Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Hand (N Y) ; 10(1): 80-4, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25767424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to compare the outcomes of patients with severe basilar thumb osteoarthritis treated with trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon versus a suture button device. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for patients undergoing trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty with APL tendon or suture button fixation. Outcome measures included disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH); visual analog score (VAS); grip strength; key pinch; tip pinch; and thumb opposition. Radiographic measurements, surgical times, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients in the APL tendon group and 27 patients in the suture button group had a minimum 6-month follow-up. VAS, DASH, and functional measurements improved after surgery for both groups. Mean operative time was 68 min for the APL tendon group and 48 min for the suture button group. Complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of suture button fixation when compared to APL tendon suspensionplasty offers similar clinical outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

3.
J Hand Surg Am ; 37(10): 2035-40, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943839

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of tendon rupture after nonoperative and operative management of distal radius fractures, report clinical outcomes after tendon repair or transfer, and examine volar plate and dorsal screw prominence as a predictor of tendon rupture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review on patients treated for tendon rupture after distal radius fracture. We evaluated active range of motion, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, grip strength, and pain score, and performed radiographic evaluation of volar plate and dorsal screw prominence in both the study group and a matched control group. RESULTS: There were 6 tendon ruptures in 1,359 patients (0.4%) treated nonoperatively and 8 tendon ruptures in 999 patients (0.8%) treated with volar plate fixation. At the time of final follow-up, regardless of treatment, we noted that patients had minimal pain and excellent motion and grip strength. Mean Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand scores were 6 for patients treated nonoperatively and 4 for those treated with volar plating. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to verify volar plate or dorsal screw prominence as independent risk factors for tendon rupture after distal radius fractures. However, we recommend continued follow-up and plate removal for symptomatic patients who have volar plate prominence or dorsal screw prominence. In the event of tendon rupture, we report excellent clinical outcomes after tendon repair or tendon transfer. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Rádio/complicações , Traumatismos dos Tendões/etiologia , Idoso , Placas Ósseas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Força da Mão , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Fraturas do Rádio/terapia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ruptura , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Transferência Tendinosa , Tendões/transplante
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...