Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
Diabet Med ; 37(2): 242-247, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901175

RESUMO

AIM: Diabetes impairs the quality of life of people living with the condition and is a major public health concern. The aim of this paper is to create a state of the nation report of diabetes in the UK. METHODS: Diabetes UK collates information about diabetes from diverse sources. This paper synthesizes these data to create a national report. RESULTS: Some 7% of the UK population are now living with diabetes; approximately one million people have undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, 40 000 children have diabetes and more than 3000 children are diagnosed every year. Forty-nine per cent of people with type 1 diabetes were offered structured education, but only 7.6% attended; the corresponding figures for type 2 diabetes were 90% and 10.4%, respectively. Among people with diabetes, 28% reported having issues obtaining medication or equipment for self-management. Fifty-seven per cent of people with type 1 diabetes and 42% with type 2 diabetes do not receive all eight annual health checks. Around 40% of people with diabetes have diminished psychological well-being. One-third of people have a microvascular complication at the time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes is responsible for 530 myocardial infarctions and 175 amputations every week. The National Health Service spends at least £10 billion a year on diabetes, equivalent to 10% of its budget; 80% is spent treating complications. One in six hospital inpatients has diabetes. CONCLUSION: Diabetes continues to place a significant burden on the individual with diabetes and wider UK society. This report will be updated annually to understand how diabetes is changing across the UK.


Assuntos
Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações do Diabetes/economia , Complicações do Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Irlanda do Norte/epidemiologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prevalência , Escócia/epidemiologia , Medicina Estatal , Doenças não Diagnosticadas/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , País de Gales/epidemiologia
4.
Diabet Med ; 35(12): 1635-1641, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103276

RESUMO

AIM: To review the existing evidence regarding the use of language in clinical encounters. BACKGROUND: Awareness of the importance of language in clinical encounters is mostly lacking or located within broader discussions on communication. METHODS: A scoping study was conducted to review existing research that could increase our understanding of the role language plays as well as identify gaps in knowledge and inform the development of a position statement on language in diabetes care. RESULTS: Evidence shows that, although carefully chosen language can have a positive effect, there is a potential negative impact of language on people's experiences of diabetes care. The use of stigmatizing and discriminatory words during communication between healthcare practitioners and people with diabetes can lead to disengagement with health services as well as sub-optimal diabetes self-management. Clinical encounters can be compromised where language barriers exist or where there is limited understanding of cultural differences that may have an impact on diabetes self-management. What little empirical evidence there is shows that training can improve language and communication skills. CONCLUSION: This review raises a number of questions that are being addressed by the NHS England Language Matters Group, which has developed a set of recommendations to support the use of appropriate language in clinical encounters.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Idioma , Relações Médico-Paciente , Barreiras de Comunicação , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educação Médica Continuada , Humanos , Habilidades Sociais , Reino Unido
5.
Diabet Med ; 35(12): 1630-1634, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29888553

RESUMO

The language used by healthcare professionals can have a profound impact on how people living with diabetes, and those who care for them, experience their condition and feel about living with it day-to-day. At its best, good use of language, both verbal and written, can lower anxiety, build confidence, educate and help to improve self-care. Conversely, poor communication can be stigmatizing, hurtful and undermining of self-care and can have a detrimental effect on clinical outcomes. The language used in the care of those with diabetes has the power to reinforce negative stereotypes, but it also has the power to promote positive ones. The use of language is controversial and has many perspectives. The development of this position statement aimed to take account of these as well as the current evidence base. A working group, representing people with diabetes and key organizations with an interest in the care of people with diabetes, was established to review the use of language. The work of this group has culminated in this position statement for England. It follows the contribution of Australia and the USA to this important international debate. The group has set out practical examples of language that will encourage positive interactions with those living with diabetes and subsequently promote positive outcomes. These examples are based on a review of the evidence and are supported by a simple set of principles.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde , Idioma , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Comitês Consultivos , Barreiras de Comunicação , Inglaterra , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Habilidades Sociais , Terminologia como Assunto
6.
Acute Med ; 15(3): 157-160, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759753

RESUMO

It had become a familiar routine. My seventh admission with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in a year. Each time I was admitted it was the same; a DKA protocol, a diabetes specialist nurse visit, and a few questions from the doctors checking if "everything is okay?" On each admission, I would be discharged home after a couple of days. We all knew I'd be back again within a month or two.


Assuntos
Cetoacidose Diabética/diagnóstico , Cetoacidose Diabética/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Narração , Avaliação das Necessidades , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Recidiva , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...