A phase II study of two topotecan regimens evaluated in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG 146Q).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinomas. METHODS: A randomized phase II analysis of platinum-sensitive patients with measurable disease was performed independently assessing intravenous topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 daily×5 every 21 days (regimen I) and topotecan 4.0 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (regimen II). All patients were treated until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity, or patient refusal. Insufficient accrual related to regimen I resulted in a redesign of the study as a single arm phase II trial assessing only regimen II. More complete efficacy data is presented for regimen II as enrollment on regimen I was insufficient for some analyses. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible. Fifteen patients received regimen I, while 65 patients were treated with regimen II. The response rate on regimen I (daily×5) was 27% (90% CI: 10-51%) and 12% (90% CI: 6-21%) on regimen II (weekly). The median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 27.8 months, respectively, for regimen II. Grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 93% with daily×5 dosing and 28% for weekly treatment. Febrile neutropenia was very low in both groups. CONCLUSION: The weekly regimen of topotecan appeared less active but resulted in less toxicity than the daily regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy in the United States. Age has been associated with worse outcome in univariate analysis. However, the patterns of failure and associated risk factors in older patients remain unclear. We reviewed our institution's experience to assess the effect of age in a population of endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. METHODS: From 1992-2002, 243 endometrial cancer patients underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation. Forty-nine patients with stage I-II (occult) endometrial adenocarcinoma (no clear cell or serous papillary) were treated postoperatively with vaginal intracavitary high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy alone using Iridium-192 (median dose 30 Gy) to a median length of 4 cm. Forty-eight patients with stage I-III endometrial adenocarcinoma (no clear cell or papillary serous) were treated with postoperative pelvic RT (median dose 45 Gy) and intracavitary HDR brachytherapy (median dose 20 Gy). One hundred forty-six patients underwent postoperative whole abdomino-pelvic irradiation (WAPI) secondary to unfavorable histology (clear cell or serous papillary) or two of the following: deep myometrial invasion, grade 3, or FIGO stage III. Age was analyzed as a continuous and a categorical variable. The age of 63 year split the age group using various statistical analyses. RESULTS: Median follow-up of all patients was 4.2 years. Patients grouped by age of < or =63 years or older had similar FIGO stage (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.09), treatment modality (P = 0.7), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (P = 0.6). Twenty-five percent (60/243) of patients developed recurrence. Of these failures, 15% (15/102) were age < or =63 years and 32% (45/141) were age >63 years at diagnosis (P = 0.02). For all patients, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS), cause specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 64%, 82%, and 72%, respectively. Five-year EFS for patients age < or =63 years and >63 years was 76% vs. 55% (P < 0.001). Five-year OS for age < or =63 years and >63 years was 85% vs. 63% (P < 0.001). Five-year CSS for age < or =63 years and >63 years was 91% vs. 75% (P = 0.003). Various factors were analyzed to determine an association with age. Older patients with stage III-IVA had significantly more failures than patients less than age 63 (P = 0.002). Older patients (>63 years) were found to have serous papillary histology (28%) more often than younger patients (15%) (P = 0.02). Greater depth of invasion was associated with older age (P = 0.01). On univariate analysis, older age (P = 0.003), LVSI (P = 0.002), FIGO stage (P < 0.001), grade (P < 0.001), and depth of invasion (P = 0.03) predicted for failure. On Cox multivariate analysis, older age (P = 0.006, HR 2.83), higher FIGO stage (P = 0.001, HR 1.96), and higher grade (P = 0.002, HR 2.66) were significant prognostic factors for recurrence. No difference was seen between the two age groups from date of surgery and start of radiation. The duration of therapy was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Older endometrial cancer (age >63 years) patients have a significantly decreased overall survival, cause-specific survival, and greater risk of recurrence following postoperative RT independent of other prognostic factors and/or treatment technique. The impact of treatment-related variables did not alter the age-related outcome.

Vaginal brachytherapy alone: an alternative to adjuvant whole pelvis radiation for early stage endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative management of early stage adenocarcinoma of the endometrium remains controversial. The use of pelvic radiation therapy as shown by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-99 trial improves the event free interval at the cost of increased toxicity. We reviewed and compared our results treating early stage endometrial adenocarcinoma using hypofractionated high dose rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone with the results of the GOG-99. METHODS: From 1992 to 2002, 243 endometrial cancer patients were treated with TAH/BSO and selective lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Of these, 50 FIGO stage I-II (occult) adenocarcinoma (no clear cell or serous papillary) of the endometrium were managed with HDR hypofractionated VB as monotherapy using Iridium-192 to a dose of 30 Gy in 6 fractions twice weekly prescribed to a depth of 5 mm and median length of 4 cm. The characteristics, toxicity rates, and outcomes of our patients were compared with the results of the GOG-99. The median follow up of our patients and the GOG-99 were 3.2 years and 5.8 years, respectively. RESULTS: Patient characteristics including age, stage, and grade were similar in our study and the GOG-99. The local recurrence rate in our study, the pelvic RT arm of the GOG-99, and the no RT arm of the GOG-99 were 4% (n = 2), 2% (n = 3), and 9% (n = 18), respectively. In our study, one patient failed in the vagina alone and a second patient failed in the vagina and pelvis. In the GOG-99, the vagina as a component of locoregional failure was also the most common failure site in the no RT arm 77.8% (n = 14) and in the RT arm 100% (n = 3). The 2-year cumulative recurrence rate in our study was 2%, which compares favorably with the GOG-99 pelvic RT arm (3%) and observation arm (12%). Four-year survival rates of the no RT arm of the GOG-99, the RT arm of the GOG-99, and our study with HDR VB were 86%, 92%, and 97%, respectively. Chronic grade 2 toxicity rates were reduced by the use of VB compared to pelvic RT, especially GI toxicity 0% vs. 34% (P value < 0.001), and GI obstruction 0% vs. 7% (P value = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Stage I-II (occult) endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with postoperative HDR vaginal brachytherapy has similar overall survival, locoregional failure rates, and cumulative recurrence rates to standard fractionation external beam pelvic RT with the benefit of much lower toxicity rates and shorter overall treatment time.

Improved outcome at 10 years for serous-papillary/clear cell or high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated by adjuvant high-dose whole abdomino-pelvic irradiation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the 10-year treatment outcome of utilizing adjuvant high-dose whole abdominal irradiation (WAPI technique) with a pelvic/vaginal boost in patients with stage I-III endometrial carcinoma at high risk for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including serous-papillary and clear cell histologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective nonrandomized trial, 132 patients were treated with adjuvant WAPI between November 1981 and October 2001. Forty-three patients (32%) were 1998 FIGO stage I-II and 89 (68%) were stage III. Pathological features included the following: 66 (52%) with deep myometrial invasion, 50 (38%) with positive peritoneal cytology, 89 (67%) with high-grade lesions, 25 (19%) with positive pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes, and 58 (45%) with serous-papillary or clear cell histology. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 6.4 years (range 0.6-16.1). For the entire group, the 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 77 and 72%, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) was 55 and 45%. When stratified by histology the 5- and 10-year CSS for adenocarcinoma was 75 and 70%, while serous-papillary/clear cell was 80 and 74% (P = 0.314). The 5- and 10-year DFS for adenocarcinoma was 59 and 49%, whereas serous-papillary/clear cell was 49 and 38% (P = 0.563). For surgical stages I-II, the 5-year CSS was 83% for adenocarcinoma and 89% for serous-papillary (P = 0.353). For stage III, it was 73 and 62% (P = 0.318), respectively. Forty-six patients (35%) relapsed. The first site of failure was the abdomen/pelvis in 27/46 (59%). When stratified by histologic variant, 34% of patients with adenocarcinoma and 41% with serous-papillary developed recurrent disease. In multivariate regression analysis only advancing age was of prognostic significance for CSS (P = 0.025) and DFS (P = 0.026). Chronic grade 3/4 GI toxicity was seen in 14%, and 2% of patients developed grade 3 renal toxicity. CONCLUSION: High-dose adjuvant WAPI is very effective treatment with excellent 10-year results for stage I-III endometrial carcinoma with risk factors for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including serous-papillary or clear cell histology. The low long-term complication rate with high CSS makes high-dose WAPI the treatment of choice for these patients with significant comorbidities.

Ten-year outcome including patterns of failure and toxicity for adjuvant whole abdominopelvic irradiation in high-risk and poor histologic feature patients with endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of treatment using adjuvant whole abdominal irradiation (WAPI) with a pelvic/vaginal boost in patients with Stage I-III endometrial carcinoma at high risk of intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including clear cell (CC) and serous-papillary (SP) histologic features. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective nonrandomized trial, 119 patients were treated with adjuvant WAPI between November 1981 and April 2000. All patients were analyzed, including those who did not complete therapy. The mean age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 39-88). Thirty-eight patients (32%) had 1989 FIGO Stage I-II disease and 81 (68%) had Stage III. The pathologic features included the following: 64 (54%) with deep myometrial invasion, 48 (40%) with positive peritoneal cytologic findings, 69 (58%) with high-grade lesions, 21 (18%) with positive pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes, and 44 (37%) with SP or CC histologic findings. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range 0.2-14.7). For the entire group, the 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 75% and 69% and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 58% and 48%, respectively. When stratified by histologic features, the 5- and 10-year CSS rate for adenocarcinoma was 76% and 71%, and for serous papillary/CC subtypes, it was 74% and 63%, respectively (p = 0.917). The 5- and 10-year DFS rate for adenocarcinoma was 60% and 50% and was 54% and 37% serous papillary/CC subtypes, respectively (p = 0.498). For surgical Stage I-II, the 5-year CSS rate was 82% for adenocarcinoma and 87% for SP/CC features (p = 0.480). For Stage III, it was 75% and 57%, respectively (p = 0.129). Thirty-seven patients had a relapse, with the first site of failure the abdomen/pelvis in 14 (38%), lung in 8 (22%), extraabdominal lymph nodes in 7 (19%), vagina in 6 (16%), and other in 2 (5%). When stratified by histologic variant, 32% of patients with adenocarcinoma and 30% with the SP/CC subtype developed recurrent disease. Most failures for either histologic group occurred within the abdominopelvic region. However, one-third of the adenocarcinoma recurrences were in the lung. Multivariate regression analysis (age, surgical stage, grade, myometrial invasion, histologic type, lymph node status, and peritoneal cytology) demonstrated age (p = 0.019) and surgical stage (p = 0.036) to be of prognostic significance for CSS; age (p = 0.036) was the only significant prognostic factor for DFS. Grade 1-2 gastrointestinal and hematologic acute toxicities were common. Asymptomatic bibasilar scarring on chest X-ray and mild elevation of liver enzymes were seen in almost 50% of the patients. Even though chronic toxicities were less frequent, 12% developed Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal and 2% Grade 3 renal toxicities. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant WAPI is very effective treatment with excellent 10-year results for Stage I-III endometrial carcinoma with risk factors for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including SP or CC histologic variants, deep myometrial invasion, high grade, nodal involvement, and positive peritoneal cytology. The low long-term complication rate with high CSS rate makes WAPI the treatment of choice for these patients with significant comorbidities.

Phase II trial of weekly single-agent paclitaxel in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: We wished to critically examine the level of activity of weekly paclitaxel in a patient population with well-characterized platinum/paclitaxel-resistant (3-week schedule) ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria for this phase II trial included the following: ovarian and fallopian tube cancers or primary carcinoma of the peritoneum; prior initial therapy with platinum/paclitaxel; and failure to respond to treatment (progression or stable disease as best response), or a response duration of less than 3 months, or if the response was more than 3 months, retreatment with both agents required and failure to respond a second time or the response duration was less than 3 months. Measurable or assessable disease (CA-125 response criteria) was required. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity developed, or they elected to discontinue treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (52 assessable for toxicity and 51 for response) were entered onto this multi-institution trial. Of 248 total cycles (887 doses), only 13 (1%) were modified (dose reduction or treatment delay) because of side effects. Therapy was discontinued in five patients because of toxicity (four because of peripheral neuropathy, and one because of painful fingernail beds). Thirteen patients (25%; 95% confidence interval, 13.5% to 37.5%) achieved an objective response (four by CA-125 criteria, and nine by > or = 50% reduction of measurable disease). CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) is generally well tolerated and is an active second-line regimen against ovarian cancer that has demonstrated resistance to platinum/paclitaxel delivered on an every-3-week schedule.