Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia.

Patients with dementia, schizophrenia and depression were tested with analogous auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) paradigms designed to elicit a large P3. The patient groups were compared to age normative predictions derived from a large control sample for a number of ERP and behavioral variables. The results were similar for the auditory and visual paradigms. P3 latency was prolonged two or more S.D.s beyond that predicted by age for less than one-half of the demented patients. This latency prolongation was significant for the group as a whole but would result in too many false negatives if used diagnostically for individuals. Furthermore, increased P3 latency was not specific, as the schizophrenic patients also had later P3s. The amplitude of P3 was reduced in the demented patients, but it was also smaller in other patient groups. The only variable which distinguished the demented patients from both controls and from the other patients was the single trial P3 latency/RT correlation. The demented patients, as a group, had significantly lower P3 latency/RT correlations, but this effect also was not sensitive enough to be diagnostic for individuals. The data from these two paradigms suggest that the P3 amplitude and latency abnormalities observed reflect a common, rather than a diagnostically specific deficit. This study is in contrast to some others which report much more sensitivity and specificity in the use of P3 latency in the diagnosis of dementia. Differences in task demands, patient samples and ERP analysis techniques might explain some of the discrepancy.

Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging.

Normal adult volunteer subjects ranging in age from 18 to 90 years participated in a study in which analogous auditory and visual paradigms, with infrequently occurring target and non-target events, were used to elicit event-related potentials (ERPs) with a prominent P3 component. Of the 135 subjects participating, 66 completed both auditory and visual paradigms. The amplitude and latency of P3 were analyzed using average ERPs, single trials (adaptive filter) and principal components analysis (PCA). Age regressions were calculated using measures derived from average ERPs and single trials. Single trial measures were better than average ERP measures in demonstrating age-related changes in P3 latency. There was a significant increase in P3 latency with age of 1-1.5 msec/year. The range of normal P3 latency for a given age (1 S.E. of the regression = 40 msec for the visual target stimuli) was much larger than obtained by other investigators. The visual paradigm produced higher P3 latency/age correlations than the auditory paradigm (visual target r = 0.52, non-target r = 0.42; auditory target r = 0.32, non-target r = 0.33). Within individuals, the amplitude and latency of P3 generated by auditory and visual stimuli were highly correlated, though the visual paradigm produced larger and later P3s than the auditory paradigm. There is an apparent change in the scalp topography of P3 with age. In young adults, P3s to target stimuli have a markedly parietal distribution. The distribution of P3 becomes more uniformly distributed from Pz to Fz with age. This may be due to changes in overlapping components such as the slow wave (SW) rather than to changes in the amplitude of P3 per se.

Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions.

Twelve young female subjects were presented with a series of horizontal line-pairs of same or different length in a two-alternative, forced-choice RT task, with 60 of each type pair in each block of trials. In one block (Easy) lines differed by 30%, in another block (Difficult) lines differed by 7%. Subjects were first given 60 practice trials with the Easy discrimination and with the instruction that speed and accuracy should be emphasized equally. For the next block of trials, accuracy was emphasized with a monetary bonus for accurate performance. Finally, in the last block of trials, speed was emphasized with a monetary bonus for speedy performance. Additionally, a penalty was incurred for RTs that exceeded a criterion level based on each individual subject's performance. The order of Easy and Difficult discrimination blocks was maintained within a subject but balanced across subjects. From the latency-adjusted P3s recorded from Pz, we obtained P3 latencies, amplitudes and single-trial P3 latency/RT correlations. RT to correct and incorrect trials and error data were also collected. P3 was considerably larger during the Speed than Accuracy conditions. The single-trial P3 latency/RT correlation was higher in Speed than in Accuracy runs. RT was 235 msec faster and P3 was 40 msec earlier during the Speed than during the Accuracy runs. On the other hand, discrimination difficulty delayed P3 and RT about equally, 28 and 43 msec respectively. This pattern suggests that speed instructions and discrimination difficulty affect stimulus processing time and response production time differently.

Sleeping patterns in upper-middle-class families when the child awakens ill or frightened.

Prior research on whether parents and children ever share a bed is scanty. Some experts have written that if parents take their frightened child into bed with them, there will be "devil to pay." Using a questionnaire, we surveyed 415 upper-middle-class parents of 576 children. We asked if, when their child awoke ill or frightened, they took the child into their bed. They commonly did. We question whether explanations that ascribe the cause of psychopathologic disorders to specific events may not be too simplistic. To date, too much attention may have been paid to the events, such as parents and children sharing a bed, are not enough has been devoted to the context, motivation, and setting in which these events occur.