Simulation-Based Education of Endovascular Scrub Nurses Reduces Stress and Improves Team Performance.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular procedures have become commonplace in vascular surgery. This development calls for new training strategies for future specialists. Most simulation-based education (SBE) programs have a monodisciplinary focus on physicians, although successful surgery is a multidisciplinary team effort. Mental stress impairs the learning process and surgical performance and heart rate variability (HRV) can be measured as a proxy for both mental and physical stress. This study aims to assess how SBE of endovascular scrub nurses affects team performance and HRV during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective interventional study in which EVAR-inexperienced scrub nurses followed a focused SBE EVAR program. During real-life EVAR procedures, HRV was continuously recorded with a wireless electrocardiogram patch and multidisciplinary team performance was assessed with the Imperial College Error CAPture (ICECAP) tool, before and after the SBE program, allowing each scrub nurse to serve as their own control. Eight scrub nurses with experience in lower limb endovascular procedures, but not EVAR, were invited to participate. RESULTS: Seven participants completed the study. In five of seven scrub nurses, HRV-derived stress levels during real-time EVAR procedures were lower after SBE compared to before SBE. Mean HRV increased from 24 msec to 35 msec (P < 0.001), indicating stress level reduction. Before SBE, the mean number of errors/hour was 7.3 (standard deviation ± 1.8) compared to 3.6 (standard deviation ± 2.7) after SBE. Most errors were categorized as technical (58 %) and communicative (23 %). CONCLUSIONS: SBE of scrub nurses may improve team performance and may lower mental stress during EVAR procedures. In this small study, we suggest using mental stress, as evaluated with HRV, and multidisciplinary team performance, as evaluated with ICECAP, to assess SBE effectiveness in real-case EVAR procedures. This SBE program and live ICECAP observations and electrocardiogram patches was well-accepted by scrub nurses and the entire team.

European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Certification of Theoretical and Practical Competences in Basic Vascular Ultrasound: Validity Investigation of the Assessment Tools.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the Assessment of basic Vascular Ultrasound Expertise (AVAUSE) tool, and to establish a pass/fail score for each component, to support decisions for certification. METHODS: A cross sectional validation study performed during the European Society for Vascular Surgery's annual meeting. Validity evidence was sought for the theoretical test and two practical tests based on Messick's framework. The participants were vascular surgeons, vascular surgical trainees, sonographers, and nurses with varying experience levels. Five vascular ultrasound experts developed the theoretical and two practical test components of the AVAUSE tool for each test component. Two stations were set up for carotid examinations and two for superficial venous incompetence (SVI) examinations. Eight raters were assigned in pairs to each station. Three methods were used to set pass/fail scores: contrasting groups' method; rater consensus; and extended Angoff. RESULTS: Nineteen participants were enrolled. Acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for the AVAUSE theoretical (0.93), carotid (0.84), and SVI (0.65) practical test were shown. In the carotid examination, inter-rater reliability (IRR) for the two rater pairs was good: 0.68 and 0.78, respectively. The carotid scores correlated significantly with years of experience (Pearson's r = 0.56, p = .013) but not with number of examinations in the last five years. For SVI, IRR was excellent at 0.81 and 0.87. SVI performance scores did not correlate with years of experience and number of examinations. The pass/fail score set by the contrasting groups' method was 29 points out of 50. The rater set pass/fail scores were 3.0 points for both carotid and SVI examinations and were used to determine successful participants. Ten of 19 participants passed the tests and were certified. CONCLUSION: Validity evidence was sought and established for the AVAUSE comprehensive tool, including pass/fail standards. AVAUSE can be used to assess competences in basic vascular ultrasound, allowing operators to progress towards independent practice.