Instruments for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Literature Review.

Primary palliative care is a core component of nursing practice for which all students must receive formal education. Through competency-based education, nursing students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver quality primary palliative care before they transition to practice. Nurse educators in academic and practice settings should use reliable and valid means to evaluate student learning across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Expert faculty conducted a literature review to identify published instruments that evaluate primary palliative care student learning outcomes. Selected articles were required to include instrument reliability, validity, or both. The literature search yielded 20 articles that report on the development and testing of 21 instruments. Findings are organized into 3 learning domains that encompass 5 outcomes. Four instruments assess knowledge within the cognitive domain. In the affective domain, 3 instruments assess attitudes about caring for seriously ill or dying patients, 7 assess attitudes about death, and 5 assess self-efficacy. Competence and competency are evaluated in the psychomotor domain with 4 tools. Instrument implementation considerations within each domain are discussed. Faculty are encouraged to use robust evaluation measures such as those identified in the literature review to measure primary palliative care learning outcomes within a competency-based education framework.

Implementation of perinatal quality collaborative statewide initiative improves obstetrical opioid use disorder care and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths resulting from opioid use disorder have been increasing across the United States. Opioid use disorder among pregnant persons is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, along with racial disparities in optimal opioid use disorder care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative implementation of the Mothers and Newborns affected by Opioids - Obstetric quality improvement initiative was associated with improvement in opioid use disorder identification, provision of optimal opioid use disorder care for birthing patients, and reduction in racial gaps in optimal opioid use disorder care. STUDY DESIGN: Using a prospective cohort design, hospitals reported monthly key measures for all patients with opioid use disorder at delivery between July 2018 and December 2020. The Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative facilitates collaborative learning opportunities, rapid response data, and quality improvement support. Generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to evaluate improvement in optimal opioid use disorder care, including increases in linkages to medication-assisted treatment, recovery treatment services, and naloxone counseling across time, and to determine whether optimal opioid use disorder care was associated with positive outcomes, such as lower odds of preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 91 hospitals submitted data on 2095 pregnant persons with opioid use disorder. For the primary outcomes, the rates of patients receiving medication-assisted treatment and recovery treatment services improved across the initiative from 41% to 78% and 48% to 67%, respectively. For the secondary outcomes, the receipt of recovery treatment services and both recovery treatment services and medication-assisted treatment provided prenatally before delivery admission was associated with lower odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio: 0.67 [95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.91] and 0.49 [95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.75], respectively). During the first quarter of the initiative, Black patients with opioid use disorder were less likely to be linked to medication-assisted treatment than White patients (23% vs 48%, respectively); however, an increase in medication-assisted treatment rates across the initiative occurred for all patients, with the greatest improvement for Black patients with an associated reduction in this disparity gap with >70% of both Black and White patients linked to medication-assisted treatment. CONCLUSION: The Mothers and Newborns affected by Opioids - Obstetric initiative was associated with improvement in optimal opioid use disorder care for pregnant patients across Illinois hospitals, additionally racial disparities in opioid use disorder care was reduced across the initiative. Our findings implicate how optimal opioid use disorder care can improve pregnancy outcomes and close persistent racial gaps for pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder.

Reduced mosquito survival in metal-roof houses may contribute to a decline in malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa.

In The Gambia, metal-roof houses were hotter during the day than thatched-roof houses. After 24 h, the mortality of Anopheles gambiae, the principal African malaria vector, was 38% higher in metal-roof houses than thatched ones. During the day, mosquitoes in metal-roof houses moved from the hot roof to cooler places near the floor, where the temperature was still high, reaching 35 °C. In laboratory studies, at 35 °C few mosquitoes survived 10 days, the minimum period required for malaria parasite development. Analysis of epidemiological data showed there was less malaria and lower vector survival rates in Gambian villages with a higher proportion of metal roofs. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the indoor climate of metal-roof houses, with higher temperatures and lower humidity, reduces survivorship of indoor-resting mosquitoes and may have contributed to the observed reduction in malaria burden in parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

Soliciting strategies for developing cell-based reference materials to advance mesenchymal stromal cell research and clinical translation.

The mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) field continues to rapidly progress with a number of clinical trials initiated and completed, with some reported successes in multiple clinical indications, and a growing number of companies established. The field, nevertheless, faces several challenges. Persistent issues include the definition of a MSC and comparability between MSC preparations. This is because of inherent cell heterogeneity, the absence of markers that are unique to MSCs, and the difficulty in precisely defining them by developmental origin. Differences in the properties of MSCs also depend on the site of tissue harvest, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the donor and the isolation, and storage and expansion methods used. These differences may be sufficient to ensure that attributes of the final MSC product could differ in potentially significant ways. Since there are currently no gold standards, we propose using a reference material to establish methods of comparability among MSC preparations. We suggest four possible "ruler scenarios" and a method for global distribution. We further suggest that critical to establishing a reference material is the need to define protocols for comparing cells. The main purpose of this article is to solicit input in establishing a consensus-based comparison. A comparative approach will be critical to all stages of translation to better clarify mechanisms of MSC actions, define an optimal cell manufacturing process, ensure best practice clinical investigations, extend the use of an MSC product for new indications, protect an MSC product from imitators, and develop uniform reimbursement policies. Importantly, a reference material may enable a consensus on a practical definition of MSCs.