Does mandating offenders to treatment improve completion rates?

While it is known that community-based outpatient treatment for substance abusing offenders is effective, treatment completion rates are low and much of the prior research has been conducted with offenders in residential treatment or therapeutic communities. The aim of the present study was to assess whether offenders who are mandated to community-based outpatient treatment have better completion rates compared to those who enter treatment voluntarily. The 160 research participants were a heterogeneous group of substance abusers who were under various levels of criminal justice supervision (CJS) in the community. The participants were enrolled in an intensive outpatient program and were recruited into the study between July 2007 and October 2010. All offenders received weekly therapy sessions using a cognitive problem solving framework and 45% completed the 6 month treatment program. Interestingly, those who were mandated demonstrated less motivation at treatment entry, yet were more likely to complete treatment compared to those who were not court-ordered to treatment. While controlling for covariates known to be related to treatment completion, the logistic regression analyses demonstrated that court-ordered offenders were over 10 times more likely to complete treatment compared to those who entered treatment voluntarily (OR=10.9, CI=2.0-59.1, p=.006). These findings demonstrate that stipulated treatment for offenders may be an effective way to increase treatment compliance.

Characteristics and 9-month outcomes of discharged methadone maintenance clients.

This study is a secondary data analysis of a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of outreach case management (OCM) in linking discharged methadone patients back into treatment. The original trial assessed the effectiveness of the OCM intervention compared to a passive referral among methadone clients who needed treatment postdischarge but had not reengaged. The purpose of this study was to assess the characteristics and long-term outcomes of all clients who were discharged from methadone maintenance treatment including those who had reengaged in treatment. A total of 230 methadone clients were interviewed 3 months and then again at 9 months following discharge from treatment. Compared with participants who needed treatment but had not reengaged (NoTx: 56%), those who had successfully reenrolled in treatment (Tx; 44%) were more likely to be female, not married, and unemployed; had a longer history of sedative use; reported more psychiatric hospitalizations; and were originally enrolled in a community-based rather than a Veterans Administration program. Despite having more severe problems, the Tx group had fewer opioid-positive urines and reported less IV drug use at 9 months postdischarge compared to the NoTx group. The findings highlight the importance of rapid treatment reengagement.

An integrated drug counseling and employment intervention for methadone clients.

After drug use stabilization, employment has long been considered an important goal for clients enrolled in Methadone Maintenance Treatment Programs (MMTPs). The integrated counseling and employment intervention described here is a manualized treatment based on interpersonal cognitive problem solving (ICPS) theory. The six-month intervention utilized a problem-solving framework to help methadone clients obtain a job and manage employment within the context of drug treatment. In this pilot study, 23 subjects were randomly assigned to either integrated ICPS drug and employment counseling (n = 12) or to an ICPS drug counseling control condition (n = 11). While there were no differences between the integrated and control conditions, both groups showed a significant improvement in employment outcomes and reduction in HIV risk behaviors at the six-month follow-up. Although there may be concerns regarding the generalizability of the findings, overall, the problem solving framework may be an improvement over standard methadone counseling. The intervention may be beneficial when implemented with a larger group of motivated ex-offenders who are mandated to drug treatment as a condition of their parole.

The effectiveness of outreach case management in re-enrolling discharged methadone patients.

BACKGROUND: Heroin dependence is a chronic relapsing disease often requiring multiple treatment experiences. Despite this knowledge, few methadone programs follow-up with discharged patients who frequently continue to engage in risky behaviors. The aim of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of outreach case management for post-discharged methadone patients. METHODS: At 90 days post-discharge 128 active out of treatment heroin users were randomly assigned to receive either a passive referral (PR) for drug treatment (n=52) or were provided with 6 weeks of outreach case management (OCM), an intervention designed to help motivate and coach patients to re-enter treatment (n=76). RESULTS: At 6 months post-baseline 29% of the OCM participants had successfully re-enrolled in drug treatment compared to 8% of the PR participants (chi(2)=7.6, d.f.=1, p=0.006). A logistic regression analysis showed that OCM participants were nearly six times more likely than PR participants to re-engage in MMT (OR=5.8, CI=1.6-20.8, p=0.008). Moreover, OCM subjects had fewer opiate and cocaine positive urines at the 6-month follow-up compared to PR subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of engaging former patients in treatment and actively assisting in treatment re-entry. OCM is a simple approach to reduce the number of out-of-treatment drug users, although availability of treatment funding limits enrollment opportunities.