Consequences of a Surveillance Strategy for Side-Branch Intraductal Pancreatic Mucinous Neoplasms: Long-Term Follow-Up of One-Thousand Cysts.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to quantify the rate of progression in surveilled cysts and assess what factors should indicate delayed resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (SB-IPMNs) are increasingly discovered, making it challenging to identify which patients require resection, thus avoiding inappropriate treatment. Most incidental lesions are surveyed, yet the consequences of that decision remain uncertain. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of pancreatic cystic neoplasms was queried for patients with SB-IPMN. Patients with ≥2 imaging studies >6 months apart were included. Clinically relevant progression (CR-Progression) was defined by symptoms, worrisome/high-risk stigmata, or invasive cancer (IC). Growth ≥5 mm in 2 years is considered CR-Progression; size ≥3 cm alone is not. RESULTS: Between 1997-2023,1,337 patients were diagnosed with SB-IPMN. Thirty-seven (2.7%) underwent up-front surgery; 1,000 (75.0%) had >6 months surveillance.The rate of CR-progression was 15.3% (n=153) based on size increase (n=63, 6.3%), main-duct involvement (n=48, 4.8%), symptoms (n=8, 5.0%), or other criteria (n=34, 3.4%). At a median follow-up of 6.6 years (IQR 3.0-10.26), 17 patients (1.7%) developed IC. Those with CR-progression developed IC in 11.1% (n=17) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 6.5% (n=10). Nearly half of the cancers were not contiguous with the surveyed SB-IPMN.Size ≥3 cm was not associated with HGD/IC (P=0.232). HGD/IC was least common in CR-progression determined by size growth (6.3%) versus main-duct involvement (24%) or other (43%, P<0.001)Patients with CR-progression demonstrated improved survival (OS) with resection on time-to-event (P<0.001) and multivariate cox-regression (HR=0.205, 0.096-0.439, P<0.001) analyses. OS was not improved with resection in all patients (P=0.244). CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant progression for SB-IPMNs is uncommon with development of cancer anywhere in the pancreas being rare. Initial size should not drive resection. Long-term and consistent non-operative surveillance is warranted, with surgery currently reserved for CR-progression knowing that the majority of these still harbor low grade pathology.

Tumor Mutational Burden from Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection: An Emerging Biomarker for Surveillance: An Emerging Biomarker for Surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the utility of circulating tumor DNA in the post-operative surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current biomarkers for HCC like Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are lacking. ctDNA has shown promise in colorectal and lung cancers, but its utility in HCC remains relatively unknown. METHODS: Patients with HCC undergoing curative-intent resection from 11/1/2020-7/1/2023 received ctDNA testing using the Guardant360 platform. TMB is calculated as the number of somatic mutations-per-megabase of genomic material identified. RESULTS: Forty seven patients had post-operative ctDNA testing. Mean follow-up was 27 months and maximum was 43.2 months. Twelve patients (26%) experienced recurrence. Most (n=41/47, 87.2%) had identifiable ctDNA post-operatively; 55.3%(n=26) were TMB-not detected versus 45.7% (n=21) TMB-detectable. Post-operative identifiable ctDNA was not associated with RFS (P=0.518). Detectable TMB was associated with reduced RFS (6.9 vs. 14.7months, P=0.049). There was a higher rate of recurrence in patients with TMB (n=9/21, 42.9%, vs. n=3/26, 11.5%, P=0.02). Area-Under the Curve (AUC) for TMB-prediction of recurrence was 0.752 versus 0.550 for AFP. ROC-analysis established a TMB cut-off of 4.8mut/mB for predicting post-operative recurrence (P=0.002) and RFS (P=0.025). AFP was not correlated with RFS using the lab-normal cut-off (<11 ng/mL, P=0.682) or the cut-off established by ROC-analysis (>4.6 ng/mL, P=0.494). TMB-high was associated with poorer RFS on cox-regression analysis (HR=5.386, 95%CI1.109-26.160, P=0.037) while micro-vascular invasion (P=0.853) and AFP (P=0.439) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Identifiable TMB on post-operative ctDNA predicts HCC recurrence, and outperformed AFP in this cohort. Perioperative ctDNA may be a useful surveillance tool following curative-intent hepatectomy. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm this utility and investigate additional applications in HCC patients, including the potential for prophylactic treatment in patients with residual TMB after resection.

Expanding Selection Criteria in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-term Follow-up of a National Registry and 2 Transplant Centers.

BACKGROUND: This study compares selection criteria for liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for inclusivity and predictive ability to identify the most permissive criteria that maintain patient outcomes. METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database was queried for deceased donor LT's for HCC (2003-2020) with 3-y follow-up; these data were compared with a 2-center experience. Milan, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 5-5-500, Up-to-seven (U7), HALT-HCC, and Metroticket 2.0 scores were calculated. RESULTS: Nationally, 26 409 patients were included, and 547 at the 2 institutions. Median SRTR-follow-up was 6.8 y (interquartile range 3.9-10.1). Three criteria allowed the expansion of candidacy versus Milan: UCSF (7.7%, n = 1898), Metroticket 2.0 (4.2%, n = 1037), and U7 (3.5%, n = 828). The absolute difference in 3-y overall survival (OS) between scores was 1.5%. HALT-HCC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.559, 0.551-0.567) best predicted 3-y OS although AUC was notably similar between criteria (0.506 < AUC < 0.527, Mila n = 0.513, UCSF = 0.506, 5-5-500 = 0.522, U7 = 0.511, HALT-HCC = 0.559, and Metroticket 2.0 = 0.520), as was Harrall's c-statistic (0.507 < c-statistic < 0.532). All scores predicted survival to P < 0.001 on competing risk analysis. Median follow-up in our enterprise was 9.8 y (interquartile range 7.1-13.3). U7 (13.0%, n = 58), UCSF (11.1%, n = 50), HALT-HCC (6.4%, n = 29), and Metroticket 2.0 (6.3%, n = 28) allowed candidate expansion. HALT-HCC (AUC = 0.768, 0.713-0.823) and Metroticket 2.0 (AUC = 0.739, 0.677-0.801) were the most predictive of recurrence. All scores predicted recurrence and survival to P < 0.001 using competing risk analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Less restrictive criteria such as Metroticket 2.0, UCSF, or U7 allow broader application of transplants for HCC without sacrificing outcomes. Thus, the criteria for Model for End-stage Liver Disease-exception points for HCC should be expanded to allow more patients to receive life-saving transplantation.

The Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion and Acuity Circles on Waitlist Time, Mortality and Cost in Liver Transplantation: A Multi-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) helps increase the use of extended criteria donor livers. However, the impact of an NMP program on waitlist times and mortality has not been evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients listed for liver transplant (LT) at two academic centers 1/1/2015-9/1/2023 were included (n=2773) to allow all patients >6-months follow-up from listing. Routine NMP was implemented on 10/14/2022. Waitlist outcomes were compared from pre-NMP pre-acuity-circles (n=1,460), pre-NMP with acuity circles (n=842) and with NMP (n=381). RESULTS: Median waitlist time was 79days (IQR 20-232 d) at baseline, 49days (7-182) with acuity circles, and 14days (5-56) with NMP (p<0.001). The rate of transplant-per-100-person-years improved from 61-per-100-person-years to 99-per-100-person-years with acuity circles, and 194-per-100-person-years with NMP (p<0.001). Crude mortality without transplant decreased from 18.3% (n=268/1460), to 13.3% (n=112/843), to 6.3% (n=24/381) p<0.001) with NMP. Incidence of mortality without LT was 15-per-100-person-years before acuity circles, 19-per-100 with acuity circles, and 9-per-100-person-years after NMP (p<0.001). Median MELD at LT was lowest with NMP, but MELD at listing was highest in this era (p<0.0001). Median DRI of transplanted livers at baseline was 1.54 (1.27-1.82), 1.66 (1.42-2.16) with acuity circles, and 2.06 (1.63-2.46) with NMP (p<0.001). Six-month post-LT survival was not different between eras (p=0.322). The total cost of healthcare while waitlisted was lowest in the NMP era ($53,683 vs. $32,687 vs. $23,688, p<0.001); cost-per-day did not differ between eras (p=0.152). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a routine NMP program was associated with reduced waitlist time and mortality without compromising short-term survival after liver transplant despite increased use of riskier grafts. Routine NMP use enables better waitlist management with reduced healthcare costs.

Intensive locoregional therapy before Liver Transplantation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A novel pre-transplant protocol.

BACKGROUND: We describe a novel pre-liver-transplant (LT) approach in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) allowing for improved monitoring of tumor biology and reduction of disease burden before committing a patient to transplantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing LT for CRLM at Cleveland Clinic were included. The described protocol involves intensive locoregional therapy with systemic chemotherapy, aiming to reach minimal disease burden revealed by PET scan and CEA. Patients with no detectable disease or irreversible treatment-induced liver injury undergo transplant. RESULTS: Nine patients received liver transplant out of 27 who were evaluated (33.3%). Median follow-up was 700 days. Seven patients (77.8%) received a living donor LT. Five had no detectable disease and four had treatment-induced cirrhosis. Pre-transplant management included chemotherapy (n=9) +/- Bevacizumab (n=6) and/or Anti-EGFR (n=6). Median pre-LT cycles of chemotherapy=16 (Range 10-40). Liver-directed therapy included Yttrium-90 (n=5), ablation (n=4), resection (n=4), and HAI-pump (n=3). Three patients recurred after LT. Actuarial 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival were 75% (n=6/8) and 60% (n=3/5). Recurrence occurred in the lungs (n=1), liver graft (n=1), and lungs+paraaortic nodes (n=1). Patients with pre-LT detectable disease had reduced RFS (p=0.04). All patients with recurrence had histologically-viable tumor in the liver explant. Patients treated in our protocol (n=16) demonstrated improved survival versus those who were not candidates (n=11) regardless of transplant status (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: A protocol defined by aggressive pre-transplant liver-directed treatment and transplant for patients with undetectable disease or treatment-induced liver injury may help prevent tumor recurrence.

Machine perfusion in liver transplantation: recent advances and coming challenges.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Machine perfusion has been adopted into clinical practice in Europe since the mid-2010s and, more recently, in the United States (US) following approval of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). We aim to review recent advances, provide discussion of potential future directions, and summarize challenges currently facing the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Both NMP and hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) improve overall outcomes after liver transplantation versus traditional static cold storage (SCS) and offer improved logistical flexibility. HOPE offers additional protection to the biliary system stemming from its' protection of mitochondria and lessening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is touted to offer similar protective effects on the biliary system, though this has not been studied prospectively.The most critical question remaining is the optimal use cases for each of the three techniques (NMP, HOPE, and NRP), particularly as HOPE and NRP become more available in the US. There are additional questions regarding the most effective criteria for viability assessment and the true economic impact of these techniques. Finally, with each technique purported to allow well tolerated use of riskier grafts, there is an urgent need to define terminology for graft risk, as baseline population differences make comparison of current data challenging. SUMMARY: Machine perfusion is now widely available in all western countries and has become an essential tool in liver transplantation. Identification of the ideal technique for each graft, optimization of viability assessment, cost-effectiveness analyses, and proper definition of graft risk are the next steps to maximizing the utility of these powerful tools.

Emerging and Clinically Accepted Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death and the sixth most diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the traditional, ubiquitous biomarker for HCC. However, there has been an increasing call for the use of multiple biomarkers to optimize care for these patients. AFP, AFP-L3, and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence II (DCP) have described clinical utility for HCC, but unfortunately, they also have well established and significant limitations. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), genomic glycosylation, and even totally non-invasive salivary metabolomics and/or micro-RNAS demonstrate great promise for early detection and long-term surveillance, but still require large-scale prospective validation to definitively validate their clinical validity. This review aims to provide an update on clinically available and emerging biomarkers for HCC, focusing on their respective clinical strengths and weaknesses.

Impact of Back-to-Base Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Complications and Costs: A Multi-Center, Real-World Risk-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess cost and complication outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: End-ischemic NMP is often used to aid logistics, yet its' impact on outcomes after LT remains unclear, as does its' true impact on costs associated with transplantation. METHODS: Deceased donor liver recipients at two centers (1/1/2019-6/30/2023) were included. Retransplants, splits and combined grafts were excluded. End-ischemic NMP (OrganOx-Metra®) was implemented 10/2022 for extended-criteria DBDs, all DCDs and logistics. NMP-cases were matched 1:2 with cold storage controls (SCS) using the Balance-of-Risk (DBD-grafts) and UK-DCD Score (DCD-grafts). RESULTS: Overall, 803 transplantations were included, 174 (21.7%) receiving NMP. Matching was achieved between 118 NMP-DBDs with 236 SCS; and 37 NMP-DCD with 74 corresponding SCS. For both graft types, median inpatient comprehensive complications index (CCI) values were comparable between groups. DCD-NMP grafts experienced reduced cumulative 90-day CCI (27.6 vs. 41.9, P=0.028). NMP also reduced the need for early relaparotomy and renal-replacement-therapy, with subsequently less-frequent major complications (Clavien-Dindo >IVa). This effect was more pronounced in DCD-transplants. NMP had no protective effect on early biliary complications. Organ acquisition/preservation costs were higher with NMP, yet NMP-treated grafts had lower 90-day pre-transplant costs in context of shorter waiting-list times. Overall costs were comparable for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first risk-adjusted outcome and cost analysis comparing NMP and SCS. In addition to logistical benefits, NMP was associated with a reduction in relaparotomy and bleeding in DBD-grafts, and overall complications and post-LT renal-replacement for DCDs. While organ acquisition/preservation was more costly with NMP, overall 90-day-healthcare costs-per-transplantation were comparable.

Tumor Size Combined With CA-19 Level Improves Prediction of Survival of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Perioperative Chemotherapy and Resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Five-year survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is less than 20%. While previous studies have postulated that a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) threshold could predict outcome of resection, the role for CA19-9 in decision-making remains unclear. This study aims to assess whether CA19-9 levels combined with tumor size improve prediction of post-resection survival. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 109 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent perioperative chemotherapy followed by resection. The primary outcome of mortality was, divided into short (<1 year) or prolonged (>2 years). Univariate and multivariable analyses compared the tumor size-adjusted CA19-9 between the outcome groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (24.78%) and eighty-two (75.23%) patients were in the short survival and prolonged-survival groups, respectively. The mean CA19-9 was significantly greater in the short vs prolonged group (P < .001). Analyzing CA19-9 level by tumor size, the association of high CA19-9 and short survival was significant for small (≤2 cm) and large tumor (>4 cm), but not for intermediate-size tumors (2-4 cm). Adjusting for preoperative variable did not change this association. CONCLUSION: CA 19-9 in combination with tumor size better identifies patients with prolonged post-resection survival. This prediction is most accurate in patients with either small (≤2 cms) or large (>4 cms) tumors compared to intermediate-size tumors.

Age Matters: What Affects the Cumulative Lifespan of a Transplanted Liver?

OBJECTIVE: Assess factors affecting the cumulative lifespan of a transplanted liver. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Liver ageing is different from other solid organs. It is unknown how old a liver can actually get after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Deceased donor liver transplants from 1988-2021 were queried from the United States (US) UNOS registry. Cumulative liver age was calculated as donor age + recipient graft survival. RESULTS: In total, 184,515 livers were included. Most were DBD-donors (n=175,343). The percentage of livers achieving >70, 80, 90 and 100years cumulative age was 7.8% (n=14,392), 1.9% (n=3,576), 0.3% (n=528), and 0.01% (n=21), respectively. The youngest donor age contributing to a cumulative liver age >90years was 59years, with post-transplant survival of 34years. In pediatric recipients, 736 (4.4%) and 282 livers (1.7%) survived >50 and 60years overall, respectively. Transplanted livers achieved cumulative age >90years in 2.86-per-1000 and >100years in 0.1-per-1000. The US population at-large has a cumulative "liver age" >90years in 5.35-per-1000 persons, and >100y in 0.2-per-1000. Livers aged>60 years at transplant experienced both improved cumulative survival ( P <0.0001) and interestingly improved survival after transplantation ( P <0.0001). Recipient warm-ischemia-time of >30minutes was most predictive of reduced cumulative liver survival overall (n=184,515, HR=1.126, P <0.001) and excluding patients with mortality in the first 6month (n=151,884, HR=0.973, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, transplanted livers frequently get as old as those in the average population despite ischemic-reperfusion-injury and immunosuppression. The presented results justify using older donor livers regardless of donation type, even in sicker recipients with limited options.

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma, and Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Programmatic Proof of Concept.

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising, non-invasive diagnostic and surveillance biomarker in solid organ malignancy. However, its utility before and after liver transplant (LT) for patients with primary and secondary liver cancers is still underexplored. METHODS: Patients undergoing LT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with ctDNA testing were included. CtDNA testing was conducted pre-transplant, post-transplant, or both (sequential) from 11/2019 to 09/2023 using Guardant360, Guardant Reveal, and Guardant360 CDx. RESULTS: 21 patients with HCC (n = 9, 43%), CRLM (n = 8, 38%), CCA (n = 3, 14%), and mixed HCC/CCA (n = 1, 5%) were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 15 months (range: 1-124). The median time from pre-operative testing to surgery was 3 months (IQR: 1-4; range: 0-5), and from surgery to post-operative testing, it was 9 months (IQR: 2-22; range: 0.4-112). A total of 13 (62%) patients had pre-transplant testing, with 8 (62%) having ctDNA detected (ctDNA+) and 5 (32%) not having ctDNA detected (ctDNA-). A total of 18 (86%) patients had post-transplant testing, 11 (61%) of whom were ctDNA+ and 7 (33%) of whom were ctDNA-. The absolute recurrence rates were 50% (n = 5) in those who were ctDNA+ vs. 25% (n = 1) in those who were ctDNA- in the post-transplant setting, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.367). Six (29%) patients (HCC = 3, CCA = 1, CRLM = 2) experienced recurrence with a median recurrence-free survival of 14 (IQR: 6-40) months. Four of these patients had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected following diagnosis of recurrence, while one patient had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected preceding recurrence. A total of 10 (48%) patients had sequential ctDNA testing, of whom n = 5 (50%) achieved ctDNA clearance (+/-). The remainder were ctDNA+/+ (n = 3, 30%), ctDNA-/- (n = 1, 10%), and ctDNA-/+ (n = 1, 11%). Three (30%) patients showed the acquisition of new genomic alterations following transplant, all without recurrence. Overall, the median tumor mutation burden (TMB) decreased from 1.23 mut/Mb pre-transplant to 0.00 mut/Mb post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ctDNA positivity experienced recurrence at a higher rate than the ctDNA- patients, indicating the potential role of ctDNA in predicting recurrence after curative-intent transplant. Based on sequential testing, LT has the potential to clear ctDNA, demonstrating the capability of LT in the treatment of systemic disease. Transplant providers should be aware of the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA and improved approaches are necessary to address such concerns.

Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), or the Whipple procedure, is increasingly utilized. No study has compared laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD) approaches, and the impact of the learning curve on oncologic, technical, and post-operative outcomes remains relatively understudied. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing LPD or RPD from 2010 to 2020 with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Outcomes were compared between approaches using propensity-score matching (PSM); the impact of annual center-level volume of MIPD was also assessed by dividing volume into quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 3,342 patients were included. Most (n = 2,716, 81.3%) underwent LPD versus RPD (n = 626, 18.7%). There was a high rate (20.2%, n = 719) of positive margins. Mean length-of-stay (LOS) was 10.4 ± 8.9 days. Thirty-day mortality was 2.8% (n = 92) and ninety-day mortality was 5.7% (n = 189). PSM matched 625 pairs of patients receiving LPD or RPD. After PSM, there was no differences between groups based on age, sex, race, CCI, T-stage, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy, or type of PD. After PSM, there was a higher rate of conversion to open (HR = 0.68, 95%CI = 0.50-0.92)., but there was no difference in LOS (HR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.92-1.11), 30-day readmission (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.68-1.71), 30-day (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.39-1.56) or 90-day mortality (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.42-1.16), ability to receive adjuvant therapy (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.92-1.44), nodal harvest (HR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.94-1.09) or positive margins (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.89-1.59). Centers in lower quartiles of annual volume of MIPD demonstrated reduced nodal harvest (p = 0.005) and a higher rate of conversion to open (p = 0.038). Higher-volume centers had a shorter LOS (p = 0.012), higher rate of initiation of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.042), and, most strikingly, a reduction in 90-day mortality (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: LPD and RPD have similar surgical and oncologic outcomes, with a lower rate of conversion to open in the robotic cohort. The robotic technique does not appear to eliminate the "learning curve", with higher volume centers demonstrating improved outcomes, especially seen at minimum annual volume of 5 cases.

Risk assessment in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a two-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are ongoing debates regarding outcomes and selection. This study examines the experience of LT for HCC at a high-volume centre. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was used to identify HCC patients undergoing LT from 2000 to 2020 with more than or equal to 3-years follow-up. Data were obtained from the centre database and electronic medical records. The Metroticket 2.0 HCC-specific 5-year survival scale was calculated for each patient. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were employed assessing survival between groups based on Metroticket score and individual donor and recipient risk factors. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-nine patients met criteria. Median follow-up was 96.2 months (8.12 years; interquartile range 59.9-147.8). Three-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88.6% ( n =504) and 86.6% ( n =493). Five-year RFS and OS were 78.9% ( n =449) and 79.1% ( n =450). Median Metroticket 2.0 score was 0.9 (interquartile range 0.9-0.95). Tumour size greater than 3 cm ( P =0.012), increasing tumour number on imaging ( P =0.001) and explant pathology ( P <0.001) was associated with recurrence. Transplant within Milan ( P <0.001) or UCSF criteria ( P <0.001) had lower recurrence rates. Increasing alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-values were associated with more HCC recurrence ( P <0.001) and reduced OS ( P =0.008). Chemoembolization was predictive of recurrence in the overall population ( P =0.043) and in those outside-Milan criteria ( P =0.038). A receiver-operator curve using Metroticket 2.0 identified an optimal cut-off of projected survival greater than or equal to 87.5% for predicting recurrence. This cut-off was able to predict RFS ( P <0.001) in the total cohort and predict both, RFS ( P =0.007) and OS ( P =0.016) outside Milan. Receipt of donation after brain death (DBD) grafts (55/478, 13%) or living-donor grafts (3/22, 13.6%) experienced better survival rates compared to donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts ( n =15/58, 25.6%, P =0.009). Donor age was associated with a higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.006). Both total ischaemia time (TIT) greater than 6hours ( P =0.016) and increasing TIT correlated with higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.027). The use of DCD grafts for outside-Milan candidates was associated with increased recurrence ( P =0.039) and reduced survival ( P =0.033). CONCLUSION: This large two-centre analysis confirms favourable outcomes after LT for HCC. Tumour size and number, pre-transplant AFP, and Milan criteria remain important recipient HCC-risk factors. A higher donor risk (i.e. donor age, DCD grafts, ischaemia time) was associated with poorer outcomes.

Combining a deep learning model with clinical data better predicts hepatocellular carcinoma behavior following surgery.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common cancers worldwide, and tumor recurrence following liver resection or transplantation is one of the highest contributors to mortality in HCC patients after surgery. Using artificial intelligence (AI), we developed an interdisciplinary model to predict HCC recurrence and patient survival following surgery. We collected whole-slide H&E images, clinical variables, and follow-up data from 300 patients with HCC who underwent transplant and 169 patients who underwent resection at the Cleveland Clinic. A deep learning model was trained to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) from the H&E-stained slides. Repeated cross-validation splits were used to compute robust C-index estimates, and the results were compared to those obtained by fitting a Cox proportional hazard model using only clinical variables. While the deep learning model alone was predictive of recurrence and survival among patients in both cohorts, integrating the clinical and histologic models significantly increased the C-index in each cohort. In every subgroup analyzed, we found that a combined clinical and deep learning model better predicted post-surgical outcome in HCC patients compared to either approach independently.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on nodal harvest in clinical stage III rectal cancer: Establishing optimum cut-offs by disease response.

INTRODUCTION: A minimum lymph node harvest (LNH) of 12 is the current standard for appropriate nodal staging in resectable rectal cancer. However, the rise of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been associated with decreasing number of LNH. We hypothesize that as tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy increases, the optimum for LNH to achieve appropriate nodal staging should decrease. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent NCRT/TNT followed by resection were identified from the National Cancer Database. A JoinPoint regression analysis was used to determine the LNH for each tumor regression grade (TRG) category beyond which the rate of positive nodes does not significantly change. RESULTS: Thirteen thousand four hundred and twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 2406 (17.9%) achieved TRG 0 or ypT0 and 8210 (61.2%) achieved ypN0. Collectively, 2043 patients (15.2%) were reported to have a pathologic complete response (ypT0 ypN0). Positive pathologic nodes were found in 15%, 23%, 31%, 54%, and 53% as ypT stage increased from ypT0 to ypT4, respectively. Similarly, ypN+ rates were 15%, 36%, 41%, and 55% in TRG 0-3. No JoinPoint was identified for TRG 0, whereas inflection points were found at 6-10 nodes for TRG1 (p = 0.002) and TRG 2 (p = 0.016), and at 11-15 nodes for TRG 3. CONCLUSION: The benchmark of retrieving 12 nodes in resectable stage III rectal cancer is not consistently achieved after NCRT/TNT. We demonstrate that the LNH requirement to establish accurate pathologic nodal staging can vary depending on the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapies.

Mesh versus suture repair of incisional hernias 2 cm or less: Is mesh necessary? A propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Mesh has been the acceptable standard for incisional hernia repair regardless of hernia size. It is not clear whether there is a size of incisional hernias in whom repair would be best performed without mesh. This study aims to compare outcomes of mesh versus suture repairs for incisional hernias <2 cm in size. METHODS: Incisional hernia repairs from 2012 to 2021 for hernias ≤2 cm in width were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Those with 1-year follow up were considered. Hernia recurrence was defined using composite hernia recurrence, which combines both clinical and patient reported outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed between mesh and non-mesh using body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and drains as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 132 repairs with mesh and 71 without. There was no difference in recurrence rates at 1 year between mesh and non-mesh repairs (15% vs 24%, P = .12). Mesh was associated with a higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications (11% vs 1%, P = .017). There were no differences in 1-year quality of life scores. CONCLUSION: The repair of incisional hernias ≤2 cm without mesh results in similar recurrence rates, similar quality of life scores, and lower postoperative early complications compared with repairs with mesh. Our findings suggest that there may be select patients with small incisional hernias that could reasonably undergo incisional hernia repair without mesh. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm ideal candidates and durability of these repairs.

Update to 'A Contemporary Systematic Review on Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer'.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and half of patients present with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Liver transplant (LT) has emerged as a treatment modality for otherwise unresectable CRLM. Since the publication of the Lebeck-Lee systematic review in 2022, additional evidence has come to light supporting LT for CRLM in highly selected patients. This includes reports of >10-year follow-up with over 80% survival rates in low-risk patients. As these updated reports have significantly changed our collective knowledge, this article is intended to serve as an update to the 2022 systematic review to include the most up-to-date evidence on the subject.

Impact of autotransfusion on recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing curative intent hepatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) occurs in upto 50% of cases and drives patient outcomes. Up-front liver resection is the treatment of choice in resectable cases. There is no consensus yet established as to the safety of intraoperative autotransfusion in liver resection for CRLM. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy for CRLM at a single quaternary-care institution from 1999 to 2016 were included. Demographics, surgical variables, Fong Clinical Risk Score (FCRS), use of intraoperative auto and/or allotransfusion, and survival data were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed accounting for allotransfusion, extent of hepatectomy, FCRS, and systemic treatment regimens. RESULTS: Three-hundred sixteen patients were included. The median follow-up was 10.4 years (7.8-14.1 years). The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients were 1.6 years (interquartile range: 0.63-6.6 years) and 4.4 years (2.1-8.7), respectively.  Before PSM, there was a significantly reduced RFS in the autotransfusion group (0.96 vs. 1.73 years, p = 0.20). There was no difference in OS (4.11 vs. 4.44 years, p = 0.118). Patients in groups of FCRS 0-2 and 3-5 both had reduced RFS when autotransfusion was used (p = 0.005). This reduction in RFS was further found when comparing autotransfusion versus no autotransfusion within the FCRS 0-2 group and within the FCRS 3-5 group (p = 0.027). On Cox-regression analysis, autotransfusion (hazard ratio = 1.423, 1.028-2.182, p = 0.015) remained predictive of RFS. After PSM, there were no differences in FCRS (p = 0.601), preoperative hemoglobin (p = 0.880), allotransfusion (p = 0.130), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 1.000), immunotherapy (p = 0.172), tumor grade (p = 1.000), use of platinum-based chemotherapy (p = 0.548), or type of hepatic resection (p = 0.967). After matching, there was a higher rate of recurrence with autotransfusion (69.0% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.046). There was also a reduced time to recurrence in the autotransfusion group compared with the group without (p = 0.006). There was no difference in OS after PSM (p = 0.262). CONCLUSION: Autotransfusion may adversely affect recurrence in liver resection for CRLM. Until further studies clarify this risk profile, the use of intraoperative autotransfusion should be critically assessed on a case-by-case basis only when other resuscitation options are not available.

Combined Liver Transplant and Cardiac Surgery: Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Success.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to report our institutional outcomes of single-staged combined liver transplantation (LT) and cardiac surgery (CS). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Concurrent LT and CS is a potential treatment for combined cardiac dysfunction and end-stage liver disease, yet only 54 cases have been previously reported in the literature. Thus, the outcomes of this approach are relatively unknown, and this approach has been previously regarded as extremely risky. METHODS: Thirty-one patients at our institution underwent combined cardiac surgery and liver transplant. Patients with at least one-year follow-up were included. The Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) machine-learning approach was used to generate a model for mortality. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8.2 years (IQR 4.6-13.6 y). One- and five-year survival was 74.2% (N=23) and 55% (N=17), respectively. Negative predictive factors of survival included recipient age>60 years (P=0.036), NASH-cirrhosis (P=0.031), Coronary Artery Bypass-Graft (CABG)-based CS (P=0.046) and pre-operative renal dysfunction (P=0.024). The final model demonstrated that renal dysfunction had a relative weighted impact of 3.2 versus CABG (1.7), age ≥60y (1.7) or NASH (1.3). Elevated LT+CS risk score was associated with an increased five-year mortality after surgery (AUC=0.731, P=<0.001). Conversely, the widely accepted STS-PROM calculator was unable to successfully stratify patients according to 1- (P>0.99) or 5-year (P=0.695) survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series describing combined LT+CS, with joint surgical management appearing feasible in highly selected patients. CABG and pre-operative renal dysfunction are important negative predictors of mortality. The four-variable LT+CS score may help predict patients at high risk for post-operative mortality.