Protein and RNA ADP-ribosylation detection is influenced by sample preparation and reagents used.

The modification of substrates with ADP-ribose (ADPr) is important in, for example, antiviral immunity and cancer. Recently, several reagents were developed to detect ADP-ribosylation; however, it is unknown whether they recognise ADPr, specific amino acid-ADPr linkages, or ADPr with the surrounding protein backbone. We first optimised methods to prepare extracts containing ADPr-proteins and observe that depending on the amino acid modified, the modification is heatlabile. We tested the reactivity of available reagents with diverse ADP-ribosylated protein and RNA substrates and observed that not all reagents are equally suited for all substrates. Next, we determined cross-reactivity with adenylylated RNA, AMPylated proteins, and metabolites, including NADH, which are detected by some reagents. Lastly, we analysed ADP-ribosylation using confocal microscopy, where depending on the fixation method, either mitochondrion, nucleus, or nucleolus is stained. This study allows future work dissecting the function of ADP-ribosylation in cells, both on protein and on RNA substrates, as we optimised sample preparation methods and have defined the reagents suitable for specific methods and substrates.

ADP-ribosylation of RNA in mammalian cells is mediated by TRPT1 and multiple PARPs.

RNA function relies heavily on posttranscriptional modifications. Recently, it was shown that certain PARPs and TRPT1 can ADP-ribosylate RNA in vitro. Traditionally, intracellular ADP-ribosylation has been considered mainly as a protein posttranslational modification. To date, it is not clear whether RNA ADP-ribosylation occurs in cells. Here we present evidence that different RNA species are ADP-ribosylated in human cells. The modification of cellular RNA is mediated by several transferases such as TRPT1, PARP10, PARP11, PARP12 and PARP15 and is counteracted by different hydrolases including TARG1, PARG and ARH3. In addition, diverse cellular stressors can modulate the content of ADP-ribosylated RNA in cells. We next investigated potential consequences of ADP-ribosylation for RNA and found that ADPr-capped mRNA is protected against XRN1 mediated degradation but is not translated. T4 RNA ligase 1 can ligate ADPr-RNA in absence of ATP, resulting in the incorporation of an abasic site. We thus provide the first evidence of RNA ADP-ribosylation in mammalian cells and postulate potential functions of this novel RNA modification.

ADP-ribosylation of RNA and DNA: from in vitro characterization to in vivo function.

The functionality of DNA, RNA and proteins is altered dynamically in response to physiological and pathological cues, partly achieved by their modification. While the modification of proteins with ADP-ribose has been well studied, nucleic acids were only recently identified as substrates for ADP-ribosylation by mammalian enzymes. RNA and DNA can be ADP-ribosylated by specific ADP-ribosyltransferases such as PARP1-3, PARP10 and tRNA 2'-phosphotransferase (TRPT1). Evidence suggests that these enzymes display different preferences towards different oligonucleotides. These reactions are reversed by ADP-ribosylhydrolases of the macrodomain and ARH families, such as MACROD1, TARG1, PARG, ARH1 and ARH3. Most findings derive from in vitro experiments using recombinant components, leaving the relevance of this modification in cells unclear. In this Survey and Summary, we provide an overview of the enzymes that ADP-ribosylate nucleic acids, the reversing hydrolases, and the substrates' requirements. Drawing on data available for other organisms, such as pierisin1 from cabbage butterflies and the bacterial toxin-antitoxin system DarT-DarG, we discuss possible functions for nucleic acid ADP-ribosylation in mammals. Hypothesized roles for nucleic acid ADP-ribosylation include functions in DNA damage repair, in antiviral immunity or as non-conventional RNA cap. Lastly, we assess various methods potentially suitable for future studies of nucleic acid ADP-ribosylation.

A hybrid approach reveals the allosteric regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I.

Guanosine triphosphate (GTP) cyclohydrolase I (GCH1) catalyzes the conversion of GTP to dihydroneopterin triphosphate (H2NTP), the initiating step in the biosynthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). Besides other roles, BH4 functions as cofactor in neurotransmitter biosynthesis. The BH4 biosynthetic pathway and GCH1 have been identified as promising targets to treat pain disorders in patients. The function of mammalian GCH1s is regulated by a metabolic sensing mechanism involving a regulator protein, GCH1 feedback regulatory protein (GFRP). GFRP binds to GCH1 to form inhibited or activated complexes dependent on availability of cofactor ligands, BH4 and phenylalanine, respectively. We determined high-resolution structures of human GCH1-GFRP complexes by cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM). Cryo-EM revealed structural flexibility of specific and relevant surface lining loops, which previously was not detected by X-ray crystallography due to crystal packing effects. Further, we studied allosteric regulation of isolated GCH1 by X-ray crystallography. Using the combined structural information, we are able to obtain a comprehensive picture of the mechanism of allosteric regulation. Local rearrangements in the allosteric pocket upon BH4 binding result in drastic changes in the quaternary structure of the enzyme, leading to a more compact, tense form of the inhibited protein, and translocate to the active site, leading to an open, more flexible structure of its surroundings. Inhibition of the enzymatic activity is not a result of hindrance of substrate binding, but rather a consequence of accelerated substrate binding kinetics as shown by saturation transfer difference NMR (STD-NMR) and site-directed mutagenesis. We propose a dissociation rate controlled mechanism of allosteric, noncompetitive inhibition.