Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Biotechnol ; 61(2): 111-121, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30539414

RESUMO

Basigin is a well-known extracellular stimulator of fibroblasts and may confer resistance to apoptosis of fibroblasts in vitro under some pathological status, but its exact function in fibroblasts and the underlying mechanism remain poorly understood. The systematic Basigin gene knockout leads to the perinatal lethality of mice, which limits the delineation of its function in vivo. In this study, we generated a fibroblast-specific Basigin knock-out mouse model and demonstrated the successful deletion of Basigin in fibroblasts. The fibroblast-specific deletion of Basigin did not influence the growth, fertility and the general condition of the mice. No obvious differences were found in the size, morphology, and histological structure of the major organs, including heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney, between the knockout mice and the control mice. The deletion of Basigin in fibroblasts did not induce apoptosis in the tissues of the major organs. These results provide the first evidence that the fibroblast-specific Basigin knock-out mice could be a useful tool for exploring the function of Basigin in fibroblasts in vivo.


Assuntos
Basigina/genética , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Camundongos Knockout , Animais , Apoptose , Basigina/deficiência , Basigina/metabolismo , Feminino , Fertilidade , Fibroblastos/citologia , Deleção de Genes , Marcação de Genes , Genótipo , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Knockout/genética , Camundongos Knockout/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Camundongos Knockout/fisiologia , Camundongos Transgênicos
2.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 81(1): 1-9, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25967958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To analyze the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis and fertility of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs). METHODS: The medical records and follow-up data of 106 patients with MOGCTs who were treated at The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 1986 and December 2010 were enrolled in this study. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze the survival curves. The different prognoses among the various clinicopathological factors were evaluated using a univariate analysis and a log-rank test. The multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression method. A logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of different factors on the prognoses and fertility. RESULTS: The median age at primary treatment was 22 years (range: 9-61years). A total of 59 patients received fertility-preserving surgery, 45 received radical surgery and 94 received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 56.5 months (range: 2-309 months). A total of 11 patients experienced a recurrence, and 23 patients died from their cancer. Of the 47 patients who are alive without tumor, 45 have normal menstruation. Of the 39 patients who wished to become pregnant, 31 patients had 33 successful pregnancies that resulted in 33 live births. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed with respect to the progression-free survival (PFS; 67.6 vs. 63.3%), the overall survival (OS; 70 vs. 64.1%) and the mortality rate (15.3 vs. 31.3%) between patients who received fertility-preserving surgery and those who received radical surgery. The univariate analysis showed that the pathological types, postoperative residual tumor size, lymph node resection, and omental resection were associated with OS (p < 0.1), whereas postoperative residual tumor size, number of chemotherapy cycles, lymph node resection, and omental resection were associated with PFS (p < 0.1). The multivariate analysis showed that only the postoperative residual tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of OS, whereas the postoperative residual tumor size, number of chemotherapy cycles and lymph node resection were independent prognostic factors of PFS. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed with respect to the OS, PFS and fertility between patients who received fertility-preserving surgery and those who were treated with or without comprehensive surgical staging. CONCLUSION: MOGCTs can achieve a good prognosis after surgery and chemotherapy. Postoperative residual tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS. Moreover, comprehensive surgical staging cannot improve the prognosis. Fertility-preserving surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to have little or no effect on prognosis and fertility.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Fertilidade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Criança , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem
3.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 47(12): 898-904, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23324188

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinicopathologic factors affecting prognosis and fertility of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumor (MOGCT). METHODS: The medical records and follow up data of 106 patients with MOGCT treated at Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 1986 and December 2010.Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyse survival curves. The different prognoses between different clinicopathologic factor was evaluated by univariate analysis and log-rank test. The multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard regression method. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of different factors on the prognoses and fertility. RESULTS: The median age at primary treatment was 22 years old (range: 9 - 61 years old), 59 patients received fertility-preserving surgery, 45 patients received radical surgery, only 2 cases performed biopsy; 94 patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 56.5 months (range: 2 - 309 months), there were 11 cases recurrences, 23 cases died from cancer. Of 47 patients live without tumor, 45 patients had normal menstrual. Of the 39 patients desiring pregnancy, 31 cases got 33 successful pregnancies, resulting in 33 live births. There is no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in progression free survival (PFS; 67.6% versus 63.3%) and overall survival (OS; 70.0% versus 64.1%) and mortality [15% (9/59) versus 31% (14/45)] between fertility-preserving surgery patients and radical surgery patients. The univariate analysis showed that the pathological types, postoperative residual tumor size, lymph nodes and omental resection were associated with OS (P < 0.1), and postoperative residual tumor size, chemotherapy cycles, lymph nodes and omental resection were associated with PFS (P < 0.1). The multivariate analysis showed only the postoperative residual tumor size was independent prognostic factor of OS (P = 0.039), and postoperative residual tumor size, chemotherapy cycles, lymph nodes resection were independent prognostic factors of PFS (P < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference in OS, PFS and fertility between fertility-preserving surgery patients treated with or without a comprehensive staging surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MOGCT can achieve a good prognosis after surgery combined chemotherapy. Postoperative residual tumor size is independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS. Comprehensive staging surgery could not improve prognosis. Fertility-preserving surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to have little or no effect on prognosis and fertility.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Germinoma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Criança , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Germinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Germinoma/mortalidade , Germinoma/patologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Neoplasia Residual/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...