Right ventricular end-systolic area as a simple first-line marker predicting right ventricular enlargement and decreased systolic function in children referred for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

AIM: To assess the accuracy of simple cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) parameters for first-line analysis of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in children to identify those who require in-depth analysis and those in whom simple assessment is sufficient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty paediatric CMR studies were analysed. The following CMR parameters were measured: RV end-diastolic and end-systolic area (4CH EDA and 4CH ESA), fractional area change (FAC), RV diameter in end-diastole (RVD1), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and RV outflow tract diameter in end-diastole (RVOT prox). They were correlated with RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDVI) and RV ejection fraction (RVEF). RESULTS: RVEDVI correlated best with 4CH ESA (r=0.85, <0.001) and EDA (r=0.82, <0.001). For RVEF only a moderate reverse correlation was found for 4CH ESA (-0.56, <0.001), 4CH EDA (-0.49, 0.001) and positive correlation for FAC (0.49, <0.001). There was no correlation between TAPSE and RVEF and only weak between RVD1 and RVEDVI. A 4CH ESA cut-off value of 8.5 cm2/m2 had a very high diagnostic accuracy for predicting an enlarged RV (AUC=0.912, p<0.001, sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 79%) and a cut-off value of 10.5 cm2/m2 was also a good predictor of depressed RV systolic function (AUC=0.873, p<0.001, sensitivity 83%, specificity 89%). CONCLUSION: For routine screening in clinical practice, 4CH ESA seems a reliable and easy method to identify patients with RV dysfunction.

Systolic myocardial volume gain in dilated, hypertrophied and normal heart. CMR study.

AIM: To investigate changes in myocardial tissue volume during the cardiac cycle to verify the hypothesis of non-compressibility of the myocardium in healthy individuals (HI) as well as in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and aortic stenosis (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group included 30 HI, and patients with HCM (n=110), DCM (n=89), and AS (n=78). Left ventricular (LV) function, end-diastolic, and end-systolic volumes were calculated based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for all participants. RESULTS: End-systolic myocardial volumes were higher than end-diastolic in both controls (91.2±26.6 versus 85.1±24.3 ml, p<0.001) and in all patient groups: HCM (214.3±81.6 versus 176±64.2 ml, p<0.01), DCM (128.4±43.1 versus 115.4±42.9 ml, p<0.001) and AS (155.1±37.1 versus 129.4±34.6 ml, p<0.001). HCM and AS patients had significantly higher systolic volume gain than HI (21.5±8.3 versus 10.6±6.3%, p<0.01 and 18.3±5.7 versus 10.6±6.3% p=0.013, respectively). Conversely, DCM patients had lesser increases in myocardial systolic volume than HCM patients (11.2±4.8% versus 21.5±8.3, p=0.01) and AS patients (11.2±4.8% versus 18.3±5.7, p=0.02). No differences were found in systolic volume gain between AS and HCM patients (p=ns) or between DCM patients and HI (p=ns). CONCLUSION: End-systolic myocardial volume was significantly higher than end-diastolic volume in all subsets of patients. The systolic volume gain was greater in individuals with hypertrophy than in those without.