A Scoping Review for Debate-Style Journal Clubs in Health Professional Education.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this scoping review are to (1) describe the available literature regarding the utility of the debate-style journal club for health professional learners on literature evaluation skills and (2) report the themes found within debate-style journal club research and assessments in the context of professional education. FINDINGS: A total of 27 articles written in the English language were included in this scoping review. Published evaluations of debate-style journal clubs have been predominantly based in the pharmacy profession (48%, n = 13), but are reported in other health professions, such as medicine (22%, n = 6), dentistry (15%, n = 4), nursing (7%, n = 2), occupational therapy (4%, n = 1), and physical therapy (4%, n = 1), as well. The skills assessed in these studies often included critical literature evaluation, application of literature to patient care, critical thinking, knowledge retention, use of supporting literature, and debate-specific skills. Learners typically reported better understanding and application of the literature, and enjoying the experience more than traditional journal clubs, but note the increased assessor and learner time requirement for debating. Pharmacy learner-specific articles more often utilized a traditional, team-based debate format, incorporated grading rubrics for skill assessment and debate performance, and included a grading component for the debate in the course. SUMMARY: Debate-style journal clubs are well-received by learners but require an additional time commitment. Debate platforms, format, rubric use and validation, and outcome assessment vary across published reports.

A Curriculum Crosswalk of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for New Pharmacy Graduates.

Objective. To cross reference the core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to a complete set of educational guidance documents for the Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum to create a map for pharmacy educators.Methods. The Mapping EPAs Task Force consisted of nine members who first worked independently and then together in small working groups to map five assigned educational guidance documents (eg, Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education [CAPE] Outcomes, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education [ACPE] Standards 1-4, and the Essential Elements for Core Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences [APPEs]) to the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for New Pharmacy Graduates. Four working groups completed the mapping process during phases 1 and 2, which was followed by an independent quality assurance review and consensus in phase 3.Results. All 15 core EPA statements were mapped to one or more of the educational documents. One item from the CAPE Outcomes could not be mapped to a core EPA statement. The first five EPA statements mapped directly to the five elements of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process: collect, assess, plan, implement, and follow-up: monitor and evaluate.Conclusion. This comprehensive EPA map is the first curriculum crosswalk that encompasses a complete set of educational guidance documents including the Essential Elements for Core APPEs for the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. If adopted by the Academy, this curriculum crosswalk will provide pharmacy schools with a common interpretation of important educational guidance documents; serve as the foundation for curricular development, revision, and assessment; and ensure student pharmacists are prepared to enter the pharmacy profession.

Academic success plans in advanced pharmacy practice experiences to promote self-awareness and improve performance.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacy schools should encourage self-awareness, provide exposure to the continuous professional development cycle, and intervene early when students exhibit performance deficiencies. Academic success plans (ASPs) have been shown in other disciplines to be successful intervention tools which encourage student reflection and self-awareness. This study evaluates the impact of ASPs used during the advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) curriculum at two schools. METHODS: ASPs were assigned to students who had either a "needs development" or lower documented for the same learning outcome during more than one APPE, for poor overall performance during an APPE, or for documented professionalism issues. Average scores were calculated by assigning point values to each learning outcome assessment score (exceeds expectations = 1; competent = 0; needs development, needs significant development, remediation required = -1). RESULTS: During AY2014-2015 and AY2015-2016, 104 ASPs were assigned to 75 students (13.5% of students). The majority (89.6%) were assigned due to repeated deficiencies in the same learning outcome(s), with the most frequent being "Develop, Implement, and Monitor Drug Therapy Plans." After completion of an ASP, average scores significantly improved (p < 0.05) in 9 out of 12 learning outcomes among all students who completed an ASP. Thirteen students completed 15 ASPs for professionalism reasons, most commonly punctuality. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to 2015, Experiential Education Office interventions were primarily grades-based, not necessarily based on achievement of specific learning outcomes. ASPs were successfully used to allow students to practice self-awareness skills, to engage in the CPD process, and to improve APPE performance.

Patient perceptions of student pharmacist-run mobile influenza vaccination clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' perceptions of student pharmacist-run mobile influenza immunization clinics, including satisfaction, comfort, comparison to other experiences, and the views of pharmacists as immunizers. METHODS: A 7-item survey was designed to assess patient satisfaction with receiving influenza vaccinations from student pharmacists, to compare the experience with vaccines received in nonpharmacy settings, and to determine the impact of the experience on patients' views of pharmacist-administered vaccines. The anonymous survey was provided to patients in the postvaccination monitoring area for campus and non-campus mobile clinics from September through October of 2017. RESULTS: Student pharmacists administered 1303 immunizations to patients at 27 campus or community-based mobile clinics. Of 928 patients (71.2% response rate) completing the survey, 90.9% had previously received at least 2 prior influenza vaccinations. More than 98% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the student pharmacist-run mobile flu clinic. Similarly, more than 98% of patients were very comfortable or comfortable receiving immunizations from a student pharmacist, and 99.9% of patients rated the experience as either better or similar to previous vaccinations received in nonpharmacy settings. Although 53.4% already used pharmacists as an immunization resource, an additional 38.5% reported they were more comfortable with pharmacists providing vaccinations as a result of the experience. Only 8.1% of patients reported that they would rather receive vaccinations from a physician or nurse. Reasons cited for choosing the mobile clinic for vaccination included convenience (92.2%), cost (35.8%), and positive past experience (28.9%). CONCLUSION: Patients were very satisfied with influenza vaccinations provided by student pharmacists in mobile clinics. The experience appeared to positively affect participants' views of pharmacists as vaccine providers. Proper training, education, and skill development of student pharmacists are essential for ensuring patient safety and for obtaining and maintaining the trust of the patient and health care community.