The NCS code of practice for the quality assurance of treatment planning systems (NCS-35).

A subcommittee of the Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry (NCS) was initiated in 2018 with the task to update and extend a previous publication (NCS-15) on the quality assurance of treatment planning systems (TPS) (Bruinviset al2005). The field of treatment planning has changed considerably since 2005. Whereas the focus of the previous report was more on the technical aspects of the TPS, the scope of this report is broader with a focus on a department wide implementation of the TPS. New sections about education, automated planning, information technology (IT) and updates are therefore added. Although the scope is photon therapy, large parts of this report will also apply to all other treatment modalities. This paper is a condensed version of these guidelines; the full version of the report in English is freely available from the NCS website (http://radiationdosimetry.org/ncs/publications). The paper starts with the scope of this report in relation to earlier reports on this subject. Next, general aspects of the commissioning process are addressed, like e.g. project management, education, and safety. It then focusses more on technical aspects such as beam commissioning and patient modeling, dose representation, dose calculation and (automated) plan optimisation. The final chapters deal with IT-related subjects and scripting, and the process of updating or upgrading the TPS.

Adaptive cone-beam CT planning improves long-term biochemical disease-free survival for 125I prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Determining the independent effect of additional intraoperative adaptive C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) planning vs. transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided interactive planning alone in 125I brachytherapy for prostate cancer (PCa) on biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: T1/T2-stage PCa patients receiving TRUS-guided brachytherapy from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed. From October 2006, patients received additional intraoperative adaptive CBCT planning for dosimetric evaluation and subsequent remedial seed placement in underdosed areas. Patients were stratified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate BDFS (primary outcome), overall survival, and PCa-specific survival (secondary outcomes). Cox regression was used to assess the relation between CBCT use and biochemical failure (BF) and overall mortality. RESULTS: In all, 1623 patients were included. Median followup was 99 months (interquartile range 70-115) for TRUS patients (n = 613) and 51 months (interquartile range 29-70) for CBCT patients (n = 1010). BF occurred 203 times and 206 patients died, 26 from PCa. For TRUS and CBCT patients, 7-year BDFS was 87.2% vs. 93.5% (log rank: p = 0.04) for low, 75.9% vs. 88.5% (p < 0.001) for intermediate, and 57.1% vs. 85.0% for high-risk patients (p < 0.001). For TRUS and CBCT patients, 7-year PCa-specific survival was 96.0% vs. 100% (p < 0.0001). After Cox regression, CBCT patients had lower hazard of BF: hazard ratio (HR) 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.33; p < 0.0001). Corrected for confounders, CBCT remained a predictor of BF: HR 0.51 (95% CI: 0.31-0.86; p = 0.01) but not for overall mortality: HR 0.66 (95% CI: 0.40-1.07; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Additional intraoperative adaptive CBCT planning in 125I prostate brachytherapy leads to a significant increase in BDFS in all NCCN risk groups.

Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model for biochemical failure after whole-gland salvage iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Localized recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be curatively treated using salvage iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy. Selection is hampered by a lack of predictive factors for cancer control. This study aims to develop and internally validate a prognostic model for biochemical failure (BF) after salvage (125)I brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Whole-gland salvage (125)I brachytherapy patients were treated between 1993 and 2010 in two radiotherapy centers in the Netherlands. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess the predictive value of clinical parameters related to BF (Phoenix-definition [prostate-specific antigen [PSA]-nadir + 2.0 ng/mL]). Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The model's discriminatory ability was assessed with Harrell's C-statistic. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (2000 data sets). Goodness-of-fit was evaluated with calibration plots. All analyses were performed using the recently published TRIPOD (Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement. RESULTS: After median followup of 74 months (range 5-138), 43 of a total 62 patients developed BF. In multivariable analysis, disease-free survival interval (DFSI) after primary therapy and pre-salvage prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) were predictors of BF: corrected hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.999; p = 0.04) and 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99; p = 0.03), both for a 1-month increase (optimism-adjusted C-statistic 0.70). Calibration was accurate up to 36 months. Of patients with PSADT >30 months and DFSI >60 months, 36-month biochemical disease-free survival was >75%. Every 12-month increase in DFSI will allow 3-month decrease in PSADT while maintaining the same biochemical recurrence-free rates. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented results from a cohort of patients undergoing salvage (125)I-brachytherapy. Our data show that better selection of patients is possible with the DFSI and PSADT.

Dose to fingertips of staff preparing stranded iodine-125 seeds for permanent prostate implants.

The aim of this study is to measure radiation dose to the fingertips of occupationally exposed workers handling stranded iodine-125 seeds during prostate implants. The doses were measured by thermoluminescence dosimetry at the nail of the index finger of both hands in three hospitals in the Netherlands. In all hospitals, measurements were carried out during the preparation of stranded IBt seeds, type Intersource(®) 1251L. The fingertip doses per procedure (mean ± SD) to the fingertip for workers from the three hospitals were estimated to be 0.29 ± 0.15 mSv (n = 6), <0.03 ± <0.02 mSv (n = 8) and 0.31 ± 0.16 mSv (n=16), respectively. The lower doses found for the hospital 2 workers are presumably related to the heavier shielding and longer utensils used in that hospital. Even in the case of hundreds of implant procedures per year, dose to the fingertips for occupationally exposed workers preparing stranded seeds is expected to be well below the annual limit for extremities of 500 mSv.

Improving locoregional hyperthermia delivery using the 3-D controlled AMC-8 phased array hyperthermia system: a preclinical study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is preclinical evaluation of our newly developed regional hyperthermia system providing 3-D SAR control: the AMC-8 phased array consisting of two rings, each with four 70 MHz waveguides. It was designed to achieve higher tumour temperatures and improve the clinical effectiveness of locoregional hyperthermia. METHODS: The performance of the AMC-8 system was evaluated with simulations and measurements aiming at heating a centrally located target region in rectangular (30 x 30 x 110 cm) and elliptical (36 x 24 x 80 cm) homogeneous tissue equivalent phantoms. Three properties were evaluated and compared to its predecessor, the 2-D AMC-4 single ring four waveguide array: (1) spatial control and (2) size of the SAR focus, (3) the ratio between maximum SAR outside the target region and SAR in the focus. Distance and phase difference between the two rings were varied. RESULTS: (1) Phase steering provides 3-D SAR control for the AMC-8 system. (2) The SAR focus is more elongated compared to the AMC-4 system, yielding a lower SAR level in the focus when using the same total power. This is counter-balanced by (3) a superficial SAR deposition which is half of that in the AMC-4 system, yielding a more favourable ratio between normal tissue and target SAR and allowing higher total power and up to 30% more SAR in the focus for 3 cm ring distance. CONCLUSION: The AMC-8 system is capable of 3-D SAR control and its SAR distribution is more favourable than for the 2-D AMC-4 system. This result promises improvement in clinical tumour temperatures.