Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential significance of radiomics, derived from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in detecting deep stromal invasion (DOI), lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer (CC). Methods: A rigorous and systematic evaluation was conducted on radiomics studies pertaining to CC, published in the PubMed database prior to March 2024. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each study were separately extracted to evaluate the performance of preoperative MRI radiomics in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM of CC. Results: A total of 4, 7, and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis of DOI, LVSI, and LNM, respectively. The overall AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of preoperative MRI models in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM were 0.90, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90); 0.85, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82); 0.86, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.83) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.83), respectively. Conclusion: MRI radiomics has demonstrated considerable potential in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM in CC, positioning it as a valuable tool for preoperative precision evaluation in CC patients.

Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for differentiating mass mastitis from invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the potential value of the deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) based on ultrasound to differentiate mass mastitis (MM) and invasive breast cancer (IBC). METHODS: 50 cases of MM and 180 cases of IBC with ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 category were recruited (training cohort, n = 161, validation cohort, n = 69). Based on PyRadiomics and ResNet50 extractors, radiomics and deep learning features were extracted, respectively. Based on supervised machine learning methods such as logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine, as well as unsupervised machine learning methods using K-means clustering analysis, the differences in features between MM and IBC were analyzed to develop DLRN. The performance of DLRN had been evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration, and clinical practicality. RESULTS: Supervised machine learning results showed that compared with radiomics models, especially random forest models, deep learning models were better at recognizing MM and IBC. The area under the curve (AUC) of the validation cohort was 0.84, the accuracy was 0.83, the sensitivity was 0.73, and the specificity was 0.83. Compared to radiomics or deep learning models, DLRN even further improved discrimination ability (AUC of 0.90 and 0.90, accuracy of 0.83 and 0.88 for training and validation cohorts), which had better clinical benefits and good calibratability. In addition, the information heterogeneity of deep learning features in MM and IBC was validated again through unsupervised machine learning clustering analysis, indicating that MM had a unique features phenotype. CONCLUSION: The DLRN developed based on radiomics and deep learning features of ultrasound images has potential clinical value in effectively distinguishing between MM and IBC. DLRN breaks through visual limitations and quantifies more image information related to MM based on computers, further utilizing machine learning to effectively utilize this information for clinical decision-making. As DLRN becomes an autonomous screening system, it will improve the recognition rate of MM in grassroots hospitals and reduce the possibility of incorrect treatment and overtreatment.

Causal relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus and primary liver cirrhosis based on two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization and transcriptome overlap analysis.

BACKGROUND: Overlapping cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) are rare and have not yet been fully proven to be accidental or have a common genetic basis. METHODS: Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was applied to explore the potential causal relationship between SLE and PBC. The heterogeneity and reliability of MR analysis were evaluated through Cochran's Q-test and sensitivity test, respectively. Next, transcriptome overlap analysis of SLE and PBC was performed using the Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify the potential mechanism of hub genes. Finally, based on MR analysis, the potential causal relationship between hub genes and SLE or PBC was validated again. RESULTS: The MR analysis results indicated that SLE and PBC were both high-risk factors for the occurrence and development of the other party. On the one hand, MR analysis had heterogeneity, and on the other hand, it also had robustness. Nine hub genes were identified through transcriptome overlap analysis, and machine learning algorithms were used to verify their high recognition efficiency for SLE patients. Finally, based on MR analysis, it was verified that there was no potential causal relationship between the central gene SOCS3 and SLE, but it was a high-risk factor for the potential risk of PBC. CONCLUSION: The two-sample bidirectional MR analysis revealed that SLE and PBC were high-risk factors for each other, indicating that they had similar genetic bases, which could to some extent overcome the limitation of insufficient overlap in case samples of SLE and PBC. The analysis of transcriptome overlapping hub genes provided a theoretical basis for the potential mechanisms and therapeutic targets of SLE with PBC overlapping cases.