Isolated Pre-existing HLA-DP Donor-Specific Antibodies are Associated With Poorer Outcomes in Renal Transplantation.

Introduction: The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in renal transplantation has long been recognized, but the significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP antibodies remains less clear. We performed a retrospective single center study of renal transplants with pre-existing isolated HLA-DP-DSAs to assess clinical outcomes. Methods: Twenty-three patients with isolated HLA-DP-DSAs were compared with 3 control groups as follows: standard immunological risk (calculated reaction frequency [cRF] < 85%, no current or historical DSA, no repeat mismatched antigens with previous transplants, n = 46), highly sensitized (cRF > 85%, n = 27), and patients with HLA-DP antibodies that were not donor-specific (n = 18). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)-free and graft survival. Factors in the final multivariable models included patient group, % cRF, B-cell flow crossmatch (BFXM) positivity and regrafts. Results: Over a median follow-up of 1197 days, 65% of HLA-DP-DSA patients had ABMR on indication biopsies, and 30% of HLA-DP-DSA patients lost their graft. Pre-existing HLA-DP DSAs remained the single factor associated with ABMR after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.578, P = 0.012). Patients with HLA-DP DSAs had increased microvascular scores (P = 0.0346) and worse transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.015) on biopsy compared with the standard immunological risk group. Furthermore, flow crossmatch (FXM) positivity did not help inform on the risk of graft failure or ABMR in patients with preformed DP-DSA. Conclusion: Transplants with pre-existing HLA-DP-DSAs should be considered high risk. Routine laboratory tests are unable to further risk stratify these patients. Recipients should be considered for intensified immunosuppression and closely monitored.

A role for human leucocyte antigens in the susceptibility to SARS-Cov-2 infection observed in transplant patients.

We analysed data from 80 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA who had previously been HLA typed to support transplantation. Data were combined from two adjacent centres in Manchester and Leeds to achieve a sufficient number for early analysis. HLA frequencies observed were compared against two control populations: first, against published frequencies in a UK deceased donor population (n = 10,000) representing the target population of the virus, and second, using a cohort of individuals from the combined transplant waiting lists of both centres (n = 308), representing a comparator group of unaffected individuals of the same demographic. We report a significant HLA association with HLA- DQB1*06 (53% vs. 36%; p < .012; OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.94-3.22) and infection. A bias towards an increased representation of HLA-A*26, HLA-DRB1*15, HLA-DRB1*10 and DRB1*11 was also noted but these were either only significant using the UK donor controls, or did not remain significant after correction for multiple tests. Likewise, HLA-A*02, HLA-B*44 and HLA-C*05 may exert a protective effect, but these associations did not remain significant after correction for multiple tests. This is relevant information for the clinical management of patients in the setting of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and potentially in risk-assessing staff interactions with infected patients.

Prognostic imaging biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease (iBEAt): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains one of the leading causes of premature death in diabetes. DKD is classified on albuminuria and reduced kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) but these have modest value for predicting future renal status. There is an unmet need for biomarkers that can be used in clinical settings which also improve prediction of renal decline on top of routinely available data, particularly in the early stages. The iBEAt study of the BEAt-DKD project aims to determine whether renal imaging biomarkers (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US)) provide insight into the pathogenesis and heterogeneity of DKD (primary aim) and whether they have potential as prognostic biomarkers in DKD (secondary aim). METHODS: iBEAt is a prospective multi-centre observational cohort study recruiting 500 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73m2. At baseline, blood and urine will be collected, clinical examinations will be performed, and medical history will be obtained. These assessments will be repeated annually for 3 years. At baseline each participant will also undergo quantitative renal MRI and US with central processing of MRI images. Biological samples will be stored in a central laboratory for biomarker and validation studies, and data in a central data depository. Data analysis will explore the potential associations between imaging biomarkers and renal function, and whether the imaging biomarkers improve the prediction of DKD progression. Ancillary substudies will: (1) validate imaging biomarkers against renal histopathology; (2) validate MRI based renal blood flow measurements against H2O15 positron-emission tomography (PET); (3) validate methods for (semi-)automated processing of renal MRI; (4) examine longitudinal changes in imaging biomarkers; (5) examine whether glycocalyx and microvascular measures are associated with imaging biomarkers and eGFR decline; (6) explore whether the findings in T2D can be extrapolated to type 1 diabetes. DISCUSSION: iBEAt is the largest DKD imaging study to date and will provide valuable insights into the progression and heterogeneity of DKD. The results may contribute to a more personalised approach to DKD management in patients with T2D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03716401 ).

Glibenclamide inhibits BK polyomavirus infection in kidney cells through CFTR blockade.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous pathogen in the human population that is asymptomatic in healthy individuals, but can be life-threatening in those undergoing kidney transplant. To-date, no vaccines or anti-viral therapies are available to treat human BKPyV infections. New therapeutic strategies are urgently required. In this study, using a rational pharmacological screening regimen of known ion channel modulating compounds, we show that BKPyV requires cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) activity to infect primary renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Disrupting CFTR function through treatment with the clinically available drug glibenclamide, the CFTR inhibitor CFTR172, or CFTR-silencing, all reduced BKPyV infection. Specifically, time of addition assays and the assessment of the exposure of VP2/VP3 minor capsid proteins indicated a role for CFTR during BKPyV transport to the endoplasmic reticulum, an essential step during the early stages of BKPyV infection. We thus establish CFTR as an important host-factor in the BKPyV life cycle and reveal CFTR modulators as potential anti-BKPyV therapies.

Renal transplant from infant and neonatal donors is a feasible option for the treatment of end-stage renal disease but is associated with increased early graft loss.

Kidney transplants from young pediatric donors are uncommonly performed in the UK. Published literature of kidney transplant from donors weighing less than 5 kg is sparse. We present our initial experience of en bloc kidney transplantation (EKT) from donors weighing less than 20 kg, including neonatal donors. All recipients undergoing EKT from donors under 20 kg at our center from January 2005 to October 2016 were included. Donor and recipient details were recorded from a prospective database. Electronic patient records were examined for follow-up data. Of 30 EKTs included, 15 were from ≤5 kg donors and 15 from >5 kg donors (median weight 3.4 and 12.7 kg, respectively). One-year graft survival for ≤5 kg and >5 kg donors for EKT was 86.7% and 93.3% (P = 0.85), respectively. Progressive improvement in estimated GFR (eGFR) was noted in both donor categories through first-year posttransplant but in the ≤5 kg donor category significant improvement was seen at 12 months compared to 3 months after transplantation (median eGFR 37.3 vs 70.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.03). Two early graft losses were attributable to early vascular complications and one graft loss due to primary nonfunction. Our data show that kidney transplantation from such donors is a feasible option at centers with experience of EKT, albeit with increased risk of early graft loss.

Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation permits safe steroid avoidance with tacrolimus monotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of alemtuzumab as induction immunosuppression for renal transplantation introduces the possibility of long-term tacrolimus monotherapy, avoiding maintenance with both corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing two steroid avoidance regimens between December 2006 and November 2010. One hundred and sixteen adult patients were randomized to either basiliximab induction followed by tacrolimus and MMF maintenance or to alemtuzumab induction followed by tacrolimus monotherapy. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of isotopic glomerular filtration rate at 1 year; secondary endpoints included patient and graft survival, incidence of delayed graft function, and incidence and severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched for all baseline demographics. Isotopic glomerular filtration rate was comparable between the groups at 1 year (57±26 mL/min for alemtuzumab group and 53±21 mL/min for basiliximab group; P=0.42). Secondary endpoints were also similar between the groups. The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection by 12 months was lower in the alemtuzumab group (n=6 vs. n=14 in basiliximab arm) just reaching statistical significance (P=0.049); however, a single extra case in the alemtuzumab arm included when considering clinically treated rejection removes this significance (P=0.082). Similar rates of cardiovascular, infective, and neoplastic complications were observed in both groups. Forty-seven (81.0%) of the patients in the alemtuzumab group remained on tacrolimus monotherapy at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation with alemtuzumab induction followed by tacrolimus monotherapy leads to good graft and patient outcomes, with no major differences detected compared with basiliximab induction and tacrolimus/MMF maintenance at 1 year.

Serum aminoacylase-1 is a novel biomarker with potential prognostic utility for long-term outcome in patients with delayed graft function following renal transplantation.

Early identification and prognostic stratification of delayed graft function following renal transplantation has significant potential to improve outcome. Mass spectrometry analysis of serum samples, before and on day 2 post transplant from five patients with delayed graft function and five with an uncomplicated transplant, identified aminoacylase-1 (ACY-1) as a potential outcome biomarker. Following assay development, analysis of longitudinal samples from an initial validation cohort of 55 patients confirmed that the ACY-1 level on day 1 or 2 was a moderate predictor of delayed graft function, similar to serum creatinine, complementing the strongest predictor cystatin C. A further validation cohort of 194 patients confirmed this association with area under ROC curves (95% CI) for day 1 serum (138 patients) of 0.74 (0.67-0.85) for ACY-1, 0.9 (0.84-0.95) for cystatin C, and 0.93 (0.88-0.97) for both combined. Significant differences in serum ACY-1 levels were apparent between delayed, slow, and immediate graft function. Analysis of long-term follow-up for 54 patients with delayed graft function showed a highly significant association between day 1 or 3 serum ACY-1 and dialysis-free survival, mainly associated with the donor-brain-dead transplant type. Thus, proteomic analysis provides novel insights into the potential clinical utility of serum ACY-1 levels immediately post transplantation, enabling subdivision of patients with delayed graft function in terms of long-term outcome. Our study requires independent confirmation.

The clinical significance of early proteinuria after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Late-onset proteinuria after renal transplantation has been universally associated with poor allograft outcomes. However, the significance of early low-grade posttransplant proteinuria remains uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of proteinuria 3 months posttransplantation on death-censored graft loss, death with a functioning graft, vascular events within the graft's life, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years. Four hundred seventy-seven renal transplants from a single center (1988-2003) with a mean follow-up of 122 months were divided into four groups based on the median protein creatinine ratio (PCR) during the 3rd posttransplant month (PCR<0.15 [group 1, n=85]; PCR 0.15-0.5 [group 2, n=245]; PCR 0.5-1.00 [group 3, n=96]; PCR>1.00 [group 4, n=51]). Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to study the impact of proteinuria on the various outcomes. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that even low-level proteinuria at 3 months predicted death-censored graft failure (group 1 [reference]--hazard ratio [HR]=1, group 2--HR=7.1, group 3--HR = 10.5, group 4--HR 16.0; P=0.001). The impact on death and the occurrence of vascular events was only significant for group 4 (HR: 2.6; P=0.01 for death and HR: 2.2; P=0.04 for vascular events). Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years was group 1, 48.5 mL/min; group 2, 41.2 mL/min; group 3, 31.1 mL/min; and group 4, 24.5 mL/min (P<0.001). Continued observation of group 2 to 1 year revealed adverse outcomes with increasing proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade proteinuria at 3 months is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and identifies high-risk group of patients who may benefit from further intervention.

Assessment and management of a patient with a renal transplant.

Renal transplant recipients admitted on the medical take can be challenging for the clinician. Immunosuppressant medications, reduced renal functional reserve, increased vascular risk, and propensity to uncommon infections and malignancies all contribute to make management more complex than in other patients. This article reviews salient points in the management of such patients by the non-specialist.