Treatment of respiratory impairment in patients with motor neuron disease in the Netherlands: patient preference and timing of referral.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We assessed the first evaluation at a large ventilation clinic in the Netherlands to: (i) determine what proportion of patients with motor neuron disease would benefit from earlier referral; and (ii) examine the patient preferences regarding ventilatory support. METHODS: Observational study at a single centre with a catchment area of 7.6 million inhabitants. Data on disease status, the referral process and patients' preferences regarding ventilatory support were collected during the first home ventilation services (HVS) assessment and analysed for correlation with the presence of daytime hypercapnia and suspected nocturnal hypoventilation. The latter conditions require immediate (within 48 h) or subacute (within 3 weeks) initiation of ventilatory support. RESULTS: Vital capacity (in percentage of predicted value, VC%pred) was assessed by referring physicians in 84% of the 217 referred patients; the mean VC%pred was 69% (SD 16). One-hundred and ninety-one patients attended the first HVS assessment without ventilatory support, at a median of 21 days following referral: 18% had respiratory failure (daytime hypercapnia), 19% had normocapnia but were suspected of nocturnal hypoventilation, and 63% had normocapnia without symptoms. Following the HVS assessment, 25 patients (13%) declined home mechanical ventilation; this occurred more often in patients with (14/70) compared with patients without respiratory impairment (11/121; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A meaningful proportion of patients who desire ventilatory support are referred to a ventilation clinic after already developing respiratory failure. Future studies could examine means, including more sensitive respiratory measures, to detect those patients who could benefit from earlier referral.

[Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: mechanical ventilation--or not right?]. / Amyotrofische laterale sclerose: beademen--of juist niet?

In two patients (men aged 64 and 62 years, respectively) with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) tracheostomy ventilation was initiated following (imminent) acute respiratory failure; in one patient this was done because advance directives were lacking, while in the other non-invasive ventilation (NIPPV) was no longer an option. A third ALS patient, a woman aged 36 years, already had chronic respiratory failure when she presented at the local centre for home mechanical ventilation. As a result, the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was impossible. Instead, she had to use a nasopharyngeal feeding tube, which diminished the effectiveness of her NIPPV. The fourth patient, a man aged 60 years, was referred in good time and hence had sufficient time to consider domiciliary ventilation. Following the placement of a PEG he started NIPPV electively. In patients with ALS, domiciliary ventilation should be discussed early in the course of the disease. Advance directives with regard to domiciliary ventilation are important, not only to avoid undesired (invasive) ventilation, but also with respect to the placement of a PEG and the appropriate use of oxygen and morphine.