Is Self-Help Dangerous? Examination of Adverse Effects of a Psychological Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for Body-Focused Repetitive Behavior (Free From BFRB).

Despite the proven effectiveness of psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders, adverse events or unwanted effects may occur. Unwanted effects, however, are rarely assessed. In self-help interventions, which usually are not supported by a therapist, such effects have received even less attention even though special caution is needed regarding unwanted effects such as those related to misapplication. For the present study, we present the newly developed Positive and Negative Effects of Psychotherapy Scale for Internet-Based Intervention (PANEPS-I) and examine possible unwanted effects of an internet-based self-help intervention in individuals with body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), aggregating three different techniques: habit reversal training (HRT), decoupling (DC), and decoupling in sensu (DC-is). Some HRT users have expressed concern that the suppression of the problematic behavior could lead to rebound effects, but this has not been examined rigorously. Following baseline assessment, 141 participants with at least one BFRB were randomly assigned to two intervention groups that differed only with respect to the delivery mode (video, manual); the content was the same. After 6 weeks, a post-assessment was conducted. Unwanted effects were assessed using the PANEPS-I. A total of 70% of the participants (both treatment groups combined) reported at least one positive effect of the intervention. Negative effects were reported by 14-92% of participants, depending on the effect. The highest agreement rates were found for "no positive goal orientation" (52.5%), "did not address personal problems" (48.8%), "time/performance pressure" (20.9%), shame (16.3%), and concerns about data privacy (14.3%). Participants in the manual intervention group reported unethical procedures (e.g., data privacy concerns) more often (Cohen's d = .44) than those in the video intervention group. Responders reported more positive effects and nonresponders more malpractice (|d| = .80, .54, respectively). HRT users (self-report) showed no significant differences compared to nonusers regarding negative effects. Stepwise hierarchical regression analyses indicated a dose-response relationship for reported positive effects and malpractice. Side effects may occur in any kind of intervention. Usage of HRT did not lead to more reported negative effects compared to nonusage. To improve the quality and effectiveness and ensure the safety of the user, especially those using digital self-help interventions, it is important to regularly assess unintended effects since there is no supervision of the patient in unguided self-help interventions.

Self-Help Habit Replacement in Individuals With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs; eg, skin picking) encompass a set of conditions at the interface of dermatology and psychiatry/psychology. The disorder is prevalent but currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Objective: To compare a new self-help intervention, habit replacement, against a wait-list control condition for the treatment of BFRBs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted online in 2022. Participants were a population-based nonclinical sample with BFRBs and were recruited via social media. Initially, 481 individuals entered the assessment; 213 were excluded blind to results. A final sample of 268 participants were randomized. The intervention period was 6 weeks. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a self-help intervention, habit replacement, or a wait-list control condition (each n = 134). Main Outcomes and Measures: The Generic BFRB Scale-45 (GBS-45, self-report) represented the primary outcome. Results: Individuals in the 2 conditions (n = 268; 241 [89.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 36.8 [11.1] years; skin picking, 68.3%; trichotillomania, 28.4%; nail biting, 36.6%; lip-cheek biting, 26.1%; other, 20.1%) did not differ on any baseline characteristics. The experimental group significantly improved on the primary outcome (GBS-45) for both the per-protocol (technique was used at least once weekly, ηp2 = 0.068, P = .001) and the intention-to-treat analyses relative to the wait-list control group (expectation-maximization algorithm; ηp2 = 0.019, P = .02). The interaction of group and time yielded statistical trends in favor of the experimental condition only on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and quality of life. For the Clinical Global Impressions scale, more individuals in the habit replacement group reported improvement (52.8% vs 19.6%; P < .001). User satisfaction in the habit replacement group was high. Moderation analyses that included all baseline variables showed that those who exhibited nail biting particularly benefited from the new technique. Conclusions and Relevance: The present proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial tentatively demonstrates that habit replacement is a feasible and effective self-help strategy against BFRBs, especially for nail biting. Study limitations include the lack of external assessment and verified diagnoses. In addition, the study is missing follow-up data. Self-help habit replacement shows promise in reducing BFRBs but not concomitant symptoms. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00030511.

Habit Reversal Training and Variants of Decoupling for Use in Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Behavioral interventions hold promise in improving body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), such as hair pulling and skin picking. The effect of combining different treatment techniques is currently unknown. Methods: In the framework of a randomized controlled crossover trial, 334 individuals with at least one BFRB were allocated either to a waitlist control or to three experimental conditions (1:1:1:1). Participants in the experimental condition received self-help manuals teaching habit reversal training (HRT), decoupling (DC) and decoupling in sensu (DC-is) during a six-week period. Treatment conditions differed only in the order of manual presentation. We examined whether applying more than one technique would lead either to add-on or interference effects. Results: The three treatment conditions were significantly superior to the waitlist control group in the improvement of BFRBs according to intention-to-treat analyses at a medium effect size (all p ≤ 0.002, d = 0.52 - 0.54). The condition displaying DC first significantly reduced depressive symptoms (p = 0.003, d = 0.47) and improved quality of life (p = 0.011, d = 0.39) compared to the waitlist control. Those using more techniques concurrently showed the strongest decline in BFRB symptoms, even after controlling for days practiced. Participants rated all manuals favorably, with standard DC and HRT yielding greatest acceptability. Discussion: Results tentatively suggest the concurrent application of different behavioral treatments for BFRBs leads to add-on effects. Results were superior when DC was practiced first, with positive effects extending to depressive symptoms and quality of life. Integrating the three techniques into one self-help manual or video along with other treatment procedures (e.g., stimulus control techniques) is recommended.

The Generic BFRB Scale-8 (GBS-8): a transdiagnostic scale to measure the severity of body-focused repetitive behaviours.

BACKGROUND: Body-focused repetitive behaviours (BFRBs) such as skin picking and hair pulling are frequent but under-diagnosed and under-treated psychological conditions. As of now, most studies use symptom-specific BFRB scales. However, a transdiagnostic scale is needed in view of the high co-morbidity of different BFRBs. AIMS: We aimed to assess the reliability as well as concurrent and divergent validity of a newly developed transdiagnostic BFRB scale. METHOD: For the first time, we administered the 8-item Generic BFRB Scale (GBS-8) as well as the Repetitive Body Focused Behavior Scale (RBFBS), modified for adults, in 279 individuals with BFRBs. The GBS-8 builds upon the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R), but has been adapted to capture different BFRBs concurrently. A total of 170 participants (61%) were re-assessed after 6 weeks to determine the test-retest reliability of the scale. RESULTS: Similar to the SPS-R, factor analysis yielded two dimensions termed symptom severity and impairment. The test-retest reliability of the scale was satisfactory (r = .72, p<.001). Concurrent validity (r = .74) with the RBFBS was good (correlational indexes for concurrent validity were significantly higher than that for discriminant validity). DISCUSSION: The GBS-8 appears to be a reliable and valid global measure of BFRBs. We recommend usage of the scale in combination with specific BFRB scales to facilitate comparability across studies on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.