Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING: Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers. PATIENTS: One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS. INTERVENTIONS: The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.

Prognostic effects of microcirculation-assisted adjustment of venoarterial blood flow in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A prospective, pilot, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study explored the clinical efficacy of microcirculation-assisted blood flow adjustment in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: This prospective, pilot, randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2018 to 2021; enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the microcirculation or control group at a 1:1 ratio. Microcirculatory and clinical data were collected within 24 h (T1) and at 24-48 h (T2), 48-72 h (T3), and 72-96 h (T4) after ECMO initiation and were compared between the groups following the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The primary outcome was the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at T2. In addition to ITT analysis, analysis based on the as-treated (AT) principle was performed. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were enrolled in this study. At T2, the SOFA score did not significantly differ between the microcirculation and control groups (16 [14.8-17] vs. 16 [12.5-18], P = 0.782). Generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in the SOFA score over time in the microcirculation-AT group than in the control-AT group (estimated difference: -0.767, standard error: 0.327, P = 0.019). The lactate level at T2 was significantly lower in the microcirculation-AT group (2.7 [2.0-3.6] vs. 4.1 [3.0-6.6] mmol/L, P = 0.029). No significant difference in the 30-day survival rate was noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: This prospective pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of microcirculation-assisted VA-ECMO blood flow adjustment despite no significant clinical benefit for critically ill patients. More efforts in personnel training and newer technologies may help achieve microcirculation optimization.

Use of Electronic Auscultation in Full Personal Protective Equipment to Detect Ventilation Status in Selective Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chest auscultation is the first procedure performed to detect endotracheal tube malpositioning but conventional stethoscopes do not conform to the personal protective equipment (PPE) protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic. This double-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of using ear-contactless electronic stethoscope to identify endobronchial blocker established selective lung ventilation, simulating endobronchial intubation during thoracic surgery with full PPE. Conventional and electronic auscultation was performed without and with full PPE, respectively, of 50 patients with selective lung ventilation. The rates of correct ventilation status detection were 86 and 88% in the conventional and electronic auscultation groups (p = 1.00). Electronic auscultation revealed a positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI 77 to 93%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 58 to 99%), comparable to the results for conventional auscultation. For detection of the true unilateral lung ventilation, the F1 score and the phi were 0.904 and 0.654, respectively for conventional auscultation; were 0.919 and 0.706, respectively for electronic auscultation. Furthermore, the user experience questionnaire revealed that the majority of participant anesthesiologists (90.5%) rated the audio quality of electronic lung sounds as comparable or superior to that of conventional acoustic lung sounds. In conclusion, electronic auscultation assessments of ventilation status as examined during thoracic surgery in full PPE were comparable in accuracy to corresponding conventional auscultation assessments made without PPE. Users reported satisfactory experience with the electronic stethoscope.

Endotoxin Activity in Patients With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Life Support: An Observational Pilot Study.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) life support has become an integral part of intensive care. The endotoxin activity assay (EAA) is a useful test to measure endotoxemia severity in whole blood. To date, no information is available regarding the EAA levels and their effect on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with ECMO support. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study enrolled adult critically ill patients with ECMO support from August 2019 to December 2020. The EAA levels were measured within 24 h (T1), and at 25-48 (T2), 49-72 (T3), and 73-96 h (T4) after ECMO initiation. This study primarily aimed to investigate the incidence of high EAA levels (≥0.6) at each time point. Subsequent exploratory analyses were conducted to compare the EAA levels of venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) patients between 30-day survivors and non-survivors. Post-hoc analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of VA-ECMO patients with elevated EAA levels at T3 (vs. T1) and those without elevated EAA levels. Results: A total of 39 VA-ECMO patients and 15 venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) patients were enrolled. At T1, the incidence of high EAA level (≥0.6) was 42% in VV-ECMO patients and 9% in VA-ECMO patients (P = 0.02). At T2, the incidence of high EAA level was 40% in VV-ECMO patients and 5% in VA-ECMO patients (P = 0.005). In VA-ECMO patients, EAA levels at T3 were significantly higher in 30-day non-survivors than in survivors (median [interquartile range]: 0.49 [0.37-0.93] vs. 0.31 [0.19-0.51], median difference 0.16 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.31]; P = 0.024). Moreover, VA-ECMO patients with elevated EAA levels at T3 (vs. T1) had lower 30-day survival than patients without elevated EAA levels (39 vs. 83%, P = 0.026) and fewer ECMO free days by day 30 (median: 3 vs. 23 days, median difference 12 days [95% CI, 0-22]; P = 0.028). Conclusions: A certain proportion of patients experienced high EAA levels (≥0.6) after VV-ECMO or VA-ECMO initiation. VA-ECMO patients with an elevated EAA level at 49-72 h were associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Microcirculatory Response to Changes in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pump Flow: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) pump flow is crucial for maintaining organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock, but VA-ECMO pump flow optimization remains as a clinical challenge. This study aimed to investigate the response of sublingual microcirculation to changes in VA-ECMO pump flow. Methods: Sublingual microcirculation was measured before and after changing VA-ECMO pump flow according to the treatment plan of ECMO team within 24 h and at 24-48 h after VA-ECMO placement. In clinical events of increasing VA-ECMO pump flow, those events with increased perfused vessel density (PVD) were grouped into group A, and the others were grouped into group B. In clinical events of decreasing VA-ECMO pump flow, those events with increased PVD were grouped into group C, and the others were grouped into group D. Results: Increased PVD was observed in 60% (95% CI, 38.5-81.5%) of the events with increasing VA-ECMO pump flow. The probability of increasing PVD after increasing VA-ECMO pump flow were higher in the events with a PVD < 15 mm/mm2 at baseline than those with a PVD ≥ 15 mm/mm2 [100% (95% CI, 54.1-100%) vs. 42.9% (95% CI, 17.7-71.1%), P = 0.042]. Other microcirculatory and hemodynamic parameters at baseline did not differ significantly between group A and B or between group C and D. Conclusion: This study revealed contradictory and non-contradictory responses of sublingual microcirculation to changes in VA-ECMO pump flow. Tandem measurements of microcirculation before and after changing VA-ECMO pump flow may help to ensure a good microcirculation.