Misdiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcomes According to the Patients' Disposition.

Background: Although abdominal pain is one of the most common complaints of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), and acute appendicitis is a leading surgical differential diagnosis of patients presenting with abdominal pain, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains challenging. We examined the missed diagnosis rate of acute appendicitis in one ED and evaluated the association between disposition (discharge home or hospitalization in the wrong department) and complicated appendicitis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis and periappendicular abscess from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. Results: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was missed in 7.1% of patients (90/1,268) at their first ED encounter: 44 were discharged, and 47 were hospitalized with a wrong diagnosis (1 female patient was both discharged and then hospitalized with an incorrect diagnosis). Compared to the patients who were correctly diagnosed, patients with a missed diagnosis were older (median age 29 years vs 23 years, P=0.022), their time between ED first encounter and surgery was longer (median 29.5 hours vs 9.3 hours, P<0.001), and their rate of complicated appendicitis was higher (54.4% vs 27.5%, P<0.001). Missed females were more commonly hospitalized (26/39), while missed males were more commonly discharged from the ED (31/52) (P=0.019). No differences in the time between the first ED encounter and surgery (29.6 hours vs 29.6 hours, P=0.29) and the rate of complicated appendicitis (63.8% vs 43.2%, P=0.06) were noted between hospitalized patients with a wrong diagnosis and those discharged from the ED. Of the 25 patients with periappendicular abscesses, only 3 could be related to missed diagnoses during their first encounter in the ED. Conclusion: We found that 7.1% of patients were missed during their first encounter in the ED. Hospitalization in departments other than general surgery was not protective against delay in surgery or the development of complicated appendicitis. Periappendicular abscess was attributable to late referral rather than a missed diagnosis in most patients.

Single Sporadic Deceleration during Reactive Nonstress Test-Clinical Significance and Risk for Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence regarding the clinical significance of a single sporadic variable deceleration (SSD) in reactive non-stress test (NST) is scarce, and optimal management has yet to be established. We aim to evaluate whether SSD during a reactive NST at term is associated with a higher risk for fetal heart rate decelerations during labor and the need for intervention. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study of singleton term pregnancies at one university-affiliated medical center in 2018. The study group consisted of all pregnancies with an SSD in an otherwise reactive NST. For each case, two consecutive pregnancies without SSD were matched in a 1:2 ratio. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate monitoring (NRFHRM). RESULTS: 84 women with an SSD were compared to 168 controls. SSD during antenatal fetal surveillance did not increase the rate of CD overall or for NRFHRM (17.9% vs. 13.7% and 10.7% vs. 7.7%, respectively, p > 0.05). Rates of assisted deliveries and maternal and neonatal complications were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: SSD during a reactive NST in term pregnancies is not associated with an increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. SSD should not necessarily require induction of labor, and expectant management is a reasonable alternative.

Spontaneous labor patterns among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated spontaneous labor patterns among women achieving a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), without a previous vaginal delivery in relation to nulliparous women. METHODS: This historical cohort study included 422 women attempting VBAC and 150 nulliparas. We examined time intervals for each centimeter of cervical dilation and compared labor progression in 321 women who achieved spontaneous VBAC and 147 nulliparous women achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Epidural anesthesia use, delivery mode, cord arterial pH and 5-minute Apgar score were also compared. FINDINGS: Women in the VBAC group compared to nulliparous women had similar durations of first (4-10 cm: 4:22 (00:54-13:10) h vs. 4:47 (1:10-15:10) h, p = .61), second (1:07 (8:00-3:21), vs. 1:34 (10:00-3:40), p = .124) and third stages of labor (10:00 (2:00-22:00) vs. 08:00 (3:24-22:12), p = .788). When comparing women who had epidural analgesia to those who did not, no differences were found between the groups regarding durations of first and second stages of labor. Interestingly, among parturients without epidural anesthesia only, the VBAC group had shorter second stage compared to the nulliparous (00:19 (0:04-1:59) vs. 00:47 (0:08-2:09), p = .023). CONCLUSION: Labor patterns among women achieving spontaneous VBAC are similar to those of nulliparous women with spontaneous vaginal deliveries.