Histopathological concordance between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens-implications of transrectal and transperineal biopsy approaches.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the histopathological concordance rates between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens according to the applied biopsy approach (transrectal or transperineal). METHODS: We studied patients who had been newly diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer and who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 2018 and 2022. Patients were included if they underwent a prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and if they had not been previously treated for prostate cancer. Histopathological grading on prostate biopsies was compared with that on radical prostatectomy specimens. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of the applied biopsy approach on histopathological concordance. Additional analyses were performed to assess the effect of the applied biopsy approach on American Urological Association risk group migration, defined as any change in risk group after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: In total, 1058 men were studied, of whom 49.3% (522/1058) and 50.7% (536/1058) underwent transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies, respectively. Histopathological disconcordance was observed in 37.8% (400/1058) of men while American Urological Association risk group migration was observed in 30.2% (320/1058) of men. A transperineal biopsy approach was found to be independently associated with higher histopathological concordance rates (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.01-1.75], p = 0.04) and less American Urological Association risk group migration (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.52-0.93], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a transperineal biopsy approach improved histopathological concordance rates compared to the use of a transrectal biopsy approach. A transperineal biopsy approach may provide more accurate risk stratification for clinical decision-making. Despite recent improvements, histopathologic concordance remains suboptimal and should be considered before initiating management.

The BUSCOPAN study: a randomized-controlled non-inferiority trial of a continuous butylscopolamine infusion versus placebo in patients with a renal colic not responding to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether placebo is non-inferior to continuous infusion of butylscopolamine in patients with renal colic. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) including 128 patients with renal colic (confirmed by ultrasound or CT-scan). Patients were randomized to receive either continuous IV butylscopolamine 100 mg/24 h or placebo (saline). Primary outcome is the amount of opioid escape medication used, measured in doses administered. Secondary outcomes are pain measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), side effects, and time of drug administration. Non-inferiority was assessed using linear regression with robust standard errors, with non-inferiority limit set at 0.5 units of escape medication. RESULTS: Median number of doses of escape medication was one in both groups. The number of extra doses in the placebo group compared with the butylscopolamine group was 0.05, with a 95% robust confidence interval (CI) of 0.38-0.47. Upper limit of the CI remained below the non-inferiority limit of 0.5 (p = 0.04). No differences in secondary endpoints were seen between the groups. CONCLUSION: Placebo is non-inferior to continuous IV butylscopolamine for pain relief in patients with renal colic. Based on this study and previous evidence, there is no role for continuous butylscopolamine IV in the treatment of renal colic. Trial NL7819.

Pharmacological modulation of ureteric peristalsis in a chronically instrumented conscious pig model: effect of adrenergic and nitrergic modulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of adrenergic and nitrergic signaling on ureteric peristaltic frequency and contraction force in vivo using a large animal model. METHODS: Twelve female pigs (72 ± 4 kg) were chronically instrumented with an electronic pressure-monitoring catheter in the right ureter. Nephrostomy, cystostomy, and arterial and venous catheters were left in situ. Ureteral peristalsis was recorded before and after the administration of propranolol, isoprenaline, doxazosin, urapidil, phenylephrine, LNNA (Nω-nitro-L-arginine), and L-arginine. RESULTS: α1-Adrenergic receptor stimulation resulted in an increased P max and peristaltic frequency. However, α1-inhibition decreased P max alone. Similarly, ß-adrenergic stimulation decreased P max and peristaltic frequency, whereas ß-inhibition increased only P max. LNNA administration increased P max in the distal ureter and hydrostatic pressure in the pyelocalyceal system. L-Arginine did not affect P max or frequency, but resulted in a significantly higher diuresis. Either agonist or antagonist of NO did not affect peristaltic frequency and length of contraction. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of α- and ß-adrenergic receptors, respectively, stimulates and inhibits ureteric peristalsis. The biological effect of NO on ureteric motility is regionally determined and corresponds to the distribution of NOS-positive nerves. Inhibition of NOS activity increases P max in the distal ureter and tonic activity of the ureteric muscle resulting in higher hydrostatic pressure in the renal pelvis.