RESUMO
Plant homeodomain finger protein 8 (PHF8) has been reported to participate in cancer development and metastasis of various types of tumors. However, little is known about the functional mechanism of PHF8 in gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the PHF8 expression pattern and function, and the role of the MYC/miRNA/PHF8 axis in GC. PHF8 expression was upregulated in GC tissues and cells as measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. PHF8 knockdown suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells, as determined using the CCK-8 assay and Transwell assay. MicroRNA-22-3p targeted PHF8, as verified by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. MYC upregulated the protein expression of PHF8 but had no effect on PHF8 mRNA expression. MYC regulates PHF8 by affecting the stability of miR-22-3p. We identified a novel MYC/miR-22-3p/PHF8 regulatory axis in GC. Therefore, PHF8 may provide a new therapeutic target for patients with GC.
Assuntos
Histona Desmetilases/genética , MicroRNAs/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-myc/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Apoptose/genética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Movimento Celular/genética , Proliferação de Células/genética , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/genética , Técnicas de Silenciamento de Genes , Humanos , Masculino , Invasividade Neoplásica/genética , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the mammographic imaging findings and pathologic changes of the so-called "triple-negative" breast cancer (ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(-) breast cancer), and to compare them with the ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) and ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(+) breast cancer patients. METHODS: Five hundred cases of breast cancer treated in Cancer Institute and Hospital of Tianjin University from January to June of 2010 were included in this study. There were 112 cases of triple-negative breast cancer, 310 cases of ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) breast cancer, and 78 cases of ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(+) breast cancer. Their pathological and mammographic data were reviewed and analyzed. The pathological and mammographic features of the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) breast cancer group, the triple-negative group had a higher histological grade (P < 0.001). Compared with the ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) and ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(+) groups, the triple-negative group was more likely to have a tumor mass (simple mass accounted for 58.0%, and tumor mass with calcification accounted for 19.6%). Moreover, compared with the ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) group (47.1% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.032)and the ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(+) group (47.1% vs. 0, P = 0.028), the tumor mass of triple-negative cancer was more likely to have a smooth margin. Triple-negative breast cancer seldom represented as calcification (simple calcification only accounted for 13.4%, and a mass with calcification accounted for 19.6%), and most of them were benign calcification (70.3%), significantly higher than that in the ER(+)/PR(+)/HER-2(-) group (23.1%, P = 0.002) and ER(-)/PR(-)/HER-2(+) group (10.2%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Different types of breast cancer have different biological characteristics and mammographic features. Analysis of the mammographic features may help us to predict the type of breast cancer and its prognosis, and to select an optimal treatment plan for patients with different types of breast cancer.
