Ex Vivo Endotoxin Stimulation of Blood for Predicting Survival in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a syndrome characterized by host immune dysfunction, with the extent of immunoparalysis differing among patients. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is used commonly to assess the immune function of critically ill patients with sepsis. However, the reliability of this ex vivo diagnostic test in predicting clinical outcomes remains uncertain. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production from the blood of patients with sepsis predict mortality? Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital stay durations, nosocomial infection rate, and organ recovery rate. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Human sepsis studies from various databases through April 2023 were evaluated. Inclusion criteria encompassed LPS-stimulated blood assays, English language, and reported clinical outcomes. Bias risk was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Relationships between TNF production and mortality were analyzed at sepsis onset and during established sepsis, alongside secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 11,580 studies, 17 studies (14 adult and three pediatric) were selected for analysis. Although 15 studies were evaluated as moderate to high quality using the NOS, it is important to note that some of these studies also had identifiable biases, such as unclear methods of participant recruitment. Nine studies detailed survival outcomes associated with LPS-induced TNF production at sepsis onset, whereas five studies explored TNF production's relationship with mortality during established sepsis. Trends suggested that lower LPS-induced TNF production correlated with higher mortality. However, heterogeneity in methodologies, especially the LPS assay protocol, hindered definitive conclusions. Publication bias was highlighted using funnel plot analysis. Concerning secondary outcomes, diminished TNF production might signify worsening organ dysfunction, although the link between cytokine production and nosocomial infection varied among studies. INTERPRETATION: For functional immune profiling in sepsis, streamlined research methodologies are essential. This entails organizing cohorts based on microbial sources of sepsis, establishing standardized definitions of immunoparalysis, using consistent types and dosages of immune stimulants, adhering to uniform blood incubation conditions, and adopting consistent clinical outcomes.

Diagnosis and Treatment of New-Onset Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation.

This article reviews medical and surgical risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained dysrhythmia in the United States. Evidence for assessment and management of patients with AF, including AF newly identified in the preoperative clinic, immediately preoperatively, intraoperatively, and unstable AF, is presented. A stepwise approach to guide anesthetic decision-making in the assessment of newly identified preoperative AF is proposed. Anesthetic considerations, including the potential impacts of anesthetic and vasopressor selection, and current evidence related to rate control and rhythm control via pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion as well as anticoagulation strategies are discussed.

Emergency Airway Management Outside the Operating Room: Current Evidence and Management Strategies.

Emergency airway management outside the operating room (OR) is often associated with an increased risk of airway related, as well as cardiopulmonary, complications which can impact morbidity and mortality. These emergent airways may take place in the intensive care unit (ICU), where patients are critically ill with minimal physiological reserve, or other areas of the hospital where advanced equipment and personnel are often unavailable. As such, emergency airway management outside the OR requires expertise at manipulation of not only the anatomically difficult airway but also the physiologically and situationally difficult airway. Adequate preparation and appropriate use of airway management techniques are important to prevent complications. Judicious utilization of pre- and apneic oxygenation is important as is the choice of medications to facilitate intubation in this at-risk population. Recent study in critically ill patients has shown that postintubation hemodynamic and respiratory compromise is common, independently associated with poor outcomes and can be impacted by the choice of drugs and techniques used. In addition to adequately preparing for a physiologically difficult airway, enhancing the ability to predict an anatomically difficult airway is essential in reducing complication rates. The use of artificial intelligence in the identification of difficult airways has shown promising results and could be of significant advantage in uncooperative patients as well as those with a questionable airway examination. Incorporating this technology and understanding the physiological, anatomical, and logistical challenges may help providers better prepare for managing such precarious airways and lead to successful outcomes. This review discusses the various challenges associated with airway management outside the OR, provides guidance on appropriate preparation, airway management skills, medication use, and highlights the role of a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to out-of-OR airway management.