New insights on rural doctors' clinical courage in the context of the unfolding COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Rural doctors typically work in low-resource settings and with limited professional support. They are sometimes pushed to the limits of their usual scope of practice to provide the medical care needed by their community. In a previous phenomenological study, we described the concept of clinical courage as underpinning rural doctors' work in this context. In this paper, we draw on rural doctors' experiences during the unfolding COVID pandemic to re-examine our understanding of the attributes of clinical courage. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural doctors from 11 countries who had experience preparing for or managing patients with COVID-19. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. A deductive thematic analysis was undertaken to identify common ideas and responses related to the features of clinical courage. Results: Thirteen interviews from rural doctors during the unfolding COVID-19 pandemic affirmed and enriched our understanding of the attributes of clinical courage, particularly the leadership role rural doctors can have within their communities. Conclusion: This study extended our understanding that rural doctors' experience of clinical courage is consistent amongst participants in many parts of the world, including developing countries.

Résumé Introduction: Les médecins ruraux travaillent généralement dans des environnements à faibles ressources et avec un soutien professionnel limité. Ils sont parfois poussés aux limites de leur champ d'action habituel pour fournir les soins médicaux dont leur communauté a besoin. Dans une étude phénoménologique précédente, et dans ce contexte, nous avons décrit le concept de courage clinique comme étant à la base du travail des médecins ruraux. Dans cet article, nous nous appuyons sur les expériences des médecins ruraux au cours de la pandémie de COVID pour réexaminer notre compréhension des attributs du courage clinique. Méthodes: Des entretiens semi-structurés ont été menés avec des médecins ruraux de 11 pays ayant une expérience de la préparation ou de la prise en charge de patients atteints de COVID-19. Les entretiens ont été transcrits mot à mot et codés à l'aide de NVivo. Une analyse thématique déductive a été entreprise pour identifier les idées et les réponses communes liées aux caractéristiques du courage clinique. Résultats: Treize entretiens avec des médecins ruraux, durant la pandémie de COVID-19, ont confirmé et enrichi notre compréhension des attributs du courage clinique, en particulier le rôle de leadership que les médecins ruraux peuvent jouer au sein de leurs communautés. Conclusion: Cette étude nous a permis de mieux comprendre que l'expérience des médecins ruraux en matière de courage clinique est la même pour tous les participants dans de nombreuses régions du monde, y compris dans les pays en développement. Mots-clés: Courage clinique, médecins ruraux, pandémie de COVID-19.

Developing conceptually sound items for a clinical courage questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical courage can be described as a rural doctor's adaptability and willingness to undertake clinical work at the limits of their training and experience to meet the needs of their patients. This article describes the in-house development of survey items to include in a quantitative measure of clinical courage. METHODS: The questionnaire development involved two key concepts: a second-order latent factor model structure and a nominal group technique, used to develop consensus among the research team members. RESULTS: The steps taken to develop a sound clinical courage questionnaire are described in detail. The resulting initial questionnaire is presented, ready for testing with rural clinicians and refinement. CONCLUSION: This article outlines the psychometric process of questionnaire design and presents the resultant clinical courage questionnaire.

Australian general practice registrars' experiences of training, well-being and support during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Providing well-supported general practice (GP) training is fundamental to strengthen the primary health workforce. Research into the unique needs of GP registrars during disasters is limited. Registrar burnout and insufficient support have been associated with personal and professional detrimental effects. This study aims to explore the experiences of Australian GP registrars with learning, well-being and support from their training organisation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to guide training organisation efforts to support registrars through future disasters. SETTING: Interviews were conducted via Zoom. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen GP registrars from South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales who had experienced community-based GP training in both 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (early pandemic). OUTCOME MEASURES: Training, well-being and support experiences were explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and themes analysed. RESULTS: Diverse experiences were reported: changes included telehealth, online tutorials, delayed examinations and social restrictions. Social and professional connections strongly influenced experiences. Personal and training factors were also important. Additional GP training organisation support was minimally needed when strong connections were in place. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies aspects of support which shaped registrars' diverse experiences of COVID-19, particularly regarding professional and social connections. Findings illustrate the importance of broad principles around supporting registrar well-being. Particularly significant aspects of support include connection to educational mentors such as supervisors and medical educators; connection and culture within practices; opportunities to share clinical experiences; and connection to personal social supports. Participation in this global disaster contributed to registrars' developing professionalism. GP training organisations are positioned to implement monitoring and supports for registrars through disasters. Although registrars may not require significant GP training organisation intervention where powerful professional and personal connections exist, strong foundational GP training organisation supports can be established and augmented to support registrars in need before and during future disasters. These findings contribute to the global developing field of knowledge of registrar training and well-being needs during crises.

Exploring rural doctors' early experiences of coping with the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To understand how rural doctors (physicians) responded to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic and their strategies for coping. METHODS: Early in the pandemic doctors (physicians) who practise rural and remote medicine were invited to participate through existing rural doctors' networks. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural doctors from 11 countries. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. A thematic analysis was used to identify common ideas and narratives. FINDINGS: Participants' accounts described highly adaptable and resourceful responses to address the crisis. Rapid changes to organizational and clinical practices were implemented, at a time of uncertainty, anxiety, and fear, and with limited information and resources. Strong relationships and commitment to their colleagues and communities were integral to shaping and sustaining these doctors' responses. We identified five common themes underpinning rural doctors' shared experiences: (1) caring for patients in a context of uncertainty, fear, and anxiety; (2) practical solutions through improvising and being resourceful; (3) gaining community trust and cooperation; (4) adapting to unrelenting pressures; and (5) reaffirming commitments. These themes are discussed in relation to the Lazarus and Folkman stress and coping model. CONCLUSIONS: With limited resources and support, these rural doctors' practical responses to the COVID-19 crisis underscore strong problem-focused coping strategies and shared commitments to their communities, patients, and colleagues. They drew support from sharing experiences with peers (emotion-focused coping) and finding positive meanings in their experiences (meaning-based coping). The psychosocial impact on rural doctors working at the limits of their adaptive resources is an ongoing concern.

Assessment of sexual difficulties associated with multi-modal treatment for cervical or endometrial cancer: A systematic review of measurement instruments.

BACKGROUND: Practitioners and researchers require an outcome measure that accurately identifies the range of common treatment-induced changes in sexual function and well-being experienced by women after cervical or endometrial cancer. This systematic review critically appraised the measurement properties and clinical utility of instruments validated for the measurement of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in this clinical population. METHODS: A bibliographic database search for questionnaire development or validation papers was completed and methodological quality and measurement properties of selected studies rated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) checklist. RESULTS: 738 articles were screened, 13 articles retrieved for full text assessment and 7 studies excluded, resulting in evaluation of 6 papers; 2 QoL and 4 female sexual morbidity measures. Five of the six instruments omitted one or more dimension of female sexual function and only one instrument explicitly measured distress associated with sexual changes as per DSM V (APA 2013) diagnostic criteria. None of the papers reported measurement error, responsiveness data was available for only two instruments, three papers failed to report on criterion validity, and test-retest reliability reporting was inconsistent. Heterosexual penile-vaginal intercourse remains the dominant sexual activity focus for sexual morbidity PROMS terminology and instruments lack explicit reference to solo or non-coital sexual expression or validation in a non-heterosexual sample. Four out of six instruments included mediating treatment or illness items such as vaginal changes, menopause or altered body image. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) remains the most robust sexual morbidity outcome measure, for research or clinical use, in sexually active women treated for cervical or endometrial cancer. Development of an instrument that measures sexual dysfunction in women who are infrequently/not sexually active due to treatment consequences is still required to identify women in need of sexual rehabilitation.

Discussing the sexual consequences of treatment in radiotherapy and urology consultations with couples affected by prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the ways in which prostate cancer treatment-induced sexual changes are presented as viable topics for discussion in urology and radiotherapy clinics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ethnographic observations were made of 60 consultations between clinicians, patients and partners in clinical oncology and prostate cancer urology clinics. RESULTS: Sexual functioning was discussed infrequently in both clinic settings. Despite the presence of partners in nearly half of consultations, involvement of the partner tended to be minimal. Overall, discussions of wider psychosexual concerns were marginalised in consultations, and there were limited opportunities for couples to discuss the specific impact of prostate cancer and its treatments on sexual functioning. CONCLUSION: Given the potential burden of symptoms and side-effects, there is a need to include discussions of sexual recovery and rehabilitation in consultations, and to provide opportunities to discuss the sexual consequences of treatment with men and their partners.