Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting: A narrative review.

Quality of recovery (QoR) is an important concept in the perioperative care of a patient. Assessment of QoR has prognostic and economic importance, with clinical and research applications and improves patient satisfaction in the perioperative period. It, therefore, behooves the perioperative clinician to have a good understanding of the concept of QoR to better manage the perioperative patient. This literature review will discuss the concept of QoR, the development thereof, and explore the different assessments of QoR. Special attention is paid to the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) and the Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) assessment tools, with further attention to development, composition, validation, and subsequent usage of the QoR-15. Furthermore, factors that have been found to influence QoR and the importance of measuring QoR will be discussed.

Quality of Recovery Following Orthopedic Surgery in Patients at an Academic Hospital in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of perioperative quality of recovery (QoR) is an important tool in improving the patient's perioperative experience. By making use of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, this study aimed to measure the QoR on day 1 in patients following elective and semiurgent orthopedic surgery at an academic hospital. A secondary aim was to determine factors that may influence the QoR. METHODS: A cross-sectional research study was performed in 122 patients presenting for elective and semiurgent orthopedic surgery during core working hours between July and November 2019 at Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients completed a baseline QoR-15 assessment preoperatively and a day 1 QoR-15 assessment between 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Additional information on various anesthetic, surgical, and patient factors was collected. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (15.6%) had a poor QoR on day 1 and were found to have started with a significantly worse baseline QoR-15 score than those with no poor QoR (98.5 vs 128.5; P < .001). A significant worsening from the overall mean baseline QoR-15 to the overall mean day 1 QoR-15 score was found (123.8 vs 113.1; P = .001). This worsening score was more pronounced in patients with a poor day 1 QoR-15 score than no poor day 1 score (25.3 vs 8; P = .002). Surgical site was found to have a significant effect on day 1 score (P = .026). A significantly worse severe pain score was found in patients with foot/ankle and knee surgery compared to hand/arm surgery (P = .012 and P = .032, respectively) and is thought to be due to the decreased use of peripheral nerve blocks in lower limb surgery. Sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, type of anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and antiemetic given (only applicable in general anesthetic cases) were not found to have a significant effect on the day 1 QoR-15 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had a poor QoR on day 1 started with a significantly worse baseline QoR-15 score and experienced a significantly greater negative change in the mean difference. Preoperative identification of patients who are at risk of a poor postoperative QoR may aid in preemptive targeting of limited resources to those who need them most. Postoperative pain, particularly in patients after foot/ankle and knee surgery, is a significant modifiable factor to improve postoperative QoR at our institution.

Chlorhexidine gluconate: to bathe or not to bathe?

Despite infection-prevention initiatives, hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are still a common occurrence. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is an important antibacterial agent. Research indicates that the intervention of bathing with CHG can reduce the number of HAIs. Chlorhexidine gluconate is known to reduce the bioload of several bacteria, including multiple strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Research regarding the intervention of bathing with CHG was assessed and found to reduce central line-related blood stream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The reduction in HAIs was found to be greater as compared to bathing with soap and water. The reduction of these HAIs will allow for a saving of resources, finances and staff time, which may ultimately be passed on to the patient. While further research is indicated, a strong conclusion is drawn that bathing with CHG reduces the number of HAIs.