Effect of partial neuromuscular blockade on intraoperative electromyography in patients undergoing resection of acoustic neuromas.

Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of the facial nerve during acoustic neuroma excision provides early detection of nerve injury and improved outcome. To determine whether a useful level of peripheral neuromuscular blockade could be achieved without compromise of facial electromyographic monitoring, we studied 10 patients undergoing resection of acoustic neuroma. Facial nerve monitoring was accomplished by placement of wire electrodes in the orbicularis oris, orbicularis occuli, and mentalis muscles. Peripheral neuromuscular blockade was assessed by recording unprocessed hypothenar compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). After induction of anesthesia, an infusion of atracurium (1.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) accompanied by a bolus dose of 50 micrograms/kg was administered. The infusion was then increased in increments of 0.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 until a 50% reduction in hypothenar single-twitch CMAP was obtained. Facial nerve function was continuously monitored by comparison of facial CMAPs produced by stimulation of the nerve proximal and distal to the tumor bed. The mean (+/- SD) infusion rate of atracurium was 2.55 +/- 0.75 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Decrements in facial nerve CMAPs were detected in 6 of 10 patients, and all demonstrated moderate to severe facial nerve dysfunction. In no patient was an unexpected deficit present postoperatively. Moderate degrees of peripheral neuromuscular blockade can be achieved without compromising facial nerve electromyographic monitoring.

A prospective randomized comparison of epidural infusion of fentanyl and intravenous administration of morphine by patient-controlled analgesia after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

In a prospective, randomized study, continuous infusion of epidural fentanyl citrate (group E) was compared with patient-controlled intravenously administered morphine sulfate (group P) for analgesia in 66 men after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Although both methods provided satisfactory analgesia, the mean comfort level scores were lower (that is, greater comfort) in group E than in group P at all observation times. The difference in mean resting comfort level scores between groups E and P was statistically significant (P < or = 0.05) at 9 of the 11 observation times. In addition, significant differences in comfort level scores were noted at 8 of the 11 observation times during deep breathing, 5 of 11 during coughing, and 3 of 9 during ambulation. Maximal and minimal comfort level scores recorded by each patient during the course of the study were significantly lower (that is, less pain) in group E than in group P for all four categories of activity. The percentage of patients who reported no pain was significantly higher in group E than in group P at 9 of 11 observation times during resting and 5 of 11 observation times during deep breathing. No significant differences were noted in side effect profiles or duration of hospital stay. In summary, when two effective methods of analgesia used after radical retropubic prostatectomy were compared prospectively, patients who received epidural infusion of fentanyl were more comfortable than those with patient-controlled intravenous administration of morphine, as evidenced by lower mean, maximal, and minimal comfort level scores and a greater proportion of patients with complete relief of pain.