A matched cohort study between cementless TKA and cemented TKA shows a reduction in tourniquet time and manipulation rate.

INTRODUCTION: Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is now becoming more acceptable with the advent of newer ongrowth constructs and better initial fixation. It has been proposed that cementless TKA may save OR time and result in a lower incidence of manipulation. This study was designed to assess the difference between cemented and cementless TKA. METHODS: Our hospital statistician performed a matched cohort analysis between 127 cementless TKAs and 127 cemented TKRs performed by a single surgeon. Patients were matched on age and BMI. Mean tourniquet time between the cemented and cementless TKAs was assessed as well as the rate of manipulation between these groups. Of note, a tourniquet was routinely used in both the cementless and cemented cohorts to reduce confounding bias. RESULTS: A total of 127 cementless TKAs with a mean age of 60.8 years and mean BMI 32.2 were compared to 127 cemented TKAs with a mean age of 61.5 years and mean BMI of 32.2 at an average follow-up of 2.0 years. There was a statistically significant reduction in tourniquet time in the cementless TKA cohort at 45.7 min compared to the cemented TKA cohort at 54.8 min (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss was similar in both the cementless (179.5 ml) and cemented (196 ml) cohorts (p = 0.3) and postoperative outcomes, including UCLA score.In addition, the cementless TKA cohort had a manipulation rate of 0% compared to 3.1% for the cemented TKA group (p = 0.044). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: While cementless and cemented TKA have shown similar PROMs and survivorship, we demonstrated a significant reduction in tourniquet time with cementless TKRs, with similar estimated blood loss, and a lower incidence of manipulation with cementless TKRs in this matched cohort study. The increased cost of a cementless implant may be negated if one considers the cost savings of not using cement, the cost savings of not performing manipulations, and the shorter operative time.

Mid-level constraint may correct coronal plane imbalance without compromising patient function in patients with severe osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Mid-level constraint (MLC) in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) offer surgeons the opportunity to obtain a well-balanced varus-valgus balance in the setting of slight ligament imbalance. As such, we sought to evaluate patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), alignment correction, and rate of revision between the MLC group and a cohort of posterior stabilized (PS) knees in a cohort of patients with preoperative degenerative arthritis. MATERIALS/METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 57 MLC knees and 96 PS knees from a single manufacturer that were implanted by a single surgeon. We found the average age (68.91 vs. 68.40, p = 0.72), average BMI (30.88 vs. 29.14, p = 0.10), and gender breakdown (25:32 vs. 28:69, p = 0.08) to be comparable between the two cohorts. The latest follow-up was 4.0 years in the MLC group and 3.8 years in the PS group, p = 0.26. RESULTS: The two cohorts inherently resulted in significantly different preoperative deformities (MCL knees: average varus deformity 13.75°, average valgus deformity 12.37°; PS knees average varus deformity 15.14°, average valgus deformity 10.8°). There were more valgus knees in the MLC group (36 vs. 22 (p < 0.001), respectively), but the postoperative alignment was the same. MLC cohort: preoperative varus group had 4.74° of valgus postoperatively, preoperative valgus group had 5.43° of valgus postoperatively. PS cohort: preoperative varus group had 5.40° of valgus postoperatively, preoperative valgus group had 4.80° of valgus postoperatively. We found a significant difference in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KSCRS-Total) between the two groups (MLC 163.9 vs. PS 132.8, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in terms of Range of Motion (ROM) (MLC 121° vs. PS 122°, p = 0.58), anterior knee pain (MLC 1.75 vs. PS 1.81, p = 0.39), or Pain VAS (MLC 25.1 vs. PS 28.6, p = 0.46). There was similar rate of revision between the cohorts (3.5% MLC vs. 2.10% PS, p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in manipulation rate (8.78% MLC vs. 9.40% PS, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that the use of MLC in TKA allows surgeons to correct preoperative deformities with equal or improved functional outcomes compared to PS knees. In general, we recommend that surgeons try to balance the knee and use the least amount of constraint possible but should consider MLC when needed and use such implants if they are unable to balance the varus-valgus gap.

Lack of early dislocation for dual mobility vs. fixed bearing total hip arthroplasty: A multi-center analysis of comparable cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Dislocation is a major cause of morbidity and revision surgery following total hip arthroplasty (THA). To address such issues, dual mobility (DM) bearings were introduced as a more stable alternative to fixed-bearing (FB) prostheses. As such, we compared DM and FB systems in a cohort study in terms of dislocations, readmissions, and revisions. METHODS: A 27 multi-center retrospective review was performed of 664 DM and 218 FB cases from the same manufacturer with mean follow-up of 2.09 years and 1.83 years, respectively. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Harris Hip Score (HHS), SF12, EQ5D, and Lower Extremity Activity Score (LEAS) were evaluated as well as dislocation rates, readmissions, and revisions rates. We also performed a survivorship analysis through Kaplan-Meier estimator. Students t-test was used for normally distributed continuous data and Fisher exact test (P < 0.05) was used for discrete data. RESULTS: There were 0 dislocations in the DM (0%) group and 2 dislocations in the FB (0.92%) group (p = 0.06). Latest follow up HHS revealed a significant difference between groups (91.44 DM and 87.81 FB; p = 0.006). In addition, there was significant difference between DM and FB on SF12 Physical Component Score (PCS) (46.83 and 44.55, respectively, p = 0.015). Also, readmission rates at 30, 60 and 90 days remained lower for DM than for FB at each time point (1.05% vs. 2.75%, 1.81% vs. 2.75%, and 1.81% vs. 2.75, respectively). Overall, DM had a lower revision rate at 1.51% compared to 2.29% for FB (p = 0.24). The revision breakdown for DM revealed 0 (0%) for both Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM) and Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) due to the acetabular component.) There was a difference, 14 (87.5%) for ADM and 2 (12.5%) due to the femoral component. The survivorship analysis revealed no significance difference between DM and FB at 4 years (97.90% and 97.26%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In comparison to patients who undergo FB THA, DM bearings have improved PROMs and a lower rate of dislocation, readmission, and revision.

Anatomic dual mobility compared to modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Dual mobility (DM) has been used in primary total hip arthroplasty recently for their low dislocation rates, low revision rates, and improved patient functional outcomes. We compared 2 DM systems, anatomic dual mobility (ADM; Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) and modular dual mobility (MDM; Stryker, Mahwah, NJ), to determine differences in dislocation rates, revision rates, and patient outcome scores. METHODS: The study was a single-center matched retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty surgery with an ADM or MDM system by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2017. Demographics, operative details, postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve to compare survival time between groups was collected as well. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-four patients were included in the study with 287 patients matched in each group with mean 2.86 years of follow-up. The dislocation rate in each cohort was 0%, the acetabular-specific revision rate was 0%, and in each cohort, overall revision rate in each cohort was 1.7%. In general, patient-reported outcomes were similar for each group (Harris Hip Score Pain (P = .919), Harris Hip Score Function (P = .736), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (P = .139), Pain Visual Analog Scale (P = .146), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (P = .99), University of California, Los Angeles (P = .417), and Harris Hip Score Total (P = .136). There was a slight clinically insignificant increase in hip flexion between the cohorts favoring the ADM group (98.6 ± 9.8 vs 94.0 ± 9.7, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both DM systems had similar patient-reported outcomes that were quite favorable. At 2.86 years of follow-up, neither the ADM nor MDM systems demonstrated dislocation, and both had low acetabular-specific and overall revision rates in this matched cohort study.

Pregabalin and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multidose trial.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin may reduce postoperative pain and opioid use. Higher doses may be more effective, but may cause sedation and confusion. This prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study tested the hypothesis that pregabalin reduces pain at 2 weeks after total knee arthroplasty, but increases drowsiness and confusion. METHODS: Patients (30 per group) received capsules containing pregabalin (0, 50, 100, or 150 mg); two capsules before surgery, one capsule twice a day until postoperative day (POD) 14, one on POD15, and one on POD16. Multimodal analgesia included femoral nerve block, epidural analgesia, oxycodone-paracetamol, and meloxicam. The primary outcome was pain with flexion (POD14). RESULTS: Pregabalin did not reduce pain at rest, with ambulation, or with flexion at 2 weeks (P=0.69, 0.23, and 0.90, respectively). Pregabalin increased POD1 drowsiness (34.5, 37.9, 55.2, and 58.6% in the 0, 50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively; P=0.030), but did not increase confusion (0, 3.5, 0, and 3.5%, respectively; P=0.75). Pregabalin had no effect on acute or chronic pain, opioid consumption, or analgesic side-effects. Pregabalin reduced POD14 patient satisfaction [1-10 scale, median (first quartile, third quartile): 9 (8, 10), 8 (7, 10), 8 (5, 9), and 8 (6, 9.3), respectively; P=0.023). Protocol compliance was 63% by POD14 (50.0, 70.0, 76.7, and 56.7% compliance, respectively), with no effect of dose on compliance. Per-protocol analysis of compliant patients showed no effect of pregabalin on pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin had no beneficial effects, but increased sedation and decreased patient satisfaction. This study does not support routine perioperative pregabalin for total knee arthroplasty patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01333956.

Analgesia after total knee replacement: local infiltration versus epidural combined with a femoral nerve blockade: a prospective, randomised pragmatic trial.

In a randomised controlled pragmatic trial we investigated whether local infiltration analgesia would result in earlier readiness for discharge from hospital after total knee replacement (TKR) than patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) plus femoral nerve block. A total of 45 patients with a mean age of 65 years (49 to 81) received a local infiltration with a peri-articular injection of bupivacaine, morphine and methylprednisolone, as well as adjuvant analgesics. In 45 PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients with a mean age of 67 years (50 to 84), analgesia included a bupivacaine nerve block, bupivacaine/hydromorphone PCEA, and adjuvant analgesics. The mean time until ready for discharge was 3.2 days (1 to 14) in the local infiltration group and 3.2 days (1.8 to 7.0) in the PCEA+femoral nerve blockade group. The mean pain scores for patients receiving local infiltration were higher when walking (p = 0.0084), but there were no statistically significant differences at rest. The mean opioid consumption was higher in those receiving local infiltration. The choice between these two analgesic pathways should not be made on the basis of time to discharge after surgery. Most secondary outcomes were similar, but PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients had lower pain scores when walking and during continuous passive movement. If PCEA+femoral nerve blockade is not readily available, local infiltration provides similar length of stay and similar pain scores at rest following TKR.

Anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting using the corticocancellous reamer system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting procedure using a corticocancellous acetabular reamer system. DESIGN: A total of 390 bone grafting procedures were reviewed using retrospective chart review. Two hundred twenty procedures were performed using the reamer system, and 170 were performed using traditional techniques (cortical strip, tricortical wedge, and cancellous trap door grafts). SETTING: The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Operative cases involving an anterior iliac crest bone graft procedure between January 1, 1991 and February 28, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications were organized by the categories major, intermediate, and minor. Statistical analysis included assessment of comorbidity to determine risk factors that may be associated with a propensity for complications. RESULTS: Of the 390 patients reviewed, 13.1 percent (51 of 390) developed a total of seventy-one complications. Of the seventy-one complications, forty were reamer-associated and thirty-one were traditional method-associated complications. As compared with the traditional group, major morbidity was lower in the reamer group (0.9 percent [2 of 220] as compared with 1.8 percent [3 of 170] [ p = 0.4]). Intermediate and minor morbidity were slightly higher in the reamer group than in the traditional group (5.9 percent [13 of 220] as compared with 5.3 percent [9 of 170] [ p = 0.7] and 9.5 percent [21 of 220] as compared with 7.1 percent [12 of 170] [ p = 0.4], respectively). Of the forty reamer-associated complications, 90 percent (36 of 40) resolved within ninety days (average 36.6 days). Of the thirty-one traditional method-associated complications, 74.2 percent (23 of 31) were resolved by 90 days (average 50.6 days). Using logistical regression analysis obesity (body mass index) ( p = 0.03) and smoking ( p = 0.03) were correlated with development of a complication. Furthermore, if a patient was obese and a smoker, the analysis predicted an 83 percent chance of developing a complication. CONCLUSIONS: The reamer technique was found to be safe and efficacious while producing a large amount of autogenous corticocancellous bone graft. Overall complication rates for the reamer and the traditional groups were comparable. The corticocancellous reamer system represents an effective option for bone graft harvesting.

The effect of preoperative donation of autologous blood on deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty.

We have assessed the effect of the donation of autologous blood and the preoperative level of haemoglobin on the prevalence of postoperative thromboembolism in 2043 patients who had a total hip arthroplasty. The level of haemoglobin was determined seven to ten days before surgery and all patients had venography of the operated leg on the fifth postoperative day. The number of patients who had donated autologous blood (1037) was similar to that who had not (1006). A significant decrease in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) was noted in those who had donated blood preoperatively (9.0%) compared with those who had not (13.5%) (p = 0.003). For all patients, the lower the preoperative level of haemoglobin the less likely it was that a postoperative DVT would develop. Of those who had donated blood, 0.3% developed a postoperative pulmonary embolism compared with 0.7% in those who had not, but this difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found in the requirements for transfusion between the two groups.

[Prevention of thrombosis in hip prosthesis implantation]. / Thromboseprophylaxe in der Hüftendoprothetik.

Deep venous thrombosis is one of the most common perioperative complications after total hip arthroplasty. Systemic anticoagulation has been the gold standard for prophylaxis of postoperative deep venous thrombosis. There is no doubt that early mobilization and the use of pneumatic compression devices decrease the overall deep venous thrombosis rate. Single postoperative prophylaxis may decrease the overall deep venous thrombosis rate to 15-20% and the proximal deep venous thrombosis rate to approximately 7%. However,the activation of thrombogenesis is mainly an intraoperative event. The position of the extremity during the implantation of the femoral component leads to obstruction of the venous outflow. At the same time, the coagulation cascade is activated and markers of thrombogenesis in the blood are increased. By combining intraoperative (hypotensive epidural anesthesia and intraoperative heparin) and postoperative (pneumatic compression devices and aspirin) prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis, the total deep venous thrombosis rate is reduced to less than 10% and the proximal deep venous thrombosis rate is reduced to 2%. Patients with increased risk for deep venous thrombosis should receive Coumadin or low-molecular weight heparin. In addition, hypotensive epidural anesthesia reduces the intraoperative blood loss and the need for postoperative blood transfusion.

Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severly affected knees.

A consecutive series of 24 knees in 21 patients who received a Finn rotating hinge for primary (nine knees) or revision (15 knees) total knee arthroplasty between August 1993 and January 1997 was reviewed. The average followup was 33 months (range, 21-62 months) for all patients in the study. Seventeen patients (20 knees) were followed up for more than 2 years. Twenty-four knees (21 patients) were categorized according to Knee Society scoring criteria: 37.5% (nine knees) were Category A, 25% (six knees) were Category B, and 37.5% (nine knees) were Category C. Using the Knee Society knee and function scores, clinical and radiographic results were assessed and outcome analysis was determined. The average Knee Society knee score improved from 44 points (range, 5-64 points) before surgery to 83 points (range, 45-95 points) after surgery; the average functional score according to the Knee Society system improved from 10 points (range, 0-35 points) before surgery to 45 points (range, 0-100 points) after surgery. Pain and function markedly improved after surgery. For treatment of the most severely affected knees with compromised bone and ligamentous instability, the Finn total knee replacement appears to be an acceptable option. As a rotating hinge design, the prosthesis at early followup provides excellent pain relief, restoration of walking capacity, and stabilization, without evidence of early mechanical failure.

Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

We performed a meta-analysis of the English literature to assess the efficacy of four common regimes for thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: aspirin, warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and pneumatic compression. We reviewed 136 articles and abstracts published between January 1980 and December 1997. Papers not using routine venography and a lung scan or angiography to detect deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) respectively, were excluded. Of the 136 studies, 23 with 6,001 patients were selected. The incidence of DVT was 53% (1,701/3,214) in the aspirin group, 45% (541/1,203) in the warfarin group, 29% (311/1,075) in the LMWH group, and 17% (86/509) in the pneumatic compression device group. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices and LMWH were significantly better than warfarin (p < 0.0001) or aspirin (p < 0.0001) in preventing DVT. The incidence of asymptomatic PE was 11.7% in the aspirin group (222/1,901), 8.2% (101/1,229) in the warfarin group and 6.3% (24/378) in the pneumatic compression group. No studies with LMWH used routine lung scans. Warfarin and pneumatic compression were significantly better than aspirin in preventing asymptomatic PE (p < 0.05). The incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.3% (23/1,800) in the aspirin group, 0.4% (2/559) in the warfarin group, 0.5% (2/416) in the LMWH group and 0% (0/177) in the pneumatic compression group. No statistically significant difference was noted between the above prophylactic regimes due to the very small incidence of symptomatic PE. Prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease in TKA may have to include a combination of some of the above regimes to incorporate their advantages.

Pneumatic compression hemodynamics in total hip arthroplasty.

A crossover study was performed to evaluate the effect of several pneumatic compression devices and active dorsoplantar flexion in 10 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Using the Acuson 128XP/10 duplex ultrasound unit with a 5-MHz linear array probe, peak venous velocity and venous volume were assessed above and below the greater saphenous vein and common femoral vein junction. A computer generated randomization table was used to determine the order of the test conditions. The pneumatic compression devices evaluated included two foot pumps, one foot and calf pump, one calf pump, and three calf and thigh pumps. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance and analysis of variance with covariance between devices and patients. The covariates tested were the baseline measurements and the order in which the devices were tested. Differences between devices relate in part to the frequency and rate of inflation and the location and type of compression. Pulsatile calf and foot and calf pneumatic compression with a rapid inflation time produced the greatest increase in peak venous velocity, whereas compression of the calf and thigh showed the greatest increase in venous volume. Because patient and nursing compliance is essential to the success of mechanical prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease, the more simple, yet efficacious, devices that are easier to apply and less cumbersome appear to have a greater likelihood of success. In the active and alert patient, active dorsoplantar flexion should be encouraged.

Primary total hip replacement with a noncemented acetabular component: minimum 5-year clinical follow-up.

The results of 123 total hip replacements with a noncemented Harris-Galante I acetabular component were reviewed (minimum 5-year clinical follow-up). The average clinical follow-up was 7 years (range, 5-10.8 years). No acetabular components were revised for loosening. One cup was revised for recurrent dislocation. In 3 cases, the acetabular liner was replaced at the time of femoral component revision (aseptic loosening), and in 1 case, a liner was revised because of recurrent dislocations. Of the hips, 92 had a complete set of radiographs for analysis. None of the acetabular components had migrated. Of the 92 acetabular components, 90 were considered radiographically stable (98%). Of these hips, 24 had linear radiolucencies of < or =2 mm in < or =2 of 4 zones and were considered stable. Two cups (2%) were considered possibly unstable. One of these had a linear radiolucent line in 3 zones, and the other had an osteolytic lesion measuring 6 x 11 mm in greatest dimensions. No acetabular components were definitely unstable. The average Harris Hip Score improved from 50 points (range, 17-89 points) preoperatively to 95 points (range, 74-99 points) at the latest follow-up examination. The average Hospital for Special Surgery hip score improved from 21 points (range, 10-31 points) preoperatively to 38 points (range, 27-40) at the last follow-up examination. Noncemented acetabular fixation with the Harris-Galante I component showed excellent clinical results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up.

Thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty using intraoperative heparin and postoperative pneumatic foot compression.

A prospective study was performed to assess the clinical efficacy of intraoperative heparin combined with postoperative pneumatic foot compression and aspirin for thromboembolic disease prophylaxis after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This group of 48 patients all had a primary TKA performed under epidural anesthesia. The cohort of patients was compared with a similar cohort of patients matched for age and comorbidity. The control group consisted of 61 patients (41 unilateral patients, 20 bilateral patients) with 81 TKAs who received epidural anesthesia and postoperative pneumatic foot compression and aspirin. The same surgeon and anesthesiologist performed all cases. All patients had the pneumatic foot compression device applied in the recovery room and received 325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin twice a day beginning the night of surgery. Venography was performed on the fifth postoperative day for both groups to determine the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In the control group with postoperative pneumatic foot compression (group 1), the overall incidence of DVT was 27% (22 of 81), with 10% (8 of 81) major calf DVT and no proximal (popliteal or femoral) DVT. In the study group with intraoperative heparin and postoperative pneumatic foot compression (group 2), the overall incidence of DVT was 25% (12 of 48), with 8% (4 of 48) major calf DVT and no proximal DVT. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 for the incidence of overall DVT (P > .05) or major calf DVT (P > .05). No complications were associated with the use of intraoperative heparin or the pneumatic compression device, and no patient developed a symptomatic pulmonary embolism up to 3 months postoperatively. Although this study confirms that pneumatic foot compression combined with aspirin is an effective form of DVT prophylaxis after TKA, the added benefit of intraoperative heparin was not statistically proven. Although greater statistical power is needed to determine whether intraoperative heparin provides an added benefit, this study reveals a low incidence of DVT in TKA with this protocol.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a specific hypotensive epidural anesthesia protocol.

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures performed by 3 attending surgeons on the Arthroplasty Service at our institution from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1993. All surgery was performed under a specific hypotensive epidural anesthesia protocol. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia at our institution provides a lower level of hypotension (mean arterial pressure of 50-60 mmHg) as compared to hypotensive anesthesia used more generally around the world (mean arterial pressure >70 mmHg). For each patient, hospital and postdischarge office records for a minimum of 3 months after surgery were reviewed for the type of postoperative screening test, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Overall, 2,592 primary unilateral THAs were performed with 78.6% (2,037 of 2,592) of patients receiving a venogram. Our protocol for thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in these patients included aspirin postoperatively as well as antithromboembolic disease stockings and early ambulation (24-48 hours postoperatively). The 555 patients who did not receive venography were managed with a different protocol that included warfarin postoperatively as well as antithromboembolic disease stockings and early ambulation. This high-risk group consisted of patients who received warfarin preoperatively (ie, cardiac valve) or patients with a history of DVT who were to receive warfarin postoperatively, regardless of venography result. Overall, DVT was diagnosed in 10.3% (210 of 2,037) of patients who had a venogram. Of these patients who had venography, 2.3% (46 of 2,037) had an isolated proximal DVT; 6.0% (123 of 2,037), a distal DVT; and 2.0% (41 of 2,037), both a proximal and a distal DVT. Of the 87 cases of proximal DVT identified, 60.9% (53 of 87) were femoral DVT; 18.4% (16 of 87), popliteal DVT; and 20.7% (18 of 87), both femoral and popliteal DVT. Of the 164 distal DVT, 68.3% (112 of 164) were major calf DVT and 31.7% (52 of 164) were minor calf DVT. The overall incidence of major venous thrombosis (sum of proximal and major calf thrombi) was 9.8% (199 of 2,037) in patients who had venography. Ventilation-perfusion scanning was used selectively in patients symptomatic for PE. Overall, symptomatic PE was diagnosed by ventilation-perfusion scan in 1.0% (26 of 2,592) of patients, with 0.58% (15 of 2,592) of patients having an in-hospital PE. Of the 15 patients who had an in-hospital PE, 11 patients had a venogram, and only 3 of 11 were positive. Late symptomatic PE was defined from discharge (mean, 7 +/- 2 days) to 3 months after discharge from the hospital and occurred in 0.42% (11 of 2,592) of patients. One of the 11 late symptomatic PEs was fatal. In the overall study, this represents 0.04% (1 of 2,592) fatal PE. Of the 11 patients with a late symptomatic PE, 10 had venograms in the hospital, and all 10 were negative for DVT. Overall, in the patients with a positive venogram, the incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.4% (3 of 210), whereas in the patients with a negative venogram, the incidence of symptomatic PE was 0.44% (8 of 1,827). At our institution, patients who undergo primary THA performed with hypotensive epidural anesthesia, postoperative aspirin, antithromboembolic disease stockings, and early ambulation have a low risk for thromboembolic disease.

Dose response of intravenous heparin on markers of thrombosis during primary total hip replacement.

BACKGROUND: Thrombogenesis in total hip replacement (THR) begins during surgery on the femur. This study assesses the effect of two doses of unfractionated intravenous heparin administered before femoral preparation during THR on circulating markers of thrombosis. METHODS: Seventy-five patients undergoing hybrid primary THR were randomly assigned to receive blinded intravenous injection of either saline or 10 or 20 U/kg of unfractionated heparin after insertion of the acetabular component. Central venous blood samples were assayed for prothrombin F1+2 (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), fibrinopeptide A (FPA), and D-dimer. RESULTS: No changes in the markers of thrombosis were noted after insertion of the acetabular component. During surgery on the femur, significant increases in all markers were noted in the saline group (P < 0.0001). Heparin did not affect D-dimer or TAT. Twenty units per kilogram of heparin significantly reduced the increase of F1+2 after relocation of the hip joint (P < 0.001). Administration of both 10 and 20 U/kg significantly reduced the increase in FPA during implantation of the femoral component (P < 0.0001). A fourfold increase in FPA was noted in 6 of 25 patients receiving 10 U/kg of heparin but in none receiving 20 U/kg (P = 0.03). Intraoperative heparin did not affect intra- or postoperative blood loss, postoperative hematocrit, or surgeon's subjective assessments of bleeding. No bleeding complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 20 U/kg of heparin administered before surgery on the femur suppresses fibrin formation during primary THR. This finding provides the pathophysiologic basis for the clinical use of intraoperative heparin during THR.

Venous haemodynamics after total knee arthroplasty: evaluation of active dorsal to plantar flexion and several mechanical compression devices.

We performed a crossover study to evaluate the haemodynamic effect of active dorsal to plantar flexion and seven pneumatic compression devices in ten patients who had a total knee arthroplasty. Using the Acuson 128XP/10 duplex ultrasound unit with a 5MHz linear array probe, we assessed the augmentation of peak venous velocity and venous volume above and below the junction of the greater saphenous and common femoral veins in order to study both the deep and superficial venous systems. The pneumatic compression devices evaluated included two foot pumps (A-V Impulse System and PlexiPulse Foot), a foot-calf pump (PlexiPulse Foot-Calf), a calf pump (VenaFlow System) and three calf-thigh pumps (SCD System, Flowtron DVT and Jobst Athrombic Pump). The devices differed in a number of ways, including the length and location of the sleeve and bladder, the frequency and duration of activation, the rate of pressure rise, and the maximum pressure achieved. A randomisation table was used to determine the order of the test conditions for each patient. The enhancement of peak venous velocity occurred primarily in the deep venous system below the level of the saphenofemoral junction. The increases in peak venous velocity were as follows: active dorsal to plantar flexion 175%; foot pumps, A-V Impulse System 29% and PlexiPulse 65%; foot-calf pump, PlexiPulse, 221%; calf pump, VenaFlow, 302% and calf-thigh pumps, Flowtron DVT 87%, SCD System 116% and Jobst Athrombic Pump 263%. All the devices augmented venous volume, the greatest effect being seen with those incorporating calf compression. The increases in ml/min were found in the deep venous system as follows: foot pumps, A-V Impulse System 9.6 and PlexiPulse Foot 16.7; foot-calf pump, PlexiPulse, 38.1; calf pump, VenaFlow, 26.2; calf-thigh pumps, Flowtron DVT 61.5, SCD System 34.7 and Jobst Athrombic Pump 82.3. Active dorsal to plantar flexion generated 8.5 ml for a single calf contraction.