Gut-directed hypnotherapy versus standard medical treatment for nausea in children with functional nausea or functional dyspepsia: protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of chronic functional nausea or nausea due to functional dyspepsia in children is generally symptomatic. Moreover, these disorders pose a risk for worse psychosocial and health outcomes in children. Hypnotherapy (HT), by its ability to positively influence gastrointestinal and psychosocial functioning, may be an effective treatment for chronic nausea. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To test efficacy, this multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled, open label trial evaluates whether gut-directed HT is superior to standard medical treatment (SMT) for reducing nausea. The study will be conducted at eleven academic and non-academic hospitals across the Netherlands. A total of 100 children (8-18 years), fulfilling the Rome IV criteria for chronic idiopathic nausea or functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea, will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HT or SMT. Children allocated to the HT group will receive six sessions of HT during 3 months, while children allocated to the SMT group will receive six sessions of SMT+supportive therapy during the same period. The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of children with at least 50% reduction of nausea, compared with baseline at 12 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the changes in abdominal pain, dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, depression, school absences, parental absence of work, healthcare costs and adequate relief of symptoms, measured directly after treatment, 6 and 12 months' follow-up. If HT proves effective for reducing nausea, it may become a new treatment strategy to treat children with chronic functional nausea or functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results of the study will be publicly disclosed to the public, without any restrictions, in peer-reviewed journal and international conferences. The study is approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U) in the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5814.

Towards an individual screening strategy for first-degree relatives of celiac patients.

Celiac disease (CD) is known to be more prevalent in first-degree relatives of patients. In this retrospective cohort study of 609 relatives between 1994 and 2016, we investigated the effect of sex, HLA type, and age at time of index celiac diagnosis. Pearson's chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used as statistical analyses. CD screening was carried out for 427 relatives (70%), resulting in a prevalence of 15%. HLA typing in 335 relatives showed HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positivity in 87.5%. In 63% of children and all parents, celiac disease was diagnosed at first screening. It was diagnosed significantly more often in females, HLA-DQ2 homozygosity, and children (all p < 0.05). In children aged 0-1 year at time of index diagnosis, celiac disease was diagnosed after consecutive screening in 58%, after 3.9 ± 2.5 (max 10) years (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Future screening policies for relatives of celiac patients should include retesting, especially in HLA-positive relatives younger than 10 years of age. In addition, one-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients. What is Known: • Celiac disease is more prevalent in first-degree relatives of celiac patients (risk 3-12%). • HLA-DQ2 homozygous sisters/daughters are at highest risk (25%). What is New: • If younger than 10 years of age, repeated testing is necessary in HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive first-degree relatives when celiac disease is diagnosed in a family. • One-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients.

Assessment of dietary compliance in celiac children using a standardized dietary interview.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Compliance to a gluten free diet (GFD) in celiac disease (CD) is ideally assessed by dietary interviews, albeit time-consuming. Short dietary questionnaires have been developed for adults but not for children. Primary aim was to compare GFD compliance in celiac children, measured by a short dietary questionnaire against a dietary interview. Secondary aims were correlation between both questionnaires and celiac antibodies and identifying variables predicting noncompliance. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, participants in the E-health CoelKids study, completed a short dietary questionnaire and standardized dietary interview together with measurement of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TG2A). Results of the questionnaires were assigned under similar categories. Factors possibly influencing dietary compliance were recorded. Where appropriate, Pearson's Chi-square test for trend, unpaired t-test, Cohen's kappa and one-way ANOVA were used. RESULTS: 151 of 165 participating patients were studied, 66% were female. Mean age was 11.3 years (2-26, SD 5.4), mean age at CD diagnosis was 4.9 years (1-23, SD 4.0). The short questionnaire and dietary interview correlated poorly, detecting problems in dietary adherence in 14% and 52% of the patients, respectively (Cohen's kappa 0.034). Only the short questionnaire correlated with TG2A (p = 0.003). Only older age was associated with noncompliance, the mean age of completely nonadherent, adherent but committing errors, and strictly adherent patients were 15.5, 11.5 and 10.1 years, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the dietary interview, short dietary questionnaires and TG2A serology failed to detect dietary transgressions in CD children, wherein adolescents were shown to be at highest risk.