UmuDAb: An Error-Prone Polymerase Accessory Homolog Whose N-Terminal Domain Is Required for Repression of DNA Damage Inducible Gene Expression in Acinetobacter baylyi.

In many bacteria, the DNA damage response induces genes (SOS genes) that were repressed by LexA. LexA represses transcription by binding to SOS promoters via a helix-turn-helix motif in its N-terminal domain (NTD). Upon DNA damage, LexA cleaves itself and allows induction of transcription. In Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter baylyi, multiple genes are induced by DNA damage, and although the Acinetobacter genus lacks LexA, a homolog of the error-prone polymerase subunit UmuD, called UmuDAb, regulates some DNA damage-induced genes. The mechanism of UmuDAb regulation has not been determined. We constructed UmuDAb mutant strains of A. baylyi to test whether UmuDAb mediates gene regulation through LexA-like repressor actions consisting of relief of repression through self-cleavage after DNA damage. Real-time quantitative PCR experiments in both a null umuDAb mutant and an NTD mutant showed that the DNA damage-inducible, UmuDAb-regulated gene ddrR was highly expressed even in the absence of DNA damage. Protein modeling identified a potential LexA-like helix-turn-helix structure in the UmuDAb NTD, which when disrupted, also relieved ddrR and umuDAb repression under non-inducing conditions. Mutations in a putative SOS box in the shared umuDAb-ddrR promoter region similarly relieved these genes' repression under non-inducing conditions. Conversely, cells possessing a cleavage-deficient UmuDAb were unable to induce gene expression after MMC-mediated DNA damage. This evidence of a UmuDAb repressor mechanism was contrasted with the failure of umuDAb to complement an Escherichia coli umuD mutant for UmuD error-prone DNA replication activity. Similarly, A. baumannii null umuDAb mutant cells did not have a reduced UmuD'2UmuC-mediated mutation rate after DNA damage, suggesting that although this UmuDAb protein may have evolved from a umuDC operon in this genus, it now performs a LexA-like repressor function for a sub-set of DNA damage-induced genes.

Determining cell seeding dosages for tissue engineering human pulmonary valves.

BACKGROUND: This study examines in vitro seeding of decellularized human pulmonary valves (hPVs) with human valve interstitial cells (hVICs) isolated from unrelated donor aortic valve leaflets. An assay was developed to assess seeding using precut uniform sized biopsies from whole hPVs for sequential evaluation of seeding efficiency, proliferation, and migration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scaffolds for seeding were created from decellularized hPVs using a reciprocating osmolality, double detergent, enzyme, multiple solvent protocol. hVICs seeded decellularized leaflet and sinus wall scaffolds were incubated in either static or cyclic pressure bioreactors. Low, medium, and high initial cell seeding "dosing" densities were assayed at subsequent three time points, using eight replicates each (n = 576 biopsies including manufactured scaffold controls). Metabolically viable seeded cells were quantified by MTT assay. Histology defined cell locations and morphology. RESULTS: After 24 h of static seeding with 2.5 × 10(5) cells (medium dose), 100 ± 13 cells/mm(2) (2.5%) attached to leaflets, compared with 193 ± 21 cells/mm(2) (8%) for sinuses. Subsequent 4 d in static culture yielded 894 ± 84 and 838 ± 50 cells/mm(2)versus pulsatile culture yielding 80 ± 12 and 79 ± 12 cells/mm(2) for leaflet and sinus, respectively. However, 76.0% ± 12.2% of cells in leaflets in the pulsatile bioreactor were subsurface as compared to 21.4% ± 3.9% in statically cultured leaflets (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Different seeding modes suggest a tradeoff between surface proliferation resulting in higher absolute cell numbers for static seeding versus fewer cells in a cyclic pressure bioreactor but with a greater percentage having migrated into the matrix. The medium seeding dose determined to be optimal is actually feasible for tissue engineering heart valves, and can be achieved by fairly traditional cell amplification methods.