ChatGPT's Gastrointestinal Tumor Board Tango: A limping dance partner?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the consistency and replicability of treatment recommendations provided by ChatGPT 3.5 compared to gastrointestinal tumor cases presented at multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). It also aimed to distinguish between general and case-specific responses and investigated the precision of ChatGPT's recommendations in replicating exact treatment plans, particularly regarding chemotherapy regimens and follow-up protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on 115 cases of gastrointestinal malignancies, selected from 448 patients reviewed in MTB meetings. A senior resident fed patient data into ChatGPT 3.5 to produce treatment recommendations, which were then evaluated against the tumor board's decisions by senior oncology fellows. RESULTS: Among the examined cases, ChatGPT 3.5 provided general information about the malignancy without considering individual patient characteristics in 19% of cases. However, only in 81% of cases, ChatGPT generated responses that were specific to the individual clinical scenarios. In the subset of case-specific responses, 83% of recommendations exhibited overall treatment strategy concordance between ChatGPT and MTB. However, the exact treatment concordance dropped to 65%, notably lower in recommending specific chemotherapy regimens. Cases recommended for surgery showed the highest concordance rates, while those involving chemotherapy recommendations faced challenges in precision. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT 3.5 demonstrates potential in aligning conceptual approaches to treatment strategies with MTB guidelines. However, it falls short in accurately duplicating specific treatment plans, especially concerning chemotherapy regimens and follow-up procedures. Ethical concerns and challenges in achieving exact replication necessitate prudence when considering ChatGPT 3.5 for direct clinical decision-making in MTBs.

Quantitative Characterization of Ectopic Adrenal Gene Expression in Fetal Testes in 21-Hydroxylase Deficient Mice.

Testicular adrenal rest tumors (TART) are a frequent and fertility impairing long-term complication in males with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Due to lack of clear experimental data on their origin, they are hypothesized to be derived from ectopic adrenocortical cells within testicular tissue mainly growing upon stimulation by chronically elevated levels of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). Alternatively, a more totipotent embryological origin has been discussed as the potential source of these tumors. The aim of this study was to quantify alterations of ectopic expression of adrenocortical genes (CYP11B1, CYP11B2, CYP21, MC2R) and the Leydig cell specific marker (INSL3) in testicular tissue of fetal 21-hydroxylase deficient (21OHD) mice. Timed-pregnancy studies were performed using H-2aw18 (aw18)-mice. Testes and adrenals of E15.5 and E18.5 mouse fetuses were used for real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Gene expression levels were analyzed for genotype-dependent alterations and compared with immunohistochemistry. While enzymes of steroidogenesis showed a significant increased expression in adrenals of 21OHD mice at both E15.5 and E18.5 compared to wild-type (WT) mice, expression levels were unaltered in testes of 21OHD mice. When compared to WT adrenals a significant increase of INSL3 expression in adrenals of 21OHD mice at E15.5 and E18.5 was detected. Cells with adrenocortical properties in mice fetal testis differ from in situ adrenocortical cells in gene expression and growth at E15.5 and E18.5. These findings suggest that the different local regulation and different local niche in adrenals and testes influence growth of aberrant adrenal cells.

[Cystic pancreatic lesions-indications, timing and reasons for surveillance]. / Pankreaszysten ­ Indikationen, Zeitpunkt und Rationale für eine Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Cystic pancreatic lesions are detected incidentally at an increasing rate. Often, the patients present asymptomatically. Hence, the resulting clinical consequences remain challenging and unsettling for both physicians and patients. OBJECTIVES: Status of current recommendations in handling cystic pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selective literature search of PubMed while taking current guidelines into account. RESULTS: Correct diagnostic classification of the cystic lesion is crucial since further action depends on the type of cystic lesion. Resection is generally recommended for mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN), and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) with relevant risk criteria such as prominent main-duct dilation. Surveillance is recommended for IPMN without risk criteria, as long as comorbidities and life expectancy of the patient will allow preventive resection over the years. SCNs are benign and only symptomatic SCNs require resection. Inflammatory pancreatic cysts should only be treated under certain circumstances.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes following pancreatic injury - An international multicenter cohort study.

Background: Trauma to the pancreas is rare but associated with significant morbidity. Currently available management guidelines are based on low-quality evidence and data on long-term outcomes is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and patient-reported long-term outcomes for pancreatic injury. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluating treatment for pancreatic injury in 11 centers across 5 European nations over >10 years was performed. Data relating to pancreatic injury and treatment were collected from hospital records. Patients reported quality of life (QoL), changes to employment and new or ongoing therapy due to index injury. Results: In all, 165 patients were included. The majority were male (70.9%), median age was 27 years (range: 6-93) and mechanism of injury predominantly blunt (87.9%). A quarter of cases were treated conservatively; higher injury severity score (ISS) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) pancreatic injury scores increased the likelihood for surgical, endoscopic and/or radiologic intervention. Isolated, blunt pancreatic injury was associated with younger age and pancreatic duct involvement; this cohort appeared to benefit from non-operative management. In the long term (median follow-up 93; range 8-214 months), exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency were reported by 9.3% of respondents. Long-term analgesic use also affected 9.3% of respondents, with many reported quality of life problems (QoL) potentially attributable to side-effects of opiate therapy. Overall, impaired QoL correlated with higher ISS scores, surgical therapy and opioid analgesia on discharge. Conclusions: Pancreatic trauma is rare but can lead to substantial short- and long-term morbidity. Near complete recovery of QoL indicators and pancreatic function can occur despite significant injury, especially in isolated, blunt pancreatic injury managed conservatively and when early weaning off opiate analgesia is achieved.

SPOCK2 gene expression is downregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and correlates with prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a widespread form of malignant pancreatic neoplasms and a leading oncologic cause of death in Europe and the USA. Despite advances in understanding its molecular biology, the 5-year survival rate remains low at 10%. The extracellular matrix in PDAC contains proteins, including SPOCK2, which are essential for tumorigenicity and drug resistance. The present study aims to explore the possible role of SPOCK2 in the pathogenesis of PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expression of SPOCK2 was evaluated in 7 PDAC cell lines and 1 normal pancreatic cell line using quantitative RT-PCR. Demethylation of the gene was carried out using 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) treatment with subsequent validation Western Blot analysis. In vitro downregulation of SPOCK2 gene was performed using siRNA transfection. MTT and transwell assays were employed to evaluate the impact of the SPOK2 demethylation on the proliferation and migration of PDAC cells. KM Plotter was applied to analyze a correlation between SPOCK2 mRNA expression and the survival of PDAC patients. RESULTS: In contrast to the normal pancreatic cell line, SPOCK2 expression was significantly downregulated in PDAC cell lines. Treatment with 5-aza-dC, led to increase in SPOCK2 expression in the cell lines tested. Importantly, compared with control cells, transfected with SPOCK2 siRNA cells exhibited increased growth rates and more migration ability. Finally, we demonstrated that a high SPOCK2 expression level correlated with longer overall survival of patients with PDAC. CONCLUSION: The expression of SPOCK2 is downregulated in PDAC as a result of hypermethylation of its corresponding gene. SPOCK2 expression as well as the demethylation of its gene could be a potential marker for PDAC.

[Expected effects of the new continuing education regulations in general and visceral surgery : Survey among Bavarian surgeons and residents]. / Erwartete Effekte der neuen Weiterbildungsordnung in der Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie : Eine Umfrage unter bayerischen Chirurg*innen und Weiterbildungsassistent*innen.

INTRODUCTION: The new competency-based continuing education regulations for surgical training (WBO) came into effect in Bavaria in August 2022. METHODS: From May to July 2022, we conducted an anonymized online survey among Bavarian general and visceral surgeons and surgical residents (ÄiW). The aim was to survey expectations of the effects of the new WBO. RESULTS: The response rate was 35%. In total data could be collected from 80 persons, 36 ÄiW (45%), 30 specialists and senior physicians (37.5%) and 14 chief physicians (17.5%). The majority of respondents worked at a university hospital (38.8%) or a regular provider (35%). A strengthening of the competence to act through implementation of the new WBO is seen by 41.3% and 55.7% see independent operating under partial supervision by the instructor as a goal. Of the respondents 50% see the required case numbers as not achievable and 55.1% deny reaching them in the expected period of 6 years. About 60% do not expect to be able to train the same number of ÄiWs in the same amount of time. Almost 75% of the respondents state that from their point of view, a good continuing education with the achievement of a solid competence to act would not work without overtime hours. About 44% of the respondents expect that a full surgical training would continue to be possible at their institution. CONCLUSION: Both among the instructors and among the trainees there is a tendency to fear that realistic training, in particular the achievement of the guideline figures, will no longer be possible in the usual further training time. This necessitates the consistent implementation of structured continuing education with a high degree of transparency in training.

Outcomes and risks in palliative pancreatic surgery: an analysis of the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

BACKGROUND: Non-resectability is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to local invasion or distant metastases. Then, biliary or gastroenteric bypasses or both are often established despite associated morbidity and mortality. The current study explores outcomes after palliative bypass surgery in patients with non-resectable PDAC. METHODS: From the prospectively maintained German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry, all patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC who underwent non-resective pancreatic surgery between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively identified, and the influence of the surgical procedure on morbidity and mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 389 included patients, 127 (32.6%) underwent explorative surgery only, and a biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass was established in 92 (23.7%), 65 (16.7%) and 105 (27.0%). After exploration only, patients had a significantly shorter stay in the intensive care unit (mean 0.5 days [SD 1.7] vs. 1.9 [3.6], 2.0 [2.8] or 2.1 [2.8]; P < 0.0001) and in the hospital (median 7 days [IQR 4-11] vs. 12 [10-18], 12 [8-19] or 12 [9-17]; P < 0.0001), and complications occurred less frequently (22/127 [17.3%] vs. 37/92 [40.2%], 29/65 [44.6%] or 48/105 [45.7%]; P < 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression, biliary stents were associated with less major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) complications (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.25-0.96], P = 0.037), whereas-compared to exploration only-biliary, gastroenteric, and double bypass were associated with more major complications (OR 3.58 [1.48-8.64], P = 0.005; 3.50 [1.39-8.81], P = 0.008; 4.96 [2.15-11.43], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-resectable PDAC, biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass surgery is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Although surgical palliation is indicated if interventional alternatives are inapplicable, or life expectancy is high, less invasive options should be considered.

Perception of journal club seminars by medical doctoral students: results from five years of evaluation.

Objectives: A journal club is one of the well-established and popular methods of post-graduate education. In this work, we were interested to understand how the participants perceive journal club as a whole and how they evaluate their personal process of acquiring new scientific knowledge and development of soft-skills as an indispensable prerequisite of the lifelong learning. Project description: This study is a survey analysis examining perception of journal club sessions by post-graduate medical students. A checklist for journal club preparation as well as a questionnaire for evaluation of the journal club session by participants has been developed to determine if the journal club had met its aims. Data were collected by summing up all answers to each question of the questionnaire for each session. Qualitative data from a five-year evaluation period were compiled and analyzed. Results: The journal club checklist served as a guideline for the preparation of a journal club session as well as an evaluation questionnaire containing 24 items. Our work presents evidence that journal club seminars are well perceived by participants. Furthermore, a high percentage of participants deemed the working atmosphere to be constructive and found it worthwhile to participate in the sessions. The topics of the presentations have been positively evaluated, however only a minority of participants found that the topics of the journal club was related to their own specific research topic. Concerning the distribution of the journal article, we could show that distributing the paper one week before the journal club event provided sufficient time for preparation. Our evaluation revealed that two-thirds of the participants found discussions during journal club sessions rich and productive. The motivation to think more critically increased during journal club sessions. From our work, it is evident that the participants perceived the speakers´ soft-skills to have improved with the practice. Finally, we show a clear trend of improved perception of the value of journal club sessions from beginning to the end of the evaluation time. Conclusion: Based on the analyzed evaluations, we can conclude that journal club events are highly valued by participants and could be a good option for the development of certain soft-skills.

Specific intraoperative antibiotic therapy abrogates the negative effect of biliary contamination on the Comprehensive Complication Index after pancreatic head resection.

BACKGROUND: The effect of bacterobilia on morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of positive intraoperative bile cultures and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on morbidity measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index, a weighted composite of postoperative complications. METHODS: Intraoperative bile cultures of 182 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were obtained. We examined the effect of intraoperative bile cultures and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the Comprehensive Complication Index and the occurrence of postoperative complications. To this aim, we performed general linear models controlling for relevant demographic and perioperative factors. RESULTS: Positive (versus negative) intraoperative bile cultures were associated with a higher mean Comprehensive Complication Index (25.34 vs 16.81, P = .025). The mean Comprehensive Complication Index differed significantly between individuals with positive intraoperative bile cultures and bacterial strains not covered by perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (26.2) versus positive intraoperative bile cultures and bacterial strains sensitive to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (22.7) (P = .045). Positive (versus negative) intraoperative bile cultures were associated with 4.75 times (95% confidence interval: 1.74-13.00, P = .002) greater odds of wound infections. The odds of wound infection were 1.93 times (95% confidence interval: .47-8.04) greater in those with positive intraoperative bile cultures and adequate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 6.14 times (95% confidence interval: 2.17-17.35) greater in those with positive intraoperative bile cultures and inadequate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (versus negative intraoperative bile cultures) (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Bacterobilia is associated with a significant increase in Comprehensive Complication Index and wound infections after pancreatoduodenectomy, which may be reduced by administration of a specific perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Acquisition of bile cultures sampled through the external conduit of patients with preoperative biliary drainage could help in selecting a specific perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and patients with bile duct stents might benefit from broad spectrum perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

A Combination of Biochemical and Pathological Parameters Improves Prediction of Postresection Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: The PANAMA-score.

OBJECTIVE: To build a prognostic score for patients with primary chemotherapy undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer based on pathological parameters and preoperative Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. BACKGROUND: Prognostic stratification after primary chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is challenging and prediction models, such as the AJCC staging system, lack validation in the setting of preoperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with primary chemotherapy resected at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. Tumor characteristics independently associated with overall survival were identified and weighted by Cox-proportional regression. The pancreatic neoadjuvant Massachusetts-score (PANAMA-score) was computed from these variables and its performance assessed by Harrel concordance index and area under the receiving characteristics curves analysis. Comparisons were made with the AJCC staging system and external validation was performed in an independent cohort with primary chemotherapy from Heidelberg, Germany. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients constituted the training cohort. The multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size, number of positive lymph-nodes, R-status, and high CA19-9 to be independently associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis according to low, intermediate, and high PANAMA-score showed good discriminatory power of the new metrics (P < 0.001). The median overall survival for the three risk-groups was 45, 27, and 12 months, respectively. External validation in 258 patients confirmed the prognostic ability of the score and demonstrated better accuracy compared with the AJCC staging system. CONCLUSION: The proposed PANAMA-score, based on independent predictors of postresection survival, including pathologic variables and CA19-9, not only provides better discrimination compared to the AJCC staging system, but also identifies patients at high-risk for early death.

Patient expectations shape convalescence after major liver surgery - A prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest an important influence of patient expectations on outcomes. We hypothesized that patient expectations with regard to length of postoperative stay influence convalescence after liver resections. METHOD: This prospective, randomized study compared patients who were preoperatively either informed to be expected to stay 7-10 days (short arm) or 12-16 days (long arm) after major liver resections (≥4 segments). Additionally, psychological traits were assessed using questionnaires and the time to fulfillment of objective discharge criteria [oral analgesics only, first bowel movement, ability to tolerate solid food, full mobilization, no complications which need general anesthesia (>CD IIIa)] was defined as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Patients in the short arm reached the objective discharge criteria after 8.39 days (SD 3.60), while patients in the long arm needed 12.73 days (SD 3.43) (p = 0.001). The actual length of stay in the short arm was 12.00 (IQR 8-16) and 19.3 days in the long arm (IQR 14-26) (p = 0.008). A more pronounced self-efficacy correlated with earlier fulfillment of the objective discharge criteria (p = 0.048), whereas patients placing a high value on their health needed more time (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The expectation of a shorter length of stay results in a quicker objective, physical patient convalescence after major liver resections.

Structured Reporting Using CEUS LI-RADS for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)-Impact and Advantages on Report Integrity, Quality and Interdisciplinary Communication.

BACKGROUND: Our retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the impact of structured reporting (SR) using a CEUS LI-RADS template on report quality compared to conventional free-text reporting (FTR) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We included 50 patients who underwent CEUS for HCC staging. FTR created after these examinations were compared to SR retrospectively generated by using template-based online software with clickable decision trees. The reports were evaluated regarding report completeness, information extraction, linguistic quality and overall report quality by two readers specialized in internal medicine and visceral surgery. RESULTS: SR significantly increased report completeness with at least one key feature missing in 31% of FTR vs. 2% of SR (p < 0.001). Information extraction was considered easy in 98% of SR vs. 86% of FTR (p = 0.004). The trust of referring physicians in the report was significantly increased by SR with a mean of 5.68 for SR vs. 4.96 for FTR (p < 0.001). SR received significantly higher ratings regarding linguistic quality (5.79 for SR vs. 4.83 for FTR (p < 0.001)) and overall report quality (5.75 for SR vs. 5.01 for FTR (p < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: Using SR instead of conventional FTR increases the overall quality of reports in CEUS examinations of HCC patients and may represent a valuable tool to facilitate clinical decision-making and improve interdisciplinary communication in the future.

Preoperative cholangitis is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative biliary stenting is required for patients with obstructive jaundice from pancreatic adenocarcinoma who are receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While in most patients this approach results in durable biliary drainage, some patients develop cholangitis during neoadjuvant treatment. Further, several studies have shown that preoperative cholangitis in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies can result in substantially unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative cholangitis in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Participants: all adult patients (n = 449) diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from January 1st, 2013 to March 31st, 2018 who pursued treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital were screened. Of these 449 patients, 97 met final inclusion criteria of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent to pursue curative surgery. Data were collected via retrospective chart review including baseline characteristics, survival, episodes of preoperative cholangitis, and surgical complications. RESULTS: In patients completing successful pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery, preoperative cholangitis is associated with increased mortality (HR 2.67, 95% CI:1.16-6.13). This finding is independent of postoperative outcomes or tumor recurrence rate. The presence of cholangitis did not impact completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (92% vs 85%, p = 0.5) or ability to proceed to surgery (76% vs 75%, p = 1.0). Preoperative cholangitis was not associated with postoperative morbidity (42.1% vs 45.1%, p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: One episode of cholangitis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased mortality following successful pancreaticoduodenectomy, independent of immediate postoperative outcomes or tumor recurrence. Preoperative cholangitis does not affect ability to pursue neoadjuvant chemotherapy or complete successful surgery. Patients who develop cholangitis during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment phase may reflect a distinct phenotype of patients with PDAC with a complex and more challenging clinical course.

Pancreatic panniculitis and elevated serum lipase in metastasized acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic panniculitis is an extremely rare condition associated with different underlying pancreatic disorders and characterized by subcutaneous fat necrosis induced by elevated serum lipase levels. These lesions usually affect the lower extremities and may precede abdominal symptoms of pancreatic disease. Acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the pancreas is a rare pancreatic neoplasm, accounting for only 1%-2% of pancreatic tumors in adults. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 72-year-old man with ACC of the pancreatic head and synchronous liver metastases. Both the primary tumor and liver metastases were resected. Serum lipase was elevated before surgery and decreased to normal postoperatively. Rising serum lipase levels at follow-up led to the diagnosis of hepatic recurrence. This disease progression was then accompanied by pancreatic panniculitis, with subcutaneous fat necrosis and acute arthritis. To the best of our knowledge, only 4 cases have been reported in the literature and each showed a similar association of serum lipase levels with pancreatic panniculitis and progression of ACC. CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms and progression of ACC may correlate with serum lipase levels, suggesting potential usefulness as a follow-up biomarker.

The quality of pain management in pancreatic cancer: A prospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently associated with severe pain. Given the almost inevitably fatal nature of the disease, pain control is crucial. However, data on quality of pain management in PDAC is scarce. METHODS: This is a multi-center, prospective study to evaluate the quality of pain management in PDAC. Insufficient pain treatment (undertreatment) was prevalent if there was an incongruence between the patients level of pain and the potency of analgesic drug therapy. Determinants of pain and undertreatment were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 139 patients with histologically confirmed PDAC were analyzed. The prevalence of pain was 63%, with approximately one third of the patients grading their pain as moderate to severe. Palliative stage (OR: 3.37, 95%CI: 1.23-9.21, p = 0.018) and localization of the primary tumor in the body or tail (OR: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.05-6.31, p = 0.039) were independent determinants of pain. Of those reporting pain, 60% were undertreated and in 89% pain interfered with activities and emotions. Age ≥ 70 years (OR: 3.20, 95%CI: 1.09-9.41, p = 0.035) was an independent predictor of undertreatment. Patients with longer-known PDAC ( ≥ 30 days) showed improved pain management compared to new cases (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.05-0.81, p = 0.025). Treatment by gastroenterologists (OR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.05-0.89, p = 0.034) was associated with less undertreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results show a high proportion of PDAC patients with pain, pain interference and undertreatment, whose characteristics could help to identify patients at risk in the future. Several changes in the management of cancer-related pain are necessary to overcome barriers to optimal treatment.

Neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients receiving FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and lead to a similar oncological outcome compared to non-aged patients - Results of the RESPECT-Study.

INTRODUCTION: The number of people aged 60 and above will rise from 46 million in 2015 to 157 in 2050 million, exceeding 30% of the population in many western countries. Consequently, the demand for oncological therapy for elderly patients will increase within the next decades. Currently, sufficient data on neoadjuvant therapy (NTx) of pancreatic cancer in elderly patients are lacking. METHODS: Data of a multinational, retrospective database were screened for patients having received preoperative FOLFIRINOX (FFx) or Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC/BRPC) before June 2017. Data were included in an intention-to-treat-analysis and outcomes were compared between non-aged and elderly patients using a cut-off age of 63 (comparison 1) and 70 years (comparison 2). RESULTS: Of 165 patients receiving NTx, 76 and 33 were older than 63 and 70 years. Baseline characteristics revealed that elderly patients preferably undergo GNP (comparison 1: p = 0.063; comparison2: p = 0.005), with less cycles of NTx (comparison 1: p = 0.057). Whereas reductions of NTx dosage was more common in elderly patients in comparison 1 (p = 0.003), resection rates (p = 0.575; p = 1.000) and median survival (p = 0.406; p = 0.499) were not different. Whereas resected patients showed no differences in survival (p = 0.328; p = 0.132), patients aged >70 years showed a decreased progression-free survival (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients treated with NTx show encouragingly high resection rates. If comorbidities allow for FFx or GNP, elderly patients with LAPC/BRPC can offered NTx with the prospect of survival comparable to younger patients.

Respect - A multicenter retrospective study on preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a powerful tool to convert borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancers (LAPC) into a resectable scenario. However, data analyzing the optimal type of therapy are scarce. In the present multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the influence of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine (GEM)-based neoadjuvant therapy on patient prognosis. METHODS: Data on 239 patients from 7 centers across Europe was gathered using an online database. Patients having received their first cycle of chemotherapy for BRPC/LAPC before 06/2017, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Patients treated with neoadjuvant FFX (n = 135) or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GNP) (n = 38) had significantly improved radiological response according to RECIST criteria as compared to single-agent GEM (n = 16), with a partial/complete response of 59.3%, 55.3% and 6.25% respectively (p = 0.001). Treatment with FFX (n = 135) and GNP (n = 38) resulted in higher resection rates compared to GEM (73.3%, 81.6% and 43.8%; p = 0.01 and p = 0.005). Regardless of regimen, patients who were resected had significantly prolonged overall survival compared to non-resected patients (p < 0.01). Complete pathological responses (ypT0 ypN0) were predominantly observed with FFX (p = 0.01). Adjuvant GNP in addition to successful neoadjuvant therapy and surgery resulted in a trend towards improved median survival as compared to postoperative observation (47.0 vs. 30.1 months, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Representing one of the largest studies published so far, our results reveal that patients with BRPC/LAPC should be offered either FFX or GNP to improve chances of resection and with this also survival.

Improvement of survival after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer independent of adjuvant chemotherapy in the past two decades - A meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection improves survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy adds an additional survival-benefit. While surgical technique has improved in recent years, it remains unclear whether these improvements translate into a survival benefit independent of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, we aimed to clarify whether survival of patients who were treated with either Gemcitabine (GEM) or who were observed only in randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy of PDAC improved over time. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed was performed to identify randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy of PDAC. The search was limited to studies with arms on GEM monotherapy or postoperative observation and studies were grouped by the median year of enrolment and the use of GEM. Subsequently, a meta-regression on the effect of the median year of enrolment on patient survival was performed. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies with 2469 patients was included, with median years of enrollment ranging from 1996 to 2015. While disease-free survival decreased in patients with postoperative observation (18.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.001), median survival improved over time in patients with postoperative observation (15.8 vs. 18.4 months, p = 0.01) and in patients treated with adjuvant GEM (22.8 vs. 35.0 months, p < 0.001). One- (p ≤ 0.01) and two-year survival (p = 0.056) improved in both patients treated with adjuvant GEM and those observed only. CONCLUSION: Survival after surgical resection of PDAC has improved since 1996, even in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Improved surgical technique and postoperative management are likely to be causative factors.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with unfavorable pathologic features, increased postoperative mortality, and worse long-term survival in resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increased in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), particularly in those with new-onset DM. However, the impact of DM on outcomes following pancreatic surgery is not fully understood. We sought to explore the effects of DM on post-resection outcomes in patients undergoing either upfront resection or following neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). METHODS: Resections for PDAC between 2007 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively-maintained database. Data on demographics, pathology, and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with or without DM. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted for confounders by a Cox-proportional hazards model. RESULTS: 662 patients were identified, of whom 277 (41.8%) had DM. Diabetics were more likely to be male, had higher BMI, and higher ASA-scores. At pathology, DM was associated with larger tumors (30 vs. 26 mm; p = 0.041), higher rates of lymph-node involvement (69% vs. 59%; p = 0.031) and perineural invasion (88% vs. 82%; p = 0.026). Despite having similar rates of complications, diabetics experienced higher 30-day mortality (3.2% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.019). Median overall survival was worse in diabetic patients (18 vs. 34 months; p < 0.001); this effect was more pronounced in patients with NAT (18 vs. 54 months; p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, DM was confirmed as an independent predictor of post-resection survival. CONCLUSION: DM is a common comorbidity in PDAC and is associated with unfavorable pathology, as well as worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes. The blunted effect on survival is more pronounced in patients who undergo resection following NAT.