study the impact of tourism on the composition of the wastewater and the AAA-process. The wastewater characteristics of the high season differed significantly from the low season. During the high season, the PE increased by 37 %, total suspended solids went up by 75 % and chemical oxygen demand increased by 58 %, compared to the low season. Additionally, 80 % of the low volatile lipophilic substances (LVLS) measured were attributed to the impact of tourism. A mass-balance of primary treatment for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and LVLS was conducted for both trial periods. The primary treatment was able to eliminate 56 % of the COD and 62 % of the LVLS in the non-tourist season and 53 % of the COD and 54 % of the LVLS in the tourist season. The increased wastewater load was effectively managed in the AAA-process. Key process parameters like sludge settling characteristics, hydraulic retention time and total suspended solids removal rates remained stable during the high season in winter.

Decentralised system for demand-oriented collection of food waste - Assessment of biomethane potential, pathogen development and microbial community structure.

Enormous amounts of food waste (FW) are produced worldwide, requiring efficient disposal strategies, both economically and ecologically. Anaerobic digestion to produce biomethane is among the most promising strategies, but requires proper solutions for storage and delivery of the waste material. Here, a decentralized system for demand-oriented FW storage and its practical usability was assessed. FW was stored under batch and fed-batch strategies at 5 °C, 20 °C and 30 °C for 28 days. The results showed that FW can be stored without cooling since bacterially produced lactic acid rapidly stabilized the material and inactivated pathogens. While FW storage worked well under all storage conditions and strategies, 16S analysis revealed a distinct microbiota, which was highly characteristic for each storage temperature. Moreover, FW storage had no negative impact on methane yield and stored FW contained readily degradable substances for demand-oriented biogas production.

Residual municipal solid waste as co-substrate at wastewater treatment plants: An assessment of methane yield, dewatering potential and microbial diversity.

Separately collected organic fraction of municipal solid waste, also known as biowaste, is typically used to fill the available capacity of digesters at wastewater treatment plants. However, this approach might impair the use of the ensuing digestate for fertilizer production due to the presence of sewage sludge, a contaminated substrate. Worldwide, unsorted municipal solid household waste, i.e. residual waste, is still typically disposed of in landfills or incinerated, despite its high content of biodegradables and recyclables. Once efficiently separated from residual waste by mechanical processes, the biodegradables might be appropriate to substitute biowaste at wastewater treatment plants. Thus, the biowaste would be available for fertilizer production and contribute to a reduction in the demand on non-renewable fertilizers. This study aimed at determining the technical feasibility of co-digesting the mechanically separated organic fraction of residual waste with sewage sludge. Further, key parameters for the implementation of co-digestion at wastewater treatment plants were determined, namely, degradation of the solids and organics, specific methane production, flocculant demand, and dewatered sludge production. The microbial community and diversity in both mono- and co-digestion was also investigated. Semi-continuous laboratory scale experiments showed that the co-substrate derived from the residual waste provided a stable anaerobic co-digestion process, producing 206 to 245 L of methane per kg of volatiles solids added to the digester. The dewaterability of the digestate increased by 4.8 percentage points when the co-substrate was added; however, there was also an increase in the flocculant demand. The specific dewatered sludge production was 955 kg per ton of total solids of co-substrate added to the digester. Amplicon sequencing analysis provided a detailed insight into the microbial communities, which were primarily affected by the addition of co-substrate. The microbiota was fully functional and no inhibition or problems in the anaerobic digestion process were observed after co-substrate addition.

The economic efficiency of the co-digestion at WWTPs: A full-scale study.

The methane and digestate production from biowaste (BW, 95% food waste and 5% garden waste based on fresh mass) and grease trap sludge (GTS) co-digestion at the Grossache-Nord WWTP (Austria) as a basis for a cost-benefit analysis was determined using two approaches: The first one was to determine the specific methane yields (SMY) and total solids (TS) removals (%) of the used substrates in biomethane potential (BMP) tests. In the second, the full-scale process data from a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system were analyzed. From these data, the SMY of the sewage sludge (SS) was calculated for a period without co-digestion and applied to the study period. Thus, it was possible to calculate the methane and digestate production from the co-substrates. Both approaches produced different co-substrate SMYs and TS degradation results. In the approach using the BMP, the SMY was 518 m3/t TSadded and the TS degradation was 77%. For the full-scale method, these values were found to be 620 m3/t TSadded and 66%, respectively. However, the cost-benefit analysis of both approaches indicated that electricity generation from co-digestion can cover the associated costs. The benefit to cost ratio was 1.14 and 1.08 for the BMP and full-scale approach, respectively. The application of the respective approach depends on the availability and quality of full-scale process SCADA data.

Determination of the dewatered digestate amounts and methane yields from the co-digestion of biowaste as a basis for a cost-benefit analysis.

Co-digestion is the simultaneous digestion of two or more substrates and a common practice at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The amounts of methane and digested sludge produced are key parameters for evaluating the economic efficiency of co-digestion. However, the share of dewatered digestate produced from co-substrates is not known. Synergistic effects in co-digestion, i.e. a better biodegradability compared to the mono-digestion of each substrate, might reduce the amounts of digested sludge and increase methane yields. However, these effects might also influence the calculation of methane and digestate quantities from co-substrates. The main objective of this work was to provide a basis for the cost-benefit analysis of biowaste (BW) co-digestion at WWTPs for this data. Therefore, continuous and batch experiments with sewage sludge (SS) and BW co-digestion were conducted and evaluated for methane and digestate production, and possible synergistic effects. BW co-digestion led to an additional production of 0.35 t total solids (TS) of dewatered sludge per ton TSadded in continuous and 0.23 t TS of dewatered sludge per ton of TSadded in batch experiments. The methane yield from BW was 441 L/kg TSadded in continuous experiments and 482 L/kg TSadded batch test. No synergistic effects were observed in both batch and continuous co-digestion experiments. Batch tests were found to be suitable for a rough estimation of the co-digestion economic efficiency key parameters. Continuous experiments are recommended to obtain more robust data. A cost-benefit analysis found that electricity production from co-digestion can generate savings of 88-170 €/t TSadded compared to grid purchase.