The Critical Care Communication project: improving fellows' communication skills.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based communication skills training workshop to improve the communication skills of critical care fellows. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary and critical care fellows (N = 38) participated in a 3-day communication skills workshop between 2008 and 2010 involving brief didactic talks, faculty demonstration of skills, and faculty-supervised small group skills practice sessions with simulated families. Skills included the following: giving bad news, achieving consensus on goals of therapy, and discussing the limitations of life-sustaining treatment. Participants rated their skill levels in a pre-post survey in 11 core communication tasks using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 38 fellows, 36 (95%) completed all 3 days of the workshop. We compared pre and post scores using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Overall, self-rated skills increased for all 11 tasks. In analyses by participant, 95% reported improvement in at least 1 skill; with improvement in a median of 10 of 11 skills. Ninety-two percent rated the course as either very good/excellent, and 80% recommended that it be mandatory for future fellows. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-day communication skills training program increased critical care fellows' self-reported family meeting communication skills.

CD4+ lymphocyte adenosine triphosphate determination in sepsis: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering from sepsis are currently classified on a clinical basis (i.e., sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock); however, this clinical classification may not accurately reflect the overall immune status of an individual patient. Our objective was to describe a cohort of patients with sepsis in terms of their measured immune status. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with sepsis (n = 13), severe sepsis (n = 21), or septic shock (n = 18) were studied. The immune status was determined by measuring the CD4+ lymphocyte adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content after mitogen stimulation in whole blood. RESULTS: The measured CD4+ lymphocyte ATP content at the time of ICU admission did not differ among the various groups defined by the sepsis classification system (sepsis = 454 +/- 79 ng/ml; severe sepsis = 359 +/- 54 ng/ml; septic shock = 371 +/- 53 ng/ml; P = 0.44). Furthermore, survivors of sepsis had a significantly higher CD4+ lymphocyte ATP content at the time of ICU admission than did nonsurvivors of sepsis (431 +/- 41 ng/mL vs. 266 +/- 53 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The sepsis classification system that is currently used is not representative of the individual immune status as determined by measuring the CD4+ lymphocyte ATP content. Moreover, a lower CD4+ ATP content at the time of ICU admission is associated with a worse clinical outcome in those suffering from sepsis.

Symptomatic treatment of infections in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care.

Symptom control is one of the primary goals of hospice care. We prospectively followed patients with advanced cancer receiving outpatient hospice care to determine if the use of antimicrobials for a clinically suspected infection improved infection-related symptoms. During a 24-month period, 1,731 patients with a cancer diagnosis were admitted to a community-based outpatient hospice program. Over 89% of the patients had a Karnofsky performance of < or =60%. Six hundred twenty-three of 1,598 study patients were diagnosed with a total of 685 infections. Six hundred thirty-three of the infections were treated with antimicrobials for a clinically suspected infection. Symptoms were recorded, clinically indicated cultures were obtained, and antimicrobials were instituted at the discretion of the attending physician. Patients were subsequently monitored to determine the effects of antimicrobials on infection-related symptoms. A complete or a partial response of infection-related symptoms was observed in 79% of 265 patients with urinary tract infections, 43% of 221 patients with respiratory tract infections, 46% of 63 patients with oral cavity infections, 41% of 59 patients with skin or subcutaneous infections, and none of 25 patients with bacteremia. Fifty-two of the infections were not evaluable due to refusal of antimicrobials or receipt of less than 72 hours of antimicrobials. Patient survival in this study was not affected by the presence of infection or the use of antimicrobials. Although the use of antimicrobials improved symptoms in the majority of patients with urinary tract infections, symptom control was less successful in infections of the respiratory tract, mouth/pharynx, skin/subcutaneous tissue, or blood. Physicians should be aware of the limitations of the use of antimicrobials in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care. Treatment guidelines are proposed emphasizing the importance of patient preferences and the use of symptom control as the major indication for the use of antimicrobials in this patient population.

Antimicrobial use in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care.

Patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice and palliative care are highly susceptible to infections. The decision whether to treat an active or suspected infection in end-of-life care may be difficult. In order to develop guidelines for the use of antimicrobials (antibiotics and antifungals) in palliative care, we discussed antimicrobial options with 255 patients with advanced cancer at the time they entered a community-based hospice and palliative care program. We subsequently documented the use and effectiveness of the antimicrobials employed during the palliative care period. Most patients (79.2%) chose either no antimicrobials or symptomatic use only. Choices were influenced by age, the desire for symptom control, life-prolongation issues, and the condition of the patient. After admission, 117 patients had a total of 129 infections, with the most common sites being urinary tract, respiratory tract, mouth/pharynx, and skin/subcutaneous tissues. The use of antimicrobials controlled symptoms in the majority of the urinary tract infections, but were less effective in controlling symptoms in the other sites of infection. Survival was not affected by the patients' choice of whether to use antimicrobials, the prevalence of infections, or the actual use of antimicrobials. Symptom control may be the major indication for antimicrobial use for patients receiving hospice and palliative care.