Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 172(5): 1411-4, 1995 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7594691

RESUMO

Ligase chain reaction (LCR) to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection was evaluated using first-catch urine (FCU) specimens from 4053 women. Results were compared with those of cell culture (TC) isolation from cervix (all) and urethra (2812 women). The reference standard was TC positivity or positive LCR for chlamydial plasmid DNA confirmed by direct fluorescent antibody test or LCR for another chlamydial gene. Compared with cervical culture, LCR was 88.2% sensitive and 100% specific. Adding urethral culture increased TC sensitivity from 67.1% to 74% and reduced LCR sensitivity to 85.9%. The prevalence of chlamydial infection was 5% (142/2812) by the dual culture system and 5.9% (165/2812) by LCR on FCU specimens. LCR on FCU specimens is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing chlamydial infection. It is more sensitive than TC and may well present public health authorities with a useful noninvasive screening test for chlamydial infection in asymptomatic women.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/microbiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Uretra/microbiologia , Células Cultivadas , Colo do Útero/patologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/urina , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Cultura/métodos , Feminino , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Plasmídeos/análise , Prevalência , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Uretra/patologia
2.
Am J Med ; 87(5A): 142S-147S, 1989 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2589358

RESUMO

A prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of monotherapy with ciprofloxacin with that of a combination of clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of patients with acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Pretreatment and post-treatment cervical culture specimens were obtained for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Pretreatment and post-treatment endometrial culture specimens were obtained for those organisms plus facultative and anaerobic bacteria. Minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined on all isolates by agar dilution. Clinical resolution of infection was seen in 31 of 33 (94 percent) ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 34 of 35 (97 percent) clindamycin/gentamicin-treated patients. N. gonorrhoeae was eradicated in all cases and C. trachomatis in 12 of 13 cases (92 percent). Ciprofloxacin appeared less effective than clindamycin/gentamicin in eradicating bacterial-vaginosis-associated organisms from post-treatment culture specimens obtained from the endometrium. Comparable clinical response was seen with both regimens. The significance of persistent bacterial-vaginosis-associated organisms following ciprofloxacin therapy is unclear. However, since one goal of treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease should be to eliminate organisms from the upper genital tract, ciprofloxacin may not provide optimal single-agent therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.


Assuntos
Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...