Understanding successful and unsuccessful landings of aerial maneuver variations in professional surfing.

Although performing aerial maneuvers can increase wave score and winning potential in competitive surfing, the critical features underlying successful aerial performance have not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to analyze highly skilled aerial maneuver performance and to identify the critical features associated with successful or unsuccessful landing. Using video recordings of the World Surf League's Championship Tour, every aerial performed during the quarterfinal, semifinal, and final heats from the 11 events in the 2015 season was viewed. From this, 121 aerials were identified with the Frontside Air (n = 15) and Frontside Air Reverse (n = 67) being selected to be qualitatively assessed. Using chi-squared analyses, a series of key critical features, including landing over the center of the surfboard (FS Air χ2  = 14.00, FS Air Reverse χ2  = 26.61; P < .001) and landing with the lead ankle in dorsiflexion (FS Air χ2  = 3.90, FS Air Reverse χ2  = 13.64; P < .05), were found to be associated with successful landings. These critical features help surfers land in a stable position, while maintaining contact with the surfboard. The results of this study provide coaches with evidence to adjust the technique of their athletes to improve their winning potential.

Passive dorsiflexion stiffness is poorly correlated with passive dorsiflexion range of motion.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships among passive measures of weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion, non-weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion and dorsiflexion stiffness, thereby establishing whether they assess similar mechanical characteristics, as each measure has been implicated in injury risk during landings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Passive weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion, non-weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion and dorsiflexion stiffness were quantified for 42 males (22.8±5.0 years). The relationship between each data set was calculated using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Although weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion and non-weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion were significantly correlated, the strength of the relationship was poor (r(2)=0.18; p=0.004). Weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion (mean=43.0±5.0°) was significantly greater than non-weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion (29.8±5.9°; p<0.001) and weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion and non-weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion were also poorly correlated with passive dorsiflexion stiffness (1.48±0.55Nm°(-1); r(2)=0.04 and r(2)=0.14, respectively), despite the latter relationship being significant (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Passive dorsiflexion stiffness was not strongly associated with dorsiflexion range of motion, despite the significant correlation in the non-weight-bearing condition. It must be acknowledged that passive dorsiflexion stiffness was weakly associated with dorsiflexion range of motion, although the strength of the association suggests that it may not necessarily determine dorsiflexion range of motion. Furthermore, the functional dorsiflexion limits of the ankle during weight-bearing tasks may be underestimated or misrepresented by non-weight-bearing measures of dorsiflexion range of motion. Therefore, although ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and dorsiflexion stiffness have been implicated in injury risk during weight-bearing tasks such as landings, it may be due to different mechanisms.

Effects of passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness on ankle mechanics during drop landings.

OBJECTIVES: Vertical landing tasks strain the Achilles tendon and plantar-flexors, increasing acute and overuse strain injury risk. This study aimed to determine how passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness affected ankle mechanics during single limb drop landings at different vertical descent velocities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness and passive weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion (DROM) were quantified for 42 men. Participants were then grouped as having low (LPS: 0.94±0.15 Nm°â»¹; n=16) or high (HPS: 2.05±0.36 Nm°â»¹; n=16; p<0.001) passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness. Three-dimensional ankle joint kinematics was quantified while participants performed drop landings onto a force platform at two vertical descent velocities (slow: 2.25±0.16 ms⁻¹; fast: 3.21±0.17 ms⁻¹). RESULTS: Although affected by landing velocity, there were no significant effects of passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness, nor any significant ankle dorsiflexion stiffness×vertical descent velocity interactions on any outcome variables characterising ankle mechanics during drop landings. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups for passive weight-bearing DROM (LPS: 43.9±4.1°; HPS: 42.5±5.7°), indicating that the results were not confounded by between-group differences in ankle range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: Neither high nor low passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness was found to influence ankle biomechanics during drop landings at different descent velocities. Landing strategies were moderated more by the demands of the task than by passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness, indicating that passive ankle dorsiflexion stiffness may not affect plantar-flexor strain during a drop landing.