Patient-reported outcomes predict survival and adverse events following anticancer treatment initiation in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been minimally explored in advanced breast cancer (BC), and their comparative prognostic performance against Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) is largely unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study pooled individual participant data from clinical trials CLEOPATRA, EMILIA, and MARIANNE. Pre-treatment PRO associations with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 adverse events were evaluated via Cox proportional hazards regression. Prognostic performance was assessed with the C-statistic (c). PRO values were collected via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire. All analyses were stratified by study and treatment arms. Analyses adjusted for known prognostic variables were conducted. Exploratory analysis of the prognostic performance of PROs compared to ECOG PS was undertaken. RESULTS: The study included data from 2894 patients initiated on contemporary therapies including pertuzumab (n = 765), trastuzumab (n = 1173), trastuzumab emtansine (n = 1225), taxanes (n = 1173), lapatinib (n = 496), and capecitabine (n = 496). On univariable and adjusted analysis, patient-reported physical well-being, functional well-being, and BC subscale were all identified to be associated with OS, PFS, and grade ≥3 adverse events (P < 0.05). Patient-reported physical well-being was the most prognostic PRO for all assessed outcomes. The OS prognostic performance of physical well-being (c = 0.58) was superior to ECOG PS (c = 0.56) (P < 0.05), with multivariable analysis indicating that both provide independent information (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PROs were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS, PFS, and grade ≥3 adverse events in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced BC initiating contemporary treatment options. Further, patient-reported physical well-being was more prognostic of OS than ECOG PS and contained independent information. PROs have value as prognostic and stratification factors for clinical use and research trials of anticancer treatment in HER2-positive ABC.

Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial.

INTRODUCTION: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved both overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) of patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial. However, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was not assessed directly. To this end and to generate post-authorisation data, the TALLISUR trial was conducted. METHODS: In this prospective, multi-centre, Germany-wide, phase IV study, patients with pre-treated mCRC were given the choice to receive either FTD/TPI or best supportive care (BSC). A validated questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, was employed to assess HRQoL. Secondary endpoints included OS, PFS and safety. RESULTS: Of 194 eligible patients, 185 decided to receive FTD/TPI and 9 to receive BSC. The low number of patients in the BSC-arm did not allow statistically meaningful analyses. On the other hand, treatment with FTD/TPI was associated with maintained HRQoL. Median OS was 6.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1-8.2 months] and median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 2.1-2.9 months). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (27.6%) and anaemia (22.7%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients suffering from pre-treated mCRC with FTD/TPI was associated not only with prolonged survival and delayed progression but also with maintained HRQoL.

Effectiveness of a standardized patient education program on therapy-related side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions in oral cancer therapy: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Oral agents for cancer treatment are increasingly prescribed due to their benefits. However, oral cancer medications are difficult to handle and have a considerable potential for side effects. This type of therapy requires a high level of self-management competence by the patient. A standardized patient education program provided by physicians and oncology nurses may positively influence the handling of oral agents. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a standardized patient education program provided by specially trained oncology nurses on therapy management regarding side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients from 28 office-based oncology practices from all over Germany participated in this cluster-randomized controlled study. Patients of both intervention (n = 111) and standard care groups (n = 54) received the usual oncologist counseling; in addition, the patients from the intervention group (k = 17 practices) received an education from specially trained oncology nurses. The time of observation was 3 months per patient. RESULTS: The patients of the intervention group reported fewer side effects (skin rash, pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting). Patients in the standard care group interrupted the therapy more frequently without informing their oncologist, compared to the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients benefit from a standardized patient education program provided by specially trained oncology nurses. They tend to handle side effects and critical situations better.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and central nervous system metastases: a retrospective, exploratory analysis in EMILIA.

BACKGROUND: We characterized the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases after treatment with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus capecitabine-lapatinib (XL), and treatment efficacy among patients with pre-existing CNS metastases in the phase III EMILIA study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In EMILIA, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane were randomized to T-DM1 or XL until disease progression. Patients with treated, asymptomatic CNS metastases at baseline and patients developing postbaseline CNS metastases were identified retrospectively by independent review; exploratory analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Among 991 randomized patients (T-DM1 = 495; XL = 496), 95 (T-DM1 = 45; XL = 50) had CNS metastases at baseline. CNS progression occurred in 9 of 450 (2.0%) and 3 of 446 (0.7%) patients without CNS metastases at baseline in the T-DM1 and XL arms, respectively, and in 10 of 45 (22.2%) and 8 of 50 (16.0%) patients with CNS metastases at baseline. Among patients with CNS metastases at baseline, a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was observed in the T-DM1 arm compared with the XL arm [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; P = 0.008; median, 26.8 versus 12.9 months]. Progression-free survival by independent review was similar in the two treatment arms (HR = 1.00; P = 1.000; median, 5.9 versus 5.7 months). Multivariate analyses demonstrated similar results. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 48.8% and 63.3% of patients with CNS metastases at baseline administered T-DM1 and XL, respectively; no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective, exploratory analysis, the rate of CNS progression in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer was similar for T-DM1 and for XL, and higher overall in patients with CNS metastases at baseline compared with those without CNS metastases at baseline. In patients with treated, asymptomatic CNS metastases at baseline, T-DM1 was associated with significantly improved OS compared with XL.

Impact of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression for advanced/metastatic breast cancer on survival - results from a prospective, observational study in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that continued trastuzumab therapy beyond progression (TBP) may provide additional survival benefit. Within the framework of an observational prospective study of patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer receiving trastuzumab in routine clinical practice, we had the opportunity to examine the effect of TBP in a large population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among a total of 1843 trastuzumab-treated patients, a sub-cohort of 418 fulfilled the selection criteria for the TBP analysis: 261 continued trastuzumab and 157 discontinued. Logrank tests and Cox models were used to compare survival and identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Survival from progression was significantly longer in those patients continuing trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression (TBP: median 22.1 months; no TBP: median 14.9 months; HR = 0.64; P = 0.00021). In addition to TBP, a positive endocrine receptor status, a longer relapse-free interval, no visceral metastasis, no concomitant chemotherapy during first-line treatment, and first-line response were independently significant prognostic variables for longer survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The hitherto limited evidence for TBP benefit from randomized studies was confirmed. While a number of strong disease-related predictors for survival after first progression could be identified, the positive effect of trastuzumab continuation retained statistical significance in a multivariate model.

The impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the natural course of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia as defined by the EBMT consensus criteria: a retrospective donor versus no donor comparison.

BACKGROUND: In a single-center retrospective donor versus no-donor comparison, we investigated if allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can improve the dismal course of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with CLL who were referred for evaluation of alloSCT within a 7-year time frame and had a donor search indication according to the EBMT criteria or because of Richter's transformation were included. Patients for whom a matched donor could be found within 3 months (matches) were compared with patients without such a donor (controls). Primary end point was overall survival measured from the 3-month landmark after search initiation. RESULTS: Of 105 patients with donor search, 97 (matches 83; controls 14) were assessable at the 3-month landmark. Matches and controls were comparable for age, gender, time from diagnosis, number of previous regimens, and remission status. Disregarding if alloSCT was actually carried out or not, survival from the 3-month landmark was significantly better in matches versus controls [hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.85; P = 0.014]. The survival benefit of matches remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides first comparative evidence that alloSCT may have the potential to improve the natural course of poor-risk CLL as defined by the EBMT criteria.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 2 study of a human monoclonal antibody to human αν integrins (intetumumab) in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intetumumab is a fully human mAb with antiangiogenic, antitumor properties which has shown potential therapeutic effect in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, men with metastatic CRPC without prior systemic nonhormonal therapy were randomly assigned to 75-mg/m(2) docetaxel (Taxotere) and 5-mg prednisone plus placebo (N = 65) or 10-mg/kg intetumumab (N = 66) q3w. Placebo patients with progressive disease (PD) could cross over to 10-mg/kg intetumumab alone or with docetaxel. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points included tumor response (complete response + partial response, CR + PR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All efficacy end-points favored placebo over intetumumab, including PFS (median 11.0 versus 7.6 months, P = 0.014), tumor response (20% versus 16%, P = 0.795), PSA response (68% versus 47%, P = 0.018), OS (median 20.6 versus 17.2 months, P = 0.163). Common all-grade adverse events (AEs) with placebo and intetumumab were alopecia (43% versus 26%); diarrhea, leukopenia (both 34% versus 27%); neutropenia (35% versus 23%). Grade ≥ 3 leukopenia (28% versus 17%) and neutropenia (26% versus 18%) occurred more often with placebo than with intetumumab. Intetumumab serum concentrations increased with repeated dosing and did not reach steady-state. Greater decreases in N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), C-telopeptide (CTx) and CTCs occurred with intetumumab than with placebo. CONCLUSION: The addition of intetumumab to docetaxel resulted in shorter PFS without additional toxicity among CRPC patients.

Irinotecan in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Despite generally high cure rates in patients with metastatic germ cell cancer, patients with progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with relapsed disease following high-dose salvage therapy exhibit a very poor prognosis. Irinotecan has shown antitumour activity in human testicular tumour xenografts in nude mice. We have performed a phase II study examining the single agent activity of irinotecan in patients with metastatic relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. Refractory disease was defined as progression or relapse within 4 weeks after cisplatin-based chemotherapy or relapse after salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 300 (-350) mg m(-2) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients have been enrolled. Median age was 35 (19-53) years. Primary tumour localisation was gonadal/mediastinal in 12/3 patients. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six (4-12) cisplatin-containing cycles and 13 out of 15 patients had previously failed high-dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Median number of irinotecan applications was two (1-3). Fourteen patients are assessable for response and all for toxicity. In one patient, no adequate response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was generally acceptable and consisted mainly of haematological side effects with common toxicity criteria 3 degrees anaemia (two patients), common toxicity criteria 3 degrees leukocytopenia (one patient) and common toxicity criteria 3 degrees thrombocytopenia (three patients). Common toxicity criteria 3/4 degrees non-haematological toxicity occurred in five patients (33%): 1 x diarrhoea, 2 x alopecia, 1 x fever and in one patient worsening of pre-existing peripheral polyneuropathy from 1 degrees to 4 degrees. No response was observed to irinotecan therapy. Currently, 13 patients have died of the disease and two patients are alive with the disease. The patients included in our study exhibit similar prognostic characteristics as patients treated in previous trials evaluating new drugs in this setting. Irinotecan at a dose of 300-350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks appears to have no antitumour activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer and, thus, further investigation in this disease is not justified.