Endoscopic lung volume reduction coils for patients with severe emphysema-a single-centre retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung emphysema may benefit from surgical or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR). Previously reported outcomes of nitinol coil-based ELVR techniques have been ambiguous. The analysis was done to analyse outcomes of ELVR with nitinol coils in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. METHODS: From September 2013 to November 2014, our centre performed a total of 41 coil implantations on 29 patients with severe emphysema. Coils were bronchoscopically placed during general anaesthesia. Twelve out of 29 patients received staged contralateral treatments up to 112 days later to avoid bilateral pneumothorax. Lung function and 6-min walking distance were assessed 1 week prior, 1 week after as well as 6-12 months after the procedure. Patients were followed up to 48 months after ELVR and overall mortality was compared to a historic cohort. RESULTS: While coil-based ELVR led to significant short-term improvement of vital capacity (VC, +0.14 ± 0.39 l, P = 0.032) and hyperinflation (Δ residual volume/total lung capacity -2.32% ± 6.24%, P = 0.022), no significant changes were observed in 6-min walking distance or forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Benefits were short-lived, with only 15.4% and 14.3% of patients showing sustained improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or residual volume after 6 months. Adverse events included haemoptysis (40%) and pneumothorax (3.4%), major complications occurred in 6.9% of cases. Overall survival without lung transplant was 63.8% after 48 months following ELVR, differing insignificantly from what BODE indices of patients would have predicted as median 4-year survival (57%) at the time of ELVR treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ELVR with coils can achieve small and short-lived benefits in lung function at the cost of major complications in a highly morbid cohort. Treatment failed to improve 4-year overall survival. ELVR coils are not worthwhile the risk for most patients with severe emphysema.

Antibiotic therapeutic drug monitoring in intensive care patients treated with different modalities of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and renal replacement therapy: a prospective, observational single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial treatment is key to reduce mortality associated with bacterial sepsis in patients on intensive care units (ICUs). Dose adjustments are often necessary to account for pathophysiological changes or renal replacement therapy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for the treatment of respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, it remains unclear whether dose adjustments are necessary to avoid subtherapeutic drug levels in septic patients on ECMO support. Here, we aimed to evaluate and comparatively assess serum concentrations of continuously applied antibiotics in intensive care patients being treated with and without ECMO. METHODS: Between October 2018 and December 2019, we prospectively enrolled patients on a pneumological ICU in southwest Germany who received antibiotic treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, meropenem, or linezolid. All antibiotics were applied using continuous infusion, and therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations (expressed as mg/L) was carried out using high-performance liquid chromatography. Target concentrations were defined as fourfold above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of susceptible bacterial isolates, according to EUCAST breakpoints. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 105 ICU patients, of whom 30 were treated with ECMO. ECMO patients were significantly younger (mean age: 47.7 vs. 61.2 years; p < 0.001), required renal replacement therapy more frequently (53.3% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.048) and had an elevated ICU mortality (60.0% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001). Data on antibiotic serum concentrations derived from 112 measurements among ECMO and 186 measurements from non-ECMO patients showed significantly lower median serum concentrations for piperacillin (32.3 vs. 52.9; p = 0.029) and standard-dose meropenem (15.0 vs. 17.8; p = 0.020) in the ECMO group. We found high rates of insufficient antibiotic serum concentrations below the pre-specified MIC target among ECMO patients (piperacillin: 48% vs. 13% in non-ECMO; linezolid: 35% vs. 15% in non-ECMO), whereas no such difference was observed for ceftazidime and meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO treatment was associated with significantly reduced serum concentrations of specific antibiotics. Future studies are needed to assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of antibiotics in ICU patients on ECMO support.

Weaning from prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after transfer to a specialized center: a retrospective study.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is increasingly used as rescue therapy in severe respiratory failure. In patients with pre-existent lung diseases or persistent lung injury weaning from vvECMO can be challenging. This study sought to investigate outcomes of patients transferred to a specialized ECMO center after prolonged ECMO therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit (ICU) between 01/2013 and 12/2016 who were transferred from an external ICU after > 8 days on vvECMO. 12 patients on ECMO for > 8 days were identified. Prior to transfer, patients underwent ECMO therapy for 18 ± 9.5 days. Total time on ECMO was 60 ± 46.6 days. 11/12 patients could be successfully weaned from ECMO, 7/12 in the first 28 days after transfer (8 ± 8.8 ECMO-free days at day 28). In 7 patients, ECMO could be terminated after at least partial lung recovery, in 4 patients after salvage lung transplant. No patient died or needed re-initiation of ECMO therapy at day 28. In summary, weaning from vvECMO was feasible even after prolonged ECMO courses and salvage lung transplant could be avoided in most cases. Patients may benefit from transfer to a specialized ECMO center.