Dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid after a subconjunctival injection, a peribulbar injection, or an oral dose.

PURPOSE: To determine dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid of patients after a peribulbar injection, a subconjunctival injection, or an oral dose of dexamethasone and to compare the results with those of previous similar studies of dexamethasone concentrations in the vitreous. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-eight patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: Fifty patients received a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, 49 received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, and 49 received an oral dose of 7. 5 mg dexamethasone at various time intervals before surgery. At the time of surgery, a subretinal fluid sample was taken from each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid after the peribulbar injection, the subconjunctival injection, and the oral dose were, respectively, 82.2 ng/ml (standard error, 17. 6), 359 ng/ml (standard error, 80.2), and 12.3 ng/ml (standard error, 1.61). Corrected for dose, the maximum dexamethasone concentrations after subconjunctival injection and peribulbar injection were, respectively, 120 (95% confidence interval, 54/180) and 13 (95% confidence interval, 6.8/20) times greater than after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: A subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone disodium phosphate is more effective in delivering dexamethasone into the subretinal fluid of patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with peribulbar injection or oral administration. The subretinal dexamethasone concentrations were higher than concentrations measured in the vitreous in previous studies with a similar setup after all three delivery methods.

Follow-up of functionally lost eyes after vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for tractional retinal detachment.

BACKGROUND: Is there any association between, on the one hand, retention or removal of silicone oil or any specific ocular finding in patients with functionally lost eyes after vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for tractional retinal detachment and, on the other, a greater chance of preservation of the eye? This information is important in deciding whether to remove silicone oil, as well as in counseling patients about their individual chances of preserving their eye. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients with a functionally lost eye with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were retrospectively studied. The relation between the variables at study entry or the removal of silicone oil during the follow-up period and a subsequent intervention (enucleation, evisceration or conjunctival cover with a scleral shell) were tested for statistical significance with Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The absence or removal of silicone oil was not associated with a greater chance of finally preserving the eye. Nor could we identify other factors which predicted better chances of preservation. CONCLUSION: The notion that functionally lost eyes after treatment with vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for complicated tractional retinal detachment have better chances of preservation of the eye without silicone oil is not supported by our study.

High concentration of dexamethasone in aqueous and vitreous after subconjunctival injection.

PURPOSE: To determine the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous, vitreous, and serum of patients after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to compare the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection as a method of delivering dexamethasone into the vitreous with that of two previously tested routes: peribulbar injection and oral administration. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 phakic patients who underwent a pars plana vitrectomy received a single subconjunctival injection with 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, aqueous solution (after topical anesthesia and a subconjunctival injection with lidocaine) at varied intervals before surgery. An aqueous and a vitreous sample were taken from each patient, and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from nine of 50 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous was 858 ng per ml at 2.5 hours after injection, and in the vitreous, 72.5 ng per ml at 3 hours. In serum, a mean maximum concentration of 32.4 ng per ml was measured at approximately 30 minutes after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate resulted in an estimated vitreous dexamethasone peak concentration three and 12 times higher, respectively, than after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and an oral dose of 7.5 mg of dexamethasone. Thus, a subconjunctival injection is the most effective method of delivering dexamethasone into both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Systemic drug absorption is considerable and is of the same order of magnitude as after peribulbar injection.

Dexamethasone concentration in vitreous and serum after oral administration.

PURPOSE: To determine the dexamethasone concentration in vitreous and serum of patients after oral administration of dexamethasone and to compare the results with the concentrations in vitreous and serum found in a previous study with peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate. METHODS: In a prospective study, 54 patients who were scheduled for vitrectomy received 7.5 mg dexamethasone orally at varied time intervals before surgery. A vitreous sample was taken from each patient and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from 32 out of 54 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Dexamethasone concentrations in serum ranged from 2.5 to 98.1 ng/ml (median, 61.6 ng/ml) between 1 and 3 hours after oral administration of 7.5 mg dexamethasone. Serum concentrations after peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate (containing 3.75 mg dexamethasone) were lower by a factor of 1.5. Concentrations in vitreous ranged from 1.7 to 23.4 ng/ml (median, 5.2 ng/ml) between 4 and 10 hours after oral administration. After peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, the intravitreal concentrations were 3.9 times higher. CONCLUSIONS: An oral dose of 7.5 mg dexamethasone resulted in an intravitreal corticosteroid concentration with an anti-inflammatory potency that is clearly above physiological level. This concentration, however, is several times lower than is the intravitreal concentration after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, although the two routes of administration resulted in nearly equal dexamethasone concentrations in serum. The higher intravitreal concentration after peribulbar injection is probably caused by diffusion from the serum and additional transscleral diffusion.

Peribulbar corticosteroid injection: vitreal and serum concentrations after dexamethasone disodium phosphate injection.

PURPOSE: To study the dexamethasone level reached in human vitreous after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to assess its systemic uptake. METHODS: In a prospective study, 61 eyes of 61 patients scheduled for vitrectomy received a single peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate at varied intervals before surgery. At the start of vitrectomy, an undiluted vitreous sample was taken. In 22 patients, multiple serum samples were collected. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The physiologic cortisol concentration was determined in the vitreous of 12 eyes of 12 patients who did not receive dexamethasone. RESULTS: An average dexamethasone peak concentration of approximately 13 ng/ml was reached in vitreous 6 to 7 hours after peribulbar injection. In serum the average peak concentration was approximately 60 ng/ml 20 to 30 minutes after peribulbar injection. The average physiologic cortisol concentration in vitreous was 5.1 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: After a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, an average intravitreal dexamethasone concentration is reached with a 75 times greater anti-inflammatory potency than physiologically present cortisol. Dexamethasone concentration in serum, however, is several times higher. Peribulbar injection is not just a local treatment but results in serum levels comparable to those achieved by a high oral dose.

Posterior segment eye-surgery in day care?

Day care is generally accepted in anterior segment eye-surgery. In the Rotterdam Eye Hospital this option was also considered for posterior segment surgery. We were interested in the opinion of patients on this matter and therefore asked patients, who were admitted for posterior segment eye-surgery, to answer a questionnaire. The major question was: 'If your physician had given his permission, do you think it would have been possible for you to go home on the evening after surgery?'. Other questions evaluated problems in organising assistance at home and transportation to the out-patient clinic as well as circumstances after the operation, such as pain, nausea, dizziness and anxiety. Eighty-one out of 87 patients responded: 56% answered 'eye' and 44% 'no' to the major question. Relating the answer to the major question to medical data and to answers to the other questions, we found organizational problems at home and anxiety to have a statistical significant relation with a negative answer. Clinical factors like age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-class, diabetes mellitus (including insulin-dependant), type of anesthesia, time of the day the surgery was finished, duration of surgery, pain, nausea or dizziness were not significantly related. The number of patients involved in this study, however, is too small to draw conclusions on specific subgroups of patients.

Management outcome and follow-up of fetal tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate fetal tachycardia and the efficacy of maternally administered antiarrhythmic agents and the effect of this therapy on delivery and postpartum management. BACKGROUND: Sustained fetal tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening condition in which pharmacologic therapy is reported to be effective. There is ongoing discussion about optimal management. METHODS: A group of 51 patients with M-mode echocardiographically documented fetal tachycardia was studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-three fetuses had supraventricular tachycardia; 15 had atrial flutter; 1 had two episodes of both; and 2 had ventricular tachycardia. Fetal hydrops was seen in 22 patients. Thirty-four fetuses received maternal therapy with either digoxin or flecainide as the first administered drug (additional drugs were given in 12). Drug treatment was successful in establishing acceptable rhythm control in 82% (84% without, 80% with hydrops). In the latter group the median number of drugs and number of days to conversion were higher. Three patients with fetal hydrops died. In 50% of cases, tachycardia reappeared at delivery: 9 neonates presented with atrial flutter, 14 with supraventricular tachycardia and 1 with ventricular tachycardia. Seventy-eight percent of the group had pharmacologic therapy by 1 month of age and 14% by 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal tachycardia can be treated adequately in the majority of patients, even in the presence of hydrops, and therefore emergency delivery might not be indicated. Digoxin and flecainide were drugs of first choice and produced no serious adverse effects in this series of patients. The majority of patients do not require prolonged therapy.

Fetal arrhythmias.

The increased awareness of fetal arrhythmias by obstetricians and the development of sophisticated fetal echocardiography have established the basis for identification and treatment of these arrhythmias. The development of fetal hydrops is a recognized link to the severity of the arrhythmia. Fetal tachycardias have been diagnosed relatively early in gestation. They may be differentiated into sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter or fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia. The need for prenatal treatment is widely accepted and various modes of therapy are advocated. Oral maternal antiarrhythmic medication is often used, is considered convenient and safe, and provides adequate conversion. The drugs of choice at various centers have included digoxin, flecainide, amiodarone, and a host of combinations, as well as sotalol, which is gaining popularity. At birth, reentry mechanisms are often documented, with frequent relapses of tachycardia, warranting postpartum continuation of treatment. Fetal bradycardias consist of sinus bradycardia (generally related to obstetric pathology) and atrioventricular block. Atrioventricular block may occur secondary to severe congenital heart disease in the fetus or as an isolated phenomenon. The development of isolated total atrioventricular block has been seen to occur from a gestational age of 18 weeks up to term. It is invariably accompanied by the presence of SS-A and SS-B autoantibodies in the mother. Passage of these antibodies across the placenta causes inflammatory disease of fetal atrioventricular node tissue, resulting in fibrosis and atrioventricular block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)