Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102721, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510622

RESUMO

Background: The optimal operative approach for treating spinal infections remains a subject of debate. Corpectomy and Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) have emerged as common modalities, yet data on their feasibility and complication profiles are limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study examined 100 consecutive cases (2015-2022) that underwent VBR for spinal infection treatment. A comparison between Single-level-VBR and Multi-level-VBR was performed, evaluating patient profiles, revision rates, and outcomes. Results: Among 360 cases treated for spinal infections, 100 underwent VBR, located in all spinal regions. Average clinical and radiologic follow-up spanned 1.5 years. Single-level-VBR was performed in 60 cases, Two-level-VBR in 37, Three-level-VBR in 2, and Four-level-VBR in one case.Mean overall sagittal correction reached 10° (range 0-54°), varying by region. Revision surgery was required in 31 cases. Aseptic mechanical complications (8% pedicle screw loosening, 3% cage subsidence, 6% aseptic adjacent disc disease) were prominent reasons for revision. Longer posterior constructs (>4 levels) had significantly higher revision rates (p < 0.01). General complications (wound healing, hematoma) followed, along with infection relapse and adjacent disc infection (9%) and neurologic impairment (1%).Multilevel-VBR (≥2 levels) displayed no elevated cage subsidence rate compared to Single-level-VBR. Three deaths occurred (43-86 days post-op), all in the Multi-level-VBR group. Conclusion: This study, reporting the largest number of VBR cases for spinal infection treatment, affirmed VBR's effectiveness in sagittal imbalance correction. The overall survival was high, while reinfection rates matched other surgical studies. Anterior procedures have minimal implant related risks, but extended dorsal instrumentation elevates revision surgery likelihood.

2.
Hepatology ; 29(3): 632-9, 1999 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10051460

RESUMO

The aim of this prospective, nonrandomized study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on hepatic and systemic hemodynamics and on gastroesophageal collateral flow in patients with cirrhosis and failure of chronic sclerotherapy. Cardiac output (CO), free and wedged pulmonary artery pressure (FPAP and WPAP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), azygos venous blood flow (AzVBF), and the relative (portal minus vena cava) pressure in the portal vein (rel.PP) were determined immediately before, 30 minutes, 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after TIPS implantation in 21 patients with alcoholic and biliary cirrhosis with repeated bleeding from esophageal varices despite chronic sclerotherapy. TIPS was inserted when patients were in a stable hemodynamic condition. Palmaz stents were dilated to a 10-mm to 14-mm diameter until gastroesophageal collaterals were no longer visible on direct splenoportography. Relative portal pressure decreased from 21 +/- 5 mm Hg to 11 +/- 5 mm Hg 30 minutes after the procedure (P <.001). CO increased from 7.1 +/- 1.5 L/min at baseline to 8.9 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <.005) at 30 minutes, 8.2 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <. 01) at 1 week, and 8.0 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <.01) at 3 months after TIPS, and returned to 7.2 +/- 1.3 L/min (ns) after 1 year. Before TIPS, SVR was 990 +/- 285 dyne. sec. cm-5 and decreased to 856 +/- 252 dyne. sec. cm-5 (P <.05) and 866 +/- 267 dyne. sec. cm-5 (P <.05) at 30 minutes and 1 week after the procedure, and increased again to 903 +/- 208 dyne. sec. cm-5 (ns) and 1,016 +/- 260 dyne. sec. cm-5 (ns) at 3 months and 1 year, respectively. AzVBF continuously decreased from 474 +/- 138 mL/min before TIPS to 335 +/- 116 mL/min, 289 +/- 147 mL/min, 318 +/- 157 mL/min, and 250 +/- 104 mL/min (all P <.005) at 30 minutes, 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after TIPS. Portal decompression after TIPS is associated with a significant increase of CO for at least 3 months, which is only partly explained by a transient decrease of SVR. After 1 year, CO had returned to baseline levels. Despite an immediate decrease in portal pressure, the reduction of blood flow through gastroesophageal collaterals is delayed and not complete before 1 year after TIPS. In contrast to previous short-term observations, TIPS does not seem to cause long-term aggravation of the hyperkinetic circulation in patients with cirrhosis.


Assuntos
Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Circulação Hepática/fisiologia , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática , Adulto , Idoso , Circulação Colateral/fisiologia , Esôfago/irrigação sanguínea , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estômago/irrigação sanguínea , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...