Cadaveric Study of Colon Lengthening Maneuvers Following Sigmoidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Creation of a tension free colorectal anastomosis after left colon resection or low anterior resection is a key requirement for technical success. The relative contribution of each of a series of known lengthening maneuvers remains incompletely characterized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare technical procedures for lengthening of the left colon prior to rectal anastomosis. DESIGN: A series of lengthening maneuvers was performed on 15 fresh cadavers. Average distance gained was measured for each successive maneuver, including (1) high inferior mesenteric artery ligation, (2) splenic flexure takedown, and (3) high inferior mesenteric vein ligation by the ligament of Treitz. SETTING: Cadaveric study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The pre-mobilization and post-mobilization position of the proximal colonic end was measured relative to the inferior edge of the sacral promontory. Measurements of the colonic length relative to the sacral promontory were taken following each mobilization maneuver. The inferior mesenteric artery, sigmoid colon and rectum specimen lengths were measured. The distance from the inferior border of the sacral promontory to the pelvic floor was measured along the sacral curvature. RESULTS: Average sigmoid colon resection length was 34.7 ± 11.1 cm. Prior to any lengthening, baseline reach was -1.3 ± 4.2 cm from the sacral promontory. Inferior mesenteric artery ligation yielded an additional 11.5 ± 4.7 cm. Subsequent splenic flexure takedown added an additional 12.8 ± 9.6 cm. Finally, inferior mesenteric vein ligation added an additional 11.33 ± 6.9 cm, bringing the total colonic length to 35.7 ± 14.7 cm. BMI and weight negatively correlated with length gained. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by nature of being a cadaver study. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise lengthening maneuvers allow significant additional reach to allow a tension free left colon to rectal anastomosis. See Video Abstract.

Optimizing Appropriate Disposal of Unused Postoperative Opioid: What Happens to Unused Medication?

BACKGROUND: Increase in opioid prescribing practices has occurred with concurrent increases in the levels of abuse, addiction, and diversion of opioid pain medication. With 82.5 opioid prescriptions prescribed for every 100 U.S. citizens, the need for more effective strategies aimed at improving opioid disposal exist. Our study sought to examine the planned rates of appropriate opioid disposal after introduction of an activated charcoal home drug disposal system (Deterra®) in combination with formalized opioid disposal education. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an academic, public safety-net hospital and grouped into 3 cohorts, no formalized opioid disposal education (No Education), written and verbal patient education on appropriate opioid disposal (Education), and Deterra® in addition to formalized opioid disposal education (Deterra). Outcomes included patients reporting unacceptable methods of opioid disposal, storage of unused opiates, and patient satisfaction with disposal instructions. RESULTS: Reported unacceptable opioid disposal decreased from 80.6% (n = 87) in the no education group to 20% (n = 10) in the education group to 6% (n = 3) in the Deterra group (P < .001). Education decreased long-term storage of opioid medication after completion of usage from 42% (n = 36) to 2% (n = 1), P < .001. Between the education and Deterra groups, more patients felt that the disposal instructions were clear (94% (n = 47) vs 73% (n = 36), P = .006) and more followed acceptable disposal instructions (80% (n = 39) vs 94% (n = 47) P < .001). CONCLUSION: Deterra® along with formal opioid disposal education increases patients reporting plans for compliance with appropriate opioid disposal.

Minimally invasive management of an ascending colonic perforation secondary to distal biliary stent migration: a multidisciplinary, novel laparoendoscopic approach.

Endobiliary stents placed for benign and malignant indications can spontaneously dislocate from the biliary system and migrate to the distal gastrointestinal tract. Stent migration can result in gastrointestinal perforation, with the most common locations in the sigmoid and distal colon, and may require surgical intervention. We describe the case of a 60-year-old female presenting with an ascending colonic perforation secondary to a dislodged plastic biliary stent placed for palliation of her gallbladder carcinoma. The patient was managed with a combined laparoendoscopic approach by a multidisciplinary team-gastroenterology performed an endoscopic stent retrieval and colorectal surgery identified the location of the perforation laparoscopically and performed colonic serosal repairs. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 4. This case demonstrates a novel minimally invasive laparoendoscopic approach at a high-volume academic center for the treatment of ascending colonic perforation secondary to biliary stent migration.

"Unresectable" polyp management utilizing advanced endoscopic techniques results in high rate of colon preservation.

PURPOSE: "Endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps identified during screening colonoscopy are often referred for segmental colectomy. Application of advanced endoscopic techniques can increase endoscopic polyp resection, sparing patients the morbidity of colectomy. This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the success of colon preserving resection of "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps using advanced endoscopic techniques including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoluminal surgical intervention, full-thickness laparo-endoscopic excision, and combined endo-laparoscopic resection. METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional database identified 95 patients referred for "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps from 2015 to 2018. Cases were compared to 190 propensity score matched controls from the same database undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy for other reasons. Primary outcome was rate of complete endoscopic polyp removal. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, unplanned 30-day readmission and reoperation, 30-day mortality, and post-procedural complications. RESULTS: Advanced endoscopic techniques achieved complete polyp removal without colectomy in 66 patients (70%). Failure was most commonly associated with previously attempted endoscopic resection and occult malignancy. Compared with matched colectomy controls, endoscopic polyp resection resulted in significantly shorter hospital length of stay (1.13 ± 2.41 vs 3.89 ± 4.57 days; p < 0.001), lower unplanned 30-day readmission (1.1% vs 7.7%; p < 0.05), and fewer postoperative complications (4.2% vs 33.9%; p < 0.001). Unplanned 30-day reoperation (2.1% vs 4.4%; p = 0.34) and 30-day mortality (0% vs 0.6%; p = 0.75) trended lower. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection of complex polyps can be highly successful, and it is associated with favorable outcomes and decreased morbidity when compared with segmental colon resection. Attempting colon preservation using these techniques is warranted.

Do or doughnut: A systematic review and pooled analysis on the utility of pathological evaluation of the anastomotic doughnut in oncological colorectal operations.

AIM: End-to-end anastomosis staplers are frequently used in colorectal surgery, generating two anastomotic doughnuts. Whether pathological evaluation of the doughnut changes clinical practice remains unclear. We aim to identify any effects of pathological evaluation of anastomotic doughnuts after oncological colorectal surgery. METHOD: We performed a systematic literature search utilizing PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases and selected studies on evaluation of the anastomotic doughnut after oncological colorectal surgery with stapled end-to-end anastomosis. Outcome measures included: involved distal margin on the oncological sample, histological involvement of the doughnut, clinical change in management from a positive doughnut and study recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 5761 studies identified, eight studies encompassing 1754 patients were evaluated. Most operations were for primary colon (37.5%) or rectal adenocarcinoma (37.5%). Incidence of distal margin involvement of the oncological sample was reported in three papers, with six positive cases (1.1%). Of the 1754 doughnut pairs evaluated, five were positive for neoplasia (0.29%), three for adenomas (0.18%) and one for metaplastic polyp (0.06%), none of which changed postoperative treatment. Four studies recommended abandoning routine histopathological evaluation of anastomotic doughnuts, while the remaining four recommended evaluation only under certain criteria, including gross distal margin <2 cm (one study), gross distal margin <3 cm (one study), tumours undetected on gross examination (one study), 'histologically aggressive cancers' or grossly involved distal margin (one study). CONCLUSION: Routine evaluation of anastomotic doughnuts should be reconsidered, as <1% are positive for neoplasia. Exceptions may include specific scenarios where histopathology is likely to be clinically useful.

Full-Thickness Laparoendoscopic Excision for Management of Complex Colon Polyps.

BACKGROUND: Benign colon polyps are increasingly being detected because of improved colonoscopic screening and early detection of masses on the adenoma-to-carcinoma pathway. Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision is a colon-preserving technique for endoscopically unresectable polyps consisting of endoscopically guided nonanatomic wedge colectomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and success of full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision compared to segmental colectomy for complex polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: A prospectively maintained institutional database identified 22 patients with benign complex polyps managed with full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision from 2015 to 2020. These patients were compared with 22 propensity score-matched controls from the same database that underwent laparoscopic segmental colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was inpatient length of stay. Secondary outcomes included operative details and postoperative morbidities. RESULTS: Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision was successful in all patients. Patients had a median age of 64 years (41-85), and 82% were men. Final pathology revealed complete excision of benign lesions in 20 of 22 patients and adenocarcinoma in 2 of 22. For the adenocarcinomas, 1 patient underwent subsequent elective colectomy without complications, and 1 patient declined surgery. Propensity score matching was successful for age, sex, BMI, ASA score, colon location, and prior abdominal surgery. Compared with controls, cases had significantly shorter operative time (89.5 minutes (46-290) vs 122 minutes (85-200), p = 0.009), length of stay (1 day (0-17) vs 3 days (1-8), p < 0.001), and reduced blood loss (5 mL (2-15) vs 25 mL (10-150), p < 0.001). Thirty-day morbidity (9.1% vs 27.3%, p = 0.240) was not significantly different. An unplanned 30-day reoperation was performed in 1 patient for suspected small-bowel obstruction. There was 1 mortality due to decompensated cirrhosis in the treatment group. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its single-institution retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision is safe and successful compared with corresponding segmental colectomy for complex polyps. Favorable postoperative outcomes, including decreased operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, make it a useful approach for managing complex polyps throughout the colon.

Reduction of Opioid Overprescribing and Use Following Standardized Educational Intervention: A Survey of Patient Experiences Following Anorectal Procedures.

BACKGROUND: A pilot study conducted at our institution showed that a significant amount of prescribed postoperative opioids is left unused with the potential for diversion and misuse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of provider- and patient-targeted educational interventions on postoperative opioid prescription and use following anorectal procedures. DESIGN: Patients were enrolled on July 2019 through March 2020 after implementing educational interventions (study) and were compared with the pilot study group (control) enrolled on August 2018 through May 2019. A telephone survey was conducted 1 week postoperatively. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a 600-bed, safety-net hospital in southern California. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing ambulatory anorectal procedures were included. Patients who had undergone an examination under anesthesia, had been incarcerated, and had used opioids preoperatively were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Educational interventions were developed based on the pilot study results. Providers received education on recommended opioid prescription quantities and a multimodal pain regimen. Standardized patient education infographics were distributed to patients pre- and postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were total opioid prescribed, total opioid consumed, pain control satisfaction levels, and the need for additional opioid prescription. RESULTS: A total of 104 of 122 (85%) patients enrolled responded to the survey and were compared with the 112 patients included in the control group. Despite similar demographics, the study cohort was prescribed fewer milligram morphine equivalents (78.8 ± 11.3 vs 294.0 ± 33.1, p < 0.001), consumed fewer milligram morphine equivalents (23.0 ± 28.0 vs 57.1 ± 45.8, p < 0.001), and had a higher rate of nonopioid medication use (72% vs 10%, p < 0.001). The 2 groups had similar pain control satisfaction levels (4.1 ± 1.3 vs 3.9 ± 1.1 out of 5, p = 0.12) and an additional opioid prescription requirement (5% vs 4%, p = 1.0). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its single-center experience with specific patient population characteristics. CONCLUSION: Educational interventions emphasizing evidence-based recommended opioid prescription quantities and regimented multimodal pain regimens are effective in decreasing excessive opioid prescribing and use without compromising satisfactory pain control in patients undergoing ambulatory anorectal procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B529. REDUCCIN DE LA SOBREPRESCRIPCIN Y EL USO DE OPIOIDES DESPUS DE UNA INTERVENCIN EDUCATIVA ESTANDARIZADA UNA ENCUESTA DE LAS EXPERIENCIAS EN PACIENTES POSTOPERADOS DE PROCEDIMIENTOS ANORRECTALES: ANTECEDENTES:Un estudio piloto realizado en nuestra institución mostró que una cantidad significativa de opioides posoperatorios recetados no se usa, con potencial de desvío y uso indebido.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el impacto de las intervenciones educativas dirigidas al paciente y al proveedor sobre la prescripción y el uso de opioides posoperatorios después de procedimientos anorrectales.DISEÑO:Los pacientes se incluyeron entre julio de 2019 y marzo de 2020 después de implementar intervenciones educativas (estudio) y se compararon con el grupo de estudio piloto (control) inscrito entre agosto de 2018 y mayo de 2019. Se realizó una encuesta telefónica una semana después de la cirugía.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Hospital de 600 camas en el sur de California.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos sometidos a procedimientos anorrectales ambulatorios. Los criterios de exclusión fueron pacientes que recibieron un examen bajo anestesia, pacientes encarcelados y uso preoperatorio de opioides.INTERVENCIONES:Se desarrollaron intervenciones educativas basadas en los resultados del estudio piloto. Los proveedores recibieron educación sobre las cantidades recomendadas de opioides recetados y un régimen multimodal para el dolor. Se distribuyeron infografías estandarizadas de educación para el paciente antes y después de la operación.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Opioide total prescrito, opioide total consumido, niveles de satisfacción del control del dolor y necesidad de prescripción adicional de opioides.RESULTADOS:Un total de 104 de 122 (85%) pacientes inscritos respondieron a la encuesta y se compararon con los 112 pacientes incluidos en el grupo de control. A pesar de una demografía similar, a la cohorte del estudio se le prescribió menos miligramos de equivalente de morfina (MME) (78,8 ± 11,3 frente a 294,0 ± 33,1, p <0,001), consumió menos MME (23,0 ± 28,0 frente a 57,1 ± 45,8, p <0,001) y presentaron una mayor tasa de uso de medicamentos no opioides (72% vs 10%, p <0,001). Los dos grupos tenían niveles similares de satisfacción del control del dolor (4,1 ± 1,3 frente a 3,9 ± 1,1 de 5, p = 0,12) y la necesidad de prescripción de opioides adicionales (5% frente a 4%, p = 1,0).LIMITACIONES:Experiencia en un solo centro con características específicas de la población de pacientes.CONCLUSIÓN:Las intervenciones educativas que enfatizan las cantidades recomendadas de prescripción de opioides basadas en la evidencia y los regímenes de dolor multimodales reglamentados son efectivas para disminuir la prescripción y el uso excesivos de opioides sin comprometer el control satisfactorio del dolor en pacientes sometidos a procedimientos anorrectales ambulatorios. Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B529.

Outcomes of colostomy takedown following Hartmann's procedure: successful restoration of continuity comes with a high risk of morbidity.

AIM: Restoration of bowel continuity following a Hartmann's procedure is a major surgical undertaking associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with Hartmann's reversal. METHOD: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients from institutional databases who were selected to undergo open or laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal at two tertiary academic referral centres and a public safety net hospital (2010-2019). The main outcome measure was the rate of successful stoma reversal. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative outcomes and procedural details. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients underwent attempted reversal during the study period, which was successful in all but three patients (98%). Patients were 59% Hispanic and 73% male, with a mean age of 48.7 ± 14.1 years, mean American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 2.2 ± 0.6 and mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 ± 5.3 kg/m2 , with 39% of patients having a BMI > 30 kg/m2 . The mean time interval between the index procedure and reversal was 14.4 months, 53% of the index cases were performed at outside institutions and the most common index diagnoses were diverticulitis (54%), abdominal trauma (16%) and colorectal malignancy (15%). In 22% of cases a laparoscopic approach was used, with 42% of these requiring conversion to open. Proximal diverting stomas were created in 32 patients (21%), of which 94% were reversed. The overall morbidity rate was 54%, comprising ileus (32%), wound infection (15%) and anastomotic leak (6%), with a major morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) of 23%. CONCLUSION: Hartmann's reversal remains a highly morbid procedure. Our results suggest that operative candidates can be successfully reversed, but there is significant morbidity associated with restoration of intestinal continuity, particularly in obese patients. A laparoscopic approach may decrease morbidity in selected patients but such cases have a high conversion rate.

KREX2 is not essential for either procyclic or bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei.

BACKGROUND: Most mitochondrial mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei require RNA editing for maturation and translation. The edited RNAs primarily encode proteins of the oxidative phosphorylation system. These parasites undergo extensive changes in energy metabolism between the insect and bloodstream stages which are mirrored by alterations in RNA editing. Two U-specific exonucleases, KREX1 and KREX2, are both present in protein complexes (editosomes) that catalyze RNA editing but the relative roles of each protein are not known. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The requirement for KREX2 for RNA editing in vivo was assessed in both procyclic (insect) and bloodstream form parasites by methods that use homologous recombination for gene elimination. These studies resulted in null mutant cells in which both alleles were eliminated. The viability of these cells demonstrates that KREX2 is not essential in either life cycle stage, despite certain defects in RNA editing in vivo. Furthermore, editosomes isolated from KREX2 null cells require KREX1 for in vitro U-specific exonuclease activity. CONCLUSIONS: KREX2 is a U-specific exonuclease that is dispensable for RNA editing in vivo in T. brucei BFs and PFs. This result suggests that the U deletion activity, which is required for RNA editing, is primarily mediated in vivo by KREX1 which is normally found associated with only one type of editosome. The retention of the KREX2 gene implies a non-essential role or a role that is essential in other life cycle stages or conditions.

Endonuclease associations with three distinct editosomes in Trypanosoma brucei.

Three distinct editosomes, typified by mutually exclusive KREN1, KREN2, or KREN3 endonucleases, are essential for mitochondrial RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei. The three editosomes differ in substrate endoribonucleolytic cleavage specificity, which may reflect the vast number of editing sites that need insertion or deletion of uridine nucleotides (Us). Each editosome requires the single RNase III domain in each endonuclease for catalysis. Studies reported here show that the editing endonucleases do not form homodimeric domains, and may therefore function as intermolecular heterodimers, perhaps with KREPB4 and/or KREPB5. Editosomes isolated via TAP tag fused to KREPB6, KREPB7, or KREPB8 have a common set of 12 proteins. In addition, KREN3 is only found in KREPB6 editosomes, KREN2 is only found in KREPB7 editosomes, and KREN1 is only found in KREPB8 editosomes. These are the same associations previously found in editosomes isolated via the TAP-tagged endonucleases KREN1, KREN2, or KREN3. Furthermore, TAP-tagged KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 complexes isolated from cells in which expression of their respective endonuclease were knocked down were disrupted and lacked the heterotrimeric insertion subcomplex (KRET2, KREPA1, and KREL2). These results and published data suggest that KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 associate with the deletion subcomplex, whereas the KREN1, KREN2, and KREN3 endonucleases associate with the insertion subcomplex.