The Effect of Two Attending Surgeons on Patients With Large-Curve Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, chart review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of using two surgeons for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with AIS with large-magnitude curves (greater than 70°). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have shown that intraoperative risk factors can be reduced by having two surgeons operate simultaneously. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 47 patients between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with AIS with large-magnitude curves (greater than 70°). Patients with large-magnitude curves due to neuromuscular diseases or any defined pathology other than idiopathic scoliosis were excluded, as well as patients with kyphotic or kyphoscoliotic curves. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the total operative time, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), %EBL, and blood transfusion units. Total operative time for the two-surgeon group and single-surgeon group was 212.11 and 238.07 minutes, respectively (p = .078). The two-surgeon group averaged 0.26 blood transfusion units versus 0.39 units for the single-surgeon group (p = .50). Average hospital length of stay was decreased in the two-surgeon group (5.16 vs. 6.82 days, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of two surgeons for PSF for AIS has previously been shown to decrease operative time and blood loss, factors that are correlated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of both neurologic and nonneurologic complications. However, in this study, the technique of having two experienced orthopedic spine surgeons work simultaneously to perform pedicle screw-only posterior spinal fusion on large-magnitude AIS curves greater than 70° did not improve blood loss or operative time. Further study needs to continue to identify ways to minimize complications for patients who undergo spinal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative study.

Hip reconstruction is more painful than spine fusion in children with cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: Concerns about pain control in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) are especially anxiety provoking for parents, given the fact that spasticity, communication issues, and postoperative muscle spasms are significant problems that make pain control difficult in these patients. A better understanding of the magnitude and quality of the pain these patients experience after our surgical procedures would better prepare the patients and their families. The purpose of this study is to quantify the amount of postoperative pain in children with CP undergoing hip reconstruction and spinal fusion. Specifically, the study will compare pain scores and the amount of narcotics used between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of children with CP (GMFCS levels IV and V) over a 5-year period undergoing hip reconstruction (femoral osteotomy, pelvic osteotomy, or both) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. The primary end point was the total opioid used by the patient during the hospitalization, by converting all forms of narcotics to morphine equivalents. The secondary end point was the documentation of pain with standard pain scores at standard time points postoperatively. Adverse effects related to pain management were documented for both groups. Student's t-tests were utilized to statistically compare differences between the groups, with significance determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with CP who underwent hip reconstruction (mean age 8.8 years) were compared to 26 patients who underwent PSF (mean age 15.4 years). The total opioid used, normalized by body weight and by days length of stay (DLOS), in the hip group was 0.49 mg morphine/kg/DLOS, compared to 0.24 for the spine group (p = 0.014). The mean pain score for the hip group was 1.52, compared to 0.72 for the spine group (p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse effects related to pain management between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with CP undergoing hip reconstruction surgery had significantly more pain, as exhibited by requiring more narcotics and having higher pain scores, than those patients undergoing PSF. The knowledge that hip reconstruction is more painful than PSF for patients with CP will better prepare families about what to expect in the postoperative period and will alert providers to supply better postoperative pain control in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (case control series).

Adjunctive Pain Control Methods Lower Narcotic Use and Pain Scores for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of adjunctive pain medications (bupivacaine pump, dexmedetomidine, and ketorolac) will reduce the need for opioids, reduce postoperative pain, and shorten length of hospital stay in patients with AIS undergoing PSF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for AIS can cause significant postoperative pain. Adjunctive pain control modalities, including the use of ketorolac, dexmedetomidine, and subcutaneous bupivacaine pumps, all can lessen the effects of postoperative pain. METHODS: Retrospective review of adolescents aged 10-18 years with AIS receiving PSF surgery over the past 10 years at a tertiary care children's hospital. All patients with AIS undergoing PSF were included in the study. Patients older than 18 or younger than 10 years and those undergoing PSF for other diagnoses, including neuromuscular scoliosis, congenital scoliosis, and kyphosis, were excluded from the study. Patients' pain was managed postoperatively with adjunctive medications in addition to intravenous and oral opioids. Variables of interest were local anesthetic bupivacaine delivered through a subcutaneous pump, sedative/analgesic dexmedetomidine, and ketorolac. Primary outcomes analyzed were normalized opioid requirement after surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and length of stay in the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 196 children were analyzed with no significant differences in demographics. Univariate analysis showed that all 3 adjunct medications improved outcomes. A multivariate regression model of the outcomes with respect to the 3 medication variables of interest was built, showing that the bupivacaine pump significantly reduced normalized opioid requirement by 0.98 mg/kg (p = .001) and reduced VAS pain scores by 0.67 points (p = .004). Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the average VAS pain scores in the first 24 hours by 0.62 points (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the bupivacaine pump provided improved analgesia with lower pain scores, lower opioid requirements, and a lower length of stay.

Are We Undermedicating Patients With Neuromuscular Scoliosis After Posterior Spinal Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, matched study of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and patients with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing (PSF). OBJECTIVES: To compare pain management, through measurement of the amount of narcotic used and pain scores, for patients with neuromuscular (NM) scoliosis undergoing PSF to a cohort of patients with AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior spinal fusion for children with severe NM scoliosis carries a high risk of complications. Appropriate assessment of pain is crucial; undertreatment of pain leads to anxiety whereas overtreatment can lead to respiratory depression and additional complications. METHODS: A series of patients with NM scoliosis was matched for age, gender, and weight with a group of patients with AIS. Data collection included age, curve type and magnitude, and instrumentation type and levels fused. The total opioid used (TOU) was determined by summing all narcotics given during the hospital stay and converting them to morphine equivalent units. The data were then analyzed to determine differences in TOU. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients with NM scoliosis were included in the study. This group was matched with 25 patients with AIS scoliosis. The TOU for the NM group was 1.2 mg morphine/kg (range, 0.28-4.21 mg morphine/kg) whereas the TOU for the AIS group was 3.52 mg morphine/kg (range, 0.71-15.51 mg morphine/kg) (p < .0000001). CONCLUSIONS: In this case-control analysis, patients with AIS undergoing PSF received more than twice the amount of narcotic compared with a matched group of patients with NM scoliosis. These data suggest that NM patients' pain may be undertreated compared with AIS patients. More study is indicated to investigate pain assessment and pain control in this vulnerable patient population to improve care.