When will we have a clone? An industry perspective on the typical CLD timeline.

Cell line development (CLD) represents a complex but highly critical process during the development of a biological drug. To shed light on this crucial workflow, a team of BioPhorum members (authors) has developed and executed surveys focused on the activities and effort involved in a typical CLD campaign. An average of 27 members from different companies that participate in the BioPhorum CLD working group answered surveys covering three distinguishable stages of a standard CLD process: (1) Pre-transfection, including vector design and construction; (2) Transfection, spanning the initial introduction of vector into cells and subsequent selection and analysis of the pools; and (3) Single Cell Cloning and Lead Clone Selection, comprising methods of isolating single cells and confirming clonal origin, subsequent expansion and screening processes, and methods for identifying and banking lead clones. The surveys were very extensive, including a total of 341 questions split between antibody and complex molecule CLD processes. In this survey review, the authors interpret and highlight responses for antibody development and, where relevant, contrast complex molecule development challenges to provide a comprehensive industry perspective on the typical time and effort required to develop a CHO production cell line.

P450 Side-Chain Cleavage Enzyme (P450-SCC) Is an Ovarian Autoantigen in a Mouse Model for Autoimmune Oophoritis.

Steroid-producing cells contain key cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as side-chain cleavage (P450-SCC) and 17α-hydroxylase (17α-OH). They are required for steroid hormone synthesis and considered antigens associated with Addison's disease and autoimmune primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). We studied an animal model for human autoimmune POI in mice with autoimmune oophoritis induced by neonatal thymectomy performed at day 3 (TX3). We previously identified an oocyte-specific protein as a major antigen inciting autoimmune oophoritis in mice. In this study, we characterized ovarian steroid-producing cell antigens. Using indirect immunofluorescence staining, we tested immune reactions in mouse ovarian and adrenal tissue sections with sera from TX3 female mice. More than half of the TX3 mice (8 of 15) produced antibodies reacting with both ovarian and adrenal steroid-producing cells, including some that reacted to oocytes as well. We produced recombinant proteins for the three key steroidogenic enzymes 17α-OH, P450-SSC, and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) and tested their immune reactions with individual mouse sera. By immunoblotting, all mouse sera that reacted with the steroid-producing cells (n = 8) were shown to react with the P450-SCC, but not with the 17α-OH or 3ß-HSD recombinant proteins. The sham-operated mouse sera and TX3 mouse sera negative for steroid-producing cells did not react with the P450-SCC recombinant protein. Our findings indicate that the P450-SCC is a specific and unique major antigen within the ovarian steroid-producing cells. Given their similarity of predicted antigenicity, we assume that P450-SCC acts in human autoimmune POI as it does in mouse autoimmune oophoritis.

Implementation of Plate Imaging for Demonstration of Monoclonality in Biologics Manufacturing Development.

Monoclonality of mammalian cell lines used for production of biologics is a regulatory expectation and one of the attributes assessed as part of a larger process to ensure consistent quality of the biologic. Historically, monoclonality has been demonstrated through statistics generated from limiting dilution cloning or through verified flow cytometry methods. A variety of new technologies are now on the market with the potential to offer more efficient and robust approaches to generating and documenting a clonal cell line.Here we present an industry perspective on approaches for the application of imaging and integration of that information into a regulatory submission to support a monoclonality claim. These approaches represent the views of a consortium of companies within the BioPhorum Development Group and include case studies utilising imaging technology that apply scientifically sound approaches and efforts in demonstrating monoclonality. By highlighting both the utility of these alternative approaches and the advantages they bring over the traditional methods, as well as their adoption by industry leaders, we hope to encourage acceptance of their use within the biologics cell line development space and provide guidance for regulatory submission using these alternative approaches.LAY ABSTRACT: In the manufacture of biologics produced in mammalian cells, one recommendation by regulatory agencies to help ensure product consistency, safety, and efficacy is to produce the material from a monoclonal cell line derived from a single, progenitor cell. The process by which monoclonality is assured can be supplemented with single-well plate images of the progenitor cell. Here we highlight the utility of that imaging technology, describe approaches to verify the validity of those images, and discuss how to analyze that information to support a biologic filing application. This approach serves as an industry perspective to increased regulatory interest within the scope of monoclonality for mammalian cell culture-derived biologics.

Endometrial Indian hedgehog expression is decreased in women with endometriosis.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic endometrial expression of Indian hedgehog increased from the late proliferative to mid and late secretory phases in 26 healthy volunteers compared with 30 women with endometriosis. The abnormal expression of Indian hedgehog protein in women with endometriosis suggests a resistance to P action.

Indian Hedgehog and its targets in human endometrium: menstrual cycle expression and response to CDB-2914.

CONTEXT: Progesterone is critical for secretory endometrial differentiation in women, but its downstream mediators are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate endometrial expression of Indian Hedgehog (IHH) and genes involved in its signaling [smoothened (SMO), patched-1 (PTCH1), glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1), and GLI2] during the menstrual cycle and the effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 on its expression. DESIGN AND SETTING: Comparisons between normally cycling volunteers and women with symptomatic fibroids who received CDB-2914 or placebo were made at a clinical research center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Endometrial biopsy was performed on 34 volunteers, 17 additional women with fibroids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endometrial expression of IHH, SMO, PTCH1, GLI1, and GLI2 by in situ hybridization and/or RT-PCR and IHH, GLI1, and PTCH1 immunohistochemistry were evaluated. RESULTS: RT-PCR showed expression of IHH, SMO, PTCH1, GLI1, and GLI2, with significant increases in IHH (5.2-fold) and GLI1 (3.6-fold) in endometrium exposed to CDB-2914 compared with placebo. In situ hybridization showed IHH mRNA expression in glands and stroma that was stronger in secretory samples. Among volunteers, IHH and GLI1 immunohistochemistry scores were higher in the secretory than proliferative phase in the nuclei and cytoplasm of glands and stroma (P=0.0002-0.04). Compared with follicular-phase controls, women exposed to CDB-2914 showed increased IHH expression in all compartments except stromal cytoplasm (P=0.0199-0.0423); GLI1 was up-regulated in glandular nuclei and cytoplasm compared with both volunteers and women receiving placebo (P≤0.0416). CONCLUSIONS: The temporal increase in endometrial IHH and GLI1 during the secretory phase, and their modulation by CDB-2914, suggests progestin regulation and a potential role in endometrial differentiation and implantation.

Endometrial effects of a single early luteal dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914.

OBJECTIVE: To test potential contraceptive mechanisms of the selective P receptor modulator CDB-2914 in the early luteal phase. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Clinical research center. PATIENT(S): Fifty-six women with regular cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Women received a single dose of CDB-2914 (10, 50, or 100 mg) or placebo given after ovulation and within 2 days of the LH surge. Four to 6 days later, a transvaginal ultrasound scan measured endometrial thickness, and an endometrial biopsy specimen was obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The endometrium was evaluated by thickness and by immunohistochemical analysis for P-dependent markers; safety laboratory tests were performed, and E(2) and P levels were obtained. RESULT(S): CDB-2914 caused a significant dose-dependent decrease in endometrial thickness, an increase in glandular P receptors, and a decrease in peripheral node addressins. Estradiol and P levels and menstrual cycle timing were not altered. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION(S): The alteration in endometrial thickness and P-dependent markers of implantation in the absence of changes in hormone levels and cycle length suggests that CDB-2914 may have contraceptive properties.

Reduced expression of biomarkers associated with the implantation window in women with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the expression of biomarkers of implantation, glycodelin A (GdA), osteopontin (OPN), lysophosphatidic acid receptor 3 (LPA3), and HOXA10, in eutopic endometrium of women with and without endometriosis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Clinical research center. PATIENT(S): Twenty-four women with endometriosis and 23 healthy volunteers of similar age. INTERVENTION(S): Secretory phase endometrial biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Expression of immunohistochemical staining intensity and localization of GdA, OPN, LPA3, and HOXA10 in eutopic endometrium. RESULT(S): Endometrial GdA expression was significantly reduced in patients after cycle day 22. The endometrium from women with endometriosis also showed decreased expression of OPN in the late secretory phase and LPA3 and HOXA10 expression in the midsecretory and late secretory phases. CONCLUSION(S): The decreased expression of these four biomarkers of implantation may indicate impaired endometrial receptivity in patients with endometriosis, providing one explanation for the subfertility observed even in women with few pelvic implants. Because many of these markers are P dependent, these findings suggest the possibility of reduced endometrial P action in this population.